Message ID | 20240805194424.597244-4-irogers@google.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [v1,1/5] perf test: Add build test for JEVENTS_ARCH=all | expand |
Hi Ian, I've sent a patch to fix it and the patch already merged. Thanks. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240719115018.27356-1-eric.lin@sifive.com/ Best regards, Eric Lin On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 3:44 AM Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> wrote: > > FW_SFENCE_VMA_RECEIVED is repeated twice in the file which will break > invariants in perf list as discussed in this thread: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/20240719081651.24853-1-eric.lin@sifive.com/ > > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> > --- > tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/andes/ax45/firmware.json | 3 --- > tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/sifive/u74/firmware.json | 3 --- > .../perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/starfive/dubhe-80/firmware.json | 3 --- > .../perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/thead/c900-legacy/firmware.json | 3 --- > 4 files changed, 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/andes/ax45/firmware.json b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/andes/ax45/firmware.json > index 9b4a032186a7..5a996fa4b837 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/andes/ax45/firmware.json > +++ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/andes/ax45/firmware.json > @@ -35,9 +35,6 @@ > { > "ArchStdEvent": "FW_SFENCE_VMA_RECEIVED" > }, > - { > - "ArchStdEvent": "FW_SFENCE_VMA_RECEIVED" > - }, > { > "ArchStdEvent": "FW_SFENCE_VMA_ASID_RECEIVED" > }, > diff --git a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/sifive/u74/firmware.json b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/sifive/u74/firmware.json > index 9b4a032186a7..5a996fa4b837 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/sifive/u74/firmware.json > +++ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/sifive/u74/firmware.json > @@ -35,9 +35,6 @@ > { > "ArchStdEvent": "FW_SFENCE_VMA_RECEIVED" > }, > - { > - "ArchStdEvent": "FW_SFENCE_VMA_RECEIVED" > - }, > { > "ArchStdEvent": "FW_SFENCE_VMA_ASID_RECEIVED" > }, > diff --git a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/starfive/dubhe-80/firmware.json b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/starfive/dubhe-80/firmware.json > index 9b4a032186a7..5a996fa4b837 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/starfive/dubhe-80/firmware.json > +++ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/starfive/dubhe-80/firmware.json > @@ -35,9 +35,6 @@ > { > "ArchStdEvent": "FW_SFENCE_VMA_RECEIVED" > }, > - { > - "ArchStdEvent": "FW_SFENCE_VMA_RECEIVED" > - }, > { > "ArchStdEvent": "FW_SFENCE_VMA_ASID_RECEIVED" > }, > diff --git a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/thead/c900-legacy/firmware.json b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/thead/c900-legacy/firmware.json > index 9b4a032186a7..5a996fa4b837 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/thead/c900-legacy/firmware.json > +++ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/thead/c900-legacy/firmware.json > @@ -35,9 +35,6 @@ > { > "ArchStdEvent": "FW_SFENCE_VMA_RECEIVED" > }, > - { > - "ArchStdEvent": "FW_SFENCE_VMA_RECEIVED" > - }, > { > "ArchStdEvent": "FW_SFENCE_VMA_ASID_RECEIVED" > }, > -- > 2.46.0.rc2.264.g509ed76dc8-goog >
On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 8:54 PM Eric Lin <eric.lin@sifive.com> wrote: > > Hi Ian, > > I've sent a patch to fix it and the patch already merged. Thanks. > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240719115018.27356-1-eric.lin@sifive.com/ Hi Eric/Arnaldo, Right, I already commented this should have gone through the perf-tools-next tree: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAP-5=fV3NXkKsCP1WH0_qLRNpL+WuP8S3h1=cHaUMH5MFkVHQg@mail.gmail.com/ Arnaldo, please take Eric's patch in preference to this one. Thanks, Ian
On Mon, Aug 05, 2024 at 09:05:26PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote: > On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 8:54 PM Eric Lin <eric.lin@sifive.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Ian, > > > > I've sent a patch to fix it and the patch already merged. Thanks. > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240719115018.27356-1-eric.lin@sifive.com/ > > Hi Eric/Arnaldo, > > Right, I already commented this should have gone through the > perf-tools-next tree: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAP-5=fV3NXkKsCP1WH0_qLRNpL+WuP8S3h1=cHaUMH5MFkVHQg@mail.gmail.com/ > Arnaldo, please take Eric's patch in preference to this one. So I removed your version from perf-tools-next, eventually we'll get this merged upstream, I'm just checking this isn't going to get in our way of testing what we have in perf-tools-next... - Arnaldo
