Message ID | 20240806003539.3292562-5-gitster@pobox.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | make "too many arguments" a bit more useful | expand |
On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 8:36 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote: > Imagine seeing your command failing with "too many arguments" when > you run "git cmd foo bar baz". Can you tell it will work if you > said "git cmd foo bar"? Or is that trimming your command line too > much? Too little? > > Instead, if the command reports "unknown argument: 'bar'", you'd know > that "bar" and everything after it is unwanted. > > Let's make it so for a few remaining commands. > > Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> > --- > diff --git a/builtin/receive-pack.c b/builtin/receive-pack.c > @@ -2503,7 +2503,8 @@ int cmd_receive_pack(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) > if (argc > 1) > - usage_msg_opt(_("too many arguments"), receive