| Message ID | 20240722202758.3889061-1-jolsa@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | selftests/bpf: Add more uprobe multi tests | expand |
Dear patch submitter, CI has tested the following submission: Status: SUCCESS Name: [PATCHv3,bpf-next,0/2] selftests/bpf: Add more uprobe multi tests Patchwork: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=873053&state=* Matrix: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/10048022329 No further action is necessary on your part. Please note: this email is coming from an unmonitored mailbox. If you have questions or feedback, please reach out to the Meta Kernel CI team at kernel-ci@meta.com.
Dear patch submitter, CI has tested the following submission: Status: FAILURE Name: [PATCHv3,bpf-next,0/2] selftests/bpf: Add more uprobe multi tests Patchwork: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=873053&state=* Matrix: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/10050702681 Failed jobs: test_progs_no_alu32-aarch64-gcc: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/10050702681/job/27779250571 test_progs_no_alu32-s390x-gcc: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/10050702681/job/27779381610 test_progs_no_alu32-x86_64-gcc: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/10050702681/job/27779406344 test_progs_no_alu32-x86_64-llvm-17: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/10050702681/job/27779390782 test_progs_no_alu32-x86_64-llvm-18: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/10050702681/job/27779387928 First test_progs failure (test_progs_no_alu32-aarch64-gcc): #134 libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts libbpf: prog 'check_access': BPF program load failed: Invalid argument libbpf: prog 'check_access': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG -- 0: R1=ctx() R10=fp0 ; int BPF_PROG(check_access, struct bpf_map *map, fmode_t fmode) @ test_libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts.c:27 0: (b7) r0 = 0 ; R0_w=0 1: (79) r2 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0) func 'bpf_lsm_bpf_map' arg0 has btf_id 2072 type STRUCT 'bpf_map' 2: R1=ctx() R2_w=trusted_ptr_bpf_map() ; if (map != (struct bpf_map *)&data_input) @ test_libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts.c:29 2: (18) r3 = 0xffff0000c341f800 ; R3_w=map_ptr(map=data_input,ks=4,vs=4) 4: (5d) if r2 != r3 goto pc+4 ; R2_w=trusted_ptr_bpf_map() R3_w=map_ptr(map=data_input,ks=4,vs=4) ; int BPF_PROG(check_access, struct bpf_map *map, fmode_t fmode) @ test_libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts.c:27 5: (79) r0 = *(u64 *)(r1 +8) ; R0_w=scalar() R1=ctx() ; if (fmode & FMODE_WRITE) @ test_libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts.c:32 6: (67) r0 <<= 62 ; R0_w=scalar(smax=0x4000000000000000,umax=0xc000000000000000,smin32=0,smax32=umax32=0,var_off=(0x0; 0xc000000000000000)) 7: (c7) r0 s>>= 63 ; R0_w=scalar(smin=smin32=-1,smax=smax32=0) ; @ test_libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts.c:0 8: (57) r0 &= -13 ; R0_w=scalar(smax=0x7ffffffffffffff3,umax=0xfffffffffffffff3,smax32=0x7ffffff3,umax32=0xfffffff3,var_off=(0x0; 0xfffffffffffffff3)) ; int BPF_PROG(check_access, struct bpf_map *map, fmode_t fmode) @ test_libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts.c:27 9: (95) exit At program exit the register R0 has smax=9223372036854775795 should have been in [-4095, 0] processed 9 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 0 peak_states 0 mark_read 0 -- END PROG LOAD LOG -- libbpf: prog 'check_access': failed to load: -22 libbpf: failed to load object 'test_libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts' libbpf: failed to load BPF skeleton 'test_libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts': -22 test_libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts:FAIL:test_libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts__open_and_load unexpected error: -22 Please note: this email is coming from an unmonitored mailbox. If you have questions or feedback, please reach out to the Meta Kernel CI team at kernel-ci@meta.com.
Dear patch submitter, CI has tested the following submission: Status: SUCCESS Name: [PATCHv3,bpf-next,0/2] selftests/bpf: Add more uprobe multi tests Patchwork: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=873053&state=* Matrix: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/10051533401 No further action is necessary on your part. Please note: this email is coming from an unmonitored mailbox. If you have questions or feedback, please reach out to the Meta Kernel CI team at kernel-ci@meta.com.
Hello: This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master) by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>: On Mon, 22 Jul 2024 22:27:56 +0200 you wrote: > hi, > adding more uprobe multi tests for failed attachments > inside the uprobe register code. > > v3 changes: > - renamed several variables/functions, null check [Andrii] > - fixed CI issue > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [PATCHv3,bpf-next,1/2] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe fail tests for uprobe multi https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/f5ee7d559a7c - [PATCHv3,bpf-next,2/2] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe multi consumers test https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/c5ec71c325e7 You are awesome, thank you!
hi, adding more uprobe multi tests for failed attachments inside the uprobe register code. v3 changes: - renamed several variables/functions, null check [Andrii] - fixed CI issue thanks, jirka --- Jiri Olsa (2): selftests/bpf: Add uprobe fail tests for uprobe multi selftests/bpf: Add uprobe multi consumers test tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c | 331 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_consumers.c | 39 +++++++++++ 2 files changed, 370 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_consumers.c