On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 10:38:07AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > On Mon, Aug 05, 2024 at 09:05:26PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 8:54 PM Eric Lin <eric.lin@sifive.com> wrote: > > > I've sent a patch to fix it and the patch already merged. Thanks. > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240719115018.27356-1-eric.lin@sifive.com/ > > Right, I already commented this should have gone through the > > perf-tools-next tree: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAP-5=fV3NXkKsCP1WH0_qLRNpL+WuP8S3h1=cHaUMH5MFkVHQg@mail.gmail.com/ > > Arnaldo, please take Eric's patch in preference to this one. > So I removed your version from perf-tools-next, eventually we'll get > this merged upstream, I'm just checking this isn't going to get in our > way of testing what we have in perf-tools-next... As expected: ⬢[acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ git log --oneline -1 ; time make -C tools/perf build-test <SNIP> make_no_libdw_dwarf_unwind_O: cd . && make NO_LIBDW_DWARF_UNWIND=1 FEATURES_DUMP=/home/acme/git/perf-tools-next/tools/perf/BUILD_TEST_FEATURE_DUMP -j28 O=/tmp/tmp.1xBTPCPJh1 DESTDIR=/tmp/tmp.6upZRBhUpN make_jevents_all_O: cd . && make JEVENTS_ARCH=all FEATURES_DUMP=/home/acme/git/perf-tools-next/tools/perf/BUILD_TEST_FEATURE_DUMP -j28 O=/tmp/tmp.ncjKsS9Ddm DESTDIR=/tmp/tmp.z2lxV44jzL cd . && make JEVENTS_ARCH=all FEATURES_DUMP=/home/acme/git/perf-tools-next/tools/perf/BUILD_TEST_FEATURE_DUMP -j28 O=/tmp/tmp.ncjKsS9Ddm DESTDIR=/tmp/tmp.z2lxV44jzL BUILD: Doing 'make -j28' parallel build Warning: Kernel ABI header differences: diff -u tools/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h <SNIP> LD /tmp/tmp.ncjKsS9Ddm/util/perf-util-in.o LD /tmp/tmp.ncjKsS9Ddm/perf-util-in.o AR /tmp/tmp.ncjKsS9Ddm/libperf-util.a Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/acme/git/perf-tools-next/tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.py", line 1317, in <module> main() File "/home/acme/git/perf-tools-next/tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.py", line 1308, in main ftw(arch_path, [], process_one_file) File "/home/acme/git/perf-tools-next/tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.py", line 1245, in ftw ftw(item.path, parents + [item.name], action) File "/home/acme/git/perf-tools-next/tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.py", line 1243, in ftw action(parents, item) File "/home/acme/git/perf-tools-next/tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.py", line 646, in process_one_file print_pending_events() File "/home/acme/git/perf-tools-next/tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.py", line 510, in print_pending_events assert event.name != last_name, f"Duplicate event: {last_pmu}/{last_name}/ in {_pending_events_tblname}" ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ AssertionError: Duplicate event: default_core/fw_sfence_vma_received/ in pmu_events__andes_ax45 make[5]: *** [pmu-events/Build:46: /tmp/tmp.ncjKsS9Ddm/pmu-events/pmu-events.c] Error 1 make[5]: *** Deleting file '/tmp/tmp.ncjKsS9Ddm/pmu-events/pmu-events.c' make[4]: *** [Makefile.perf:763: /tmp/tmp.ncjKsS9Ddm/pmu-events/pmu-events-in.o] Error 2 So I'll have to cherry pick that patch and have it in perf-tools-next, we'll get notified at some point that linux-next has the same patch, will ack that, etc. Please send patches for this area in the future to the perf-tools-next tree. - Arnaldo
On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 10:38:07AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > On Mon, Aug 05, 2024 at 09:05:26PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 8:54 PM Eric Lin <eric.lin@sifive.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Ian, > > > > > > I've sent a patch to fix it and the patch already merged. Thanks. Also, already merged where? Upstream? In the riscv kernel tree? where? - Arnaldo > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240719115018.27356-1-eric.lin@sifive.com/ > > > > Hi Eric/Arnaldo, > > > > Right, I already commented this should have gone through the > > perf-tools-next tree: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAP-5=fV3NXkKsCP1WH0_qLRNpL+WuP8S3h1=cHaUMH5MFkVHQg@mail.gmail.com/ > > Arnaldo, please take Eric's patch in preference to this one. > > So I removed your version from perf-tools-next, eventually we'll get > this merged upstream, I'm just checking this isn't going to get in our > way of testing what we have in perf-tools-next... > > > - Arnaldo
