Message ID | 20240717100619.108250-1-amhetre@nvidia.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [1/2] iommu: Optimize IOMMU UnMap | expand |
On 7/17/2024 3:36 PM, Ashish Mhetre wrote: > The current __arm_lpae_unmap() function calls dma_sync() on individual > PTEs after clearing them. Overall unmap performance can be improved by > around 25% for large buffer sizes by combining the syncs for adjacent > leaf entries. > This patch optimizes the unmap time by clearing all the leaf entries and > issuing a single dma_sync() for them. > Below is detailed analysis of average unmap latency(in us) with and > without this optimization obtained by running dma_map_benchmark for > different buffer sizes. > > UnMap Latency(us) > Size Without With % gain with > optimiztion optimization optimization > > 4KB 3 3 0 > 8KB 4 3.8 5 > 16KB 6.1 5.4 11.48 > 32KB 10.2 8.5 16.67 > 64KB 18.5 14.9 19.46 > 128KB 35 27.5 21.43 > 256KB 67.5 52.2 22.67 > 512KB 127.9 97.2 24.00 > 1MB 248.6 187.4 24.62 > 2MB 65.5 65.5 0 > 4MB 119.2 119 0.17 > > Signed-off-by: Ashish Mhetre <amhetre@nvidia.com> > --- > drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++------------- > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c > index f5d9fd1f45bf..1787615eec24 100644 > --- a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c > +++ b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c > @@ -274,13 +274,15 @@ static void __arm_lpae_sync_pte(arm_lpae_iopte *ptep, int num_entries, > sizeof(*ptep) * num_entries, DMA_TO_DEVICE); > } > > -static void __arm_lpae_clear_pte(arm_lpae_iopte *ptep, struct io_pgtable_cfg *cfg) > +static void __arm_lpae_clear_pte(arm_lpae_iopte *ptep, struct io_pgtable_cfg *cfg, int num_entries) > { > + int i; > > - *ptep = 0; > + for (i = 0; i < num_entries; i++) > + ptep[i] = 0; > > if (!cfg->coherent_walk) > - __arm_lpae_sync_pte(ptep, 1, cfg); > + __arm_lpae_sync_pte(ptep, num_entries, cfg); > } > > static size_t __arm_lpae_unmap(struct arm_lpae_io_pgtable *data, > @@ -635,9 +637,10 @@ static size_t __arm_lpae_unmap(struct arm_lpae_io_pgtable *data, > unsigned long iova, size_t size, size_t pgcount, > int lvl, arm_lpae_iopte *ptep) > { > + bool gather_queued; > arm_lpae_iopte pte; > struct io_pgtable *iop = &data->iop; > - int i = 0, num_entries, max_entries, unmap_idx_start; > + int i = 0, j = 0, num_entries, max_entries, unmap_idx_start; > > /* Something went horribly wrong and we ran out of page table */ > if (WARN_ON(lvl == ARM_LPAE_MAX_LEVELS)) > @@ -652,28 +655,33 @@ static size_t __arm_lpae_unmap(struct arm_lpae_io_pgtable *data, > /* If the size matches this level, we're in the right place */ > if (size == ARM_LPAE_BLOCK_SIZE(lvl, data)) { > max_entries = ARM_LPAE_PTES_PER_TABLE(data) - unmap_idx_start; > + gather_queued = iommu_iotlb_gather_queued(gather); > num_entries = min_t(int, pgcount, max_entries); > > - while (i < num_entries) { > - pte = READ_ONCE(*ptep); > + /* Find and handle non-leaf entries */ > + for (i = 0; i < num_entries; i++) { > + pte = READ_ONCE(ptep[i]); > if (WARN_ON(!pte)) > break; > > - __arm_lpae_clear_pte(ptep, &iop->cfg); > - > if (!iopte_leaf(pte, lvl, iop->fmt)) { > + __arm_lpae_clear_pte(ptep, &iop->cfg, 1); > + > /* Also flush any partial walks */ > io_pgtable_tlb_flush_walk(iop, iova + i * size, size, > ARM_LPAE_GRANULE(data)); > __arm_lpae_free_pgtable(data, lvl + 1, iopte_deref(pte, data)); > - } else if (!iommu_iotlb_gather_queued(gather)) { > - io_pgtable_tlb_add_page(iop, gather, iova + i * size, size); > } > - > - ptep++; > - i++; > } > > + /* Clear the remaining entries */ > + if (i) > + __arm_lpae_clear_pte(ptep, &iop->cfg, i); > + > + if (!gather_queued) > + for (j = 0; j < i; j++) > + io_pgtable_tlb_add_page(iop, gather, iova + j * size, size); > + > return i * size; > } else if (iopte_leaf(pte, lvl, iop->fmt)) { > /* Hi all, Can you please review the patches and provide feedback? Thanks, Ashish Mhetre