Hi Arnaldo, On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 9:51 PM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 10:38:07AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 05, 2024 at 09:05:26PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 8:54 PM Eric Lin <eric.lin@sifive.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Ian, > > > > > > > > I've sent a patch to fix it and the patch already merged. Thanks. > > Also, already merged where? Upstream? In the riscv kernel tree? where? > The patch already merged to Linux upstream: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=63ba5b0fb4f54db256ec43b3062b2606b383055d Thanks. Best regards, Eric Lin > - Arnaldo > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240719115018.27356-1-eric.lin@sifive.com/ > > > > > > Hi Eric/Arnaldo, > > > > > > Right, I already commented this should have gone through the > > > perf-tools-next tree: > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAP-5=fV3NXkKsCP1WH0_qLRNpL+WuP8S3h1=cHaUMH5MFkVHQg@mail.gmail.com/ > > > Arnaldo, please take Eric's patch in preference to this one. > > > > So I removed your version from perf-tools-next, eventually we'll get > > this merged upstream, I'm just checking this isn't going to get in our > > way of testing what we have in perf-tools-next... > > > > > > - Arnaldo
On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 11:50:01PM +0800, Eric Lin wrote: > On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 9:51 PM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 10:38:07AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 05, 2024 at 09:05:26PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 8:54 PM Eric Lin <eric.lin@sifive.com> wrote: > > > > > I've sent a patch to fix it and the patch already merged. Thanks. > > Also, already merged where? Upstream? In the riscv kernel tree? where? > The patch already merged to Linux upstream: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=63ba5b0fb4f54db256ec43b3062b2606b383055d Ok, I'm resolving this with removing Ian's patch and doing a merge with upstream to pick this patch and keep perf-tools-next building. - Arnaldo
diff --git a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/andes/ax45/firmware.json b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/andes/ax45/firmware.json index 9b4a032186a7..5a996fa4b837 100644 --- a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/andes/ax45/firmware.json +++ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/andes/ax45/firmware.json @@ -35,9 +35,6 @@ { "ArchStdEvent": "FW_SFENCE_VMA_RECEIVED" }, - { - "ArchStdEvent": "FW_SFENCE_VMA_RECEIVED" - }, { "ArchStdEvent": "FW_SFENCE_VMA_ASID_RECEIVED" }, diff --git a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/sifive/u74/firmware.json b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/sifive/u74/firmware.json index 9b4a032186a7..5a996fa4b837 100644 --- a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/sifive/u74/firmware.json +++ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/sifive/u74/firmware.json @@ -35,9 +35,6 @@ { "ArchStdEvent": "FW_SFENCE_VMA_RECEIVED" }, - { - "ArchStdEvent": "FW_SFENCE_VMA_RECEIVED" - }, { "ArchStdEvent": "FW_SFENCE_VMA_ASID_RECEIVED" }, diff --git a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/starfive/dubhe-80/firmware.json b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/starfive/dubhe-80/firmware.json index 9b4a032186a7..5a996fa4b837 100644 --- a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/starfive/dubhe-80/firmware.json +++ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/starfive/dubhe-80/firmware.json @@ -35,9 +35,6 @@ { "ArchStdEvent": "FW_SFENCE_VMA_RECEIVED" }, - { - "ArchStdEvent": "FW_SFENCE_VMA_RECEIVED" - }, { "ArchStdEvent": "FW_SFENCE_VMA_ASID_RECEIVED" }, diff --git a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/thead/c900-legacy/firmware.json b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/thead/c900-legacy/firmware.json index 9b4a032186a7..5a996fa4b837 100644 --- a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/thead/c900-legacy/firmware.json +++ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/thead/c900-legacy/firmware.json @@ -35,9 +35,6 @@ { "ArchStdEvent": "FW_SFENCE_VMA_RECEIVED" }, - { - "ArchStdEvent": "FW_SFENCE_VMA_RECEIVED" - }, { "ArchStdEvent": "FW_SFENCE_VMA_ASID_RECEIVED" },
FW_SFENCE_VMA_RECEIVED is repeated twice in the file which will break invariants in perf list as discussed in this thread: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/20240719081651.24853-1-eric.lin@sifive.com/ Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> --- tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/andes/ax45/firmware.json | 3 --- tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/sifive/u74/firmware.json | 3 --- .../perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/starfive/dubhe-80/firmware.json | 3 --- .../perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/thead/c900-legacy/firmware.json | 3 --- 4 files changed, 12 deletions(-)