…
> This patch optimizes …
See also:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.10#n94
Regards,
Markus
On 7/29/2024 2:13 PM, Markus Elfring wrote: > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments > > > … >> This patch optimizes … > See also: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.10#n94 > > Regards, > Markus Thanks Markus, I'll update the commit message in new version. I'll wait for any other comments and address them all in next version. Thanks, Ashish Mhetre
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c index f5d9fd1f45bf..1787615eec24 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c @@ -274,13 +274,15 @@ static void __arm_lpae_sync_pte(arm_lpae_iopte *ptep, int num_entries, sizeof(*ptep) * num_entries, DMA_TO_DEVICE); } -static void __arm_lpae_clear_pte(arm_lpae_iopte *ptep, struct io_pgtable_cfg *cfg) +static void __arm_lpae_clear_pte(arm_lpae_iopte *ptep, struct io_pgtable_cfg *cfg, int num_entries) { + int i; - *ptep = 0; + for (i = 0; i < num_entries; i++) + ptep[i] = 0; if (!cfg->coherent_walk) - __arm_lpae_sync_pte(ptep, 1, cfg); + __arm_lpae_sync_pte(ptep, num_entries, cfg); } static size_t __arm_lpae_unmap(struct arm_lpae_io_pgtable *data, @@ -635,9 +637,10 @@ static size_t __arm_lpae_unmap(struct arm_lpae_io_pgtable *data, unsigned long iova, size_t size, size_t pgcount, int lvl, arm_lpae_iopte *ptep) { + bool gather_queued; arm_lpae_iopte pte; struct io_pgtable *iop = &data->iop; - int i = 0, num_entries, max_entries, unmap_idx_start; + int i = 0, j = 0, num_entries, max_entries, unmap_idx_start; /* Something went horribly wrong and we ran out of page table */ if (WARN_ON(lvl == ARM_LPAE_MAX_LEVELS)) @@ -652,28 +655,33 @@ static size_t __arm_lpae_unmap(struct arm_lpae_io_pgtable *data, /* If the size matches this level, we're in the right place */ if (size == ARM_LPAE_BLOCK_SIZE(lvl, data)) { max_entries = ARM_LPAE_PTES_PER_TABLE(data) - unmap_idx_start; + gather_queued = iommu_iotlb_gather_queued(gather); num_entries = min_t(int, pgcount, max_entries); - while (i < num_entries) { - pte = READ_ONCE(*ptep); + /* Find and handle non-leaf entries */ + for (i = 0; i < num_entries; i++) { + pte = READ_ONCE(ptep[i]); if (WARN_ON(!pte)) break; - __arm_lpae_clear_pte(ptep, &iop->cfg); - if (!iopte_leaf(pte, lvl, iop->fmt)) { + __arm_lpae_clear_pte(ptep, &iop->cfg, 1); + /* Also flush any partial walks */ io_pgtable_tlb_flush_walk(iop, iova + i * size, size, ARM_LPAE_GRANULE(data)); __arm_lpae_free_pgtable(data, lvl + 1, iopte_deref(pte, data)); - } else if (!iommu_iotlb_gather_queued(gather)) { - io_pgtable_tlb_add_page(iop, gather, iova + i * size, size); } - - ptep++; - i++; } + /* Clear the remaining entries */ + if (i) + __arm_lpae_clear_pte(ptep, &iop->cfg, i); + + if (!gather_queued) + for (j = 0; j < i; j++) + io_pgtable_tlb_add_page(iop, gather, iova + j * size, size); + return i * size; } else if (iopte_leaf(pte, lvl, iop->fmt)) { /*
The current __arm_lpae_unmap() function calls dma_sync() on individual PTEs after clearing them. Overall unmap performance can be improved by around 25% for large buffer sizes by combining the syncs for adjacent leaf entries. This patch optimizes the unmap time by clearing all the leaf entries and issuing a single dma_sync() for them. Below is detailed analysis of average unmap latency(in us) with and without this optimization obtained by running dma_map_benchmark for different buffer sizes. UnMap Latency(us) Size Without With % gain with optimiztion optimization optimization 4KB 3 3 0 8KB 4 3.8 5 16KB 6.1 5.4 11.48 32KB 10.2 8.5 16.67 64KB 18.5 14.9 19.46 128KB 35 27.5 21.43 256KB 67.5 52.2 22.67 512KB 127.9 97.2 24.00 1MB 248.6 187.4 24.62 2MB 65.5 65.5 0 4MB 119.2 119 0.17 Signed-off-by: Ashish Mhetre <amhetre@nvidia.com> --- drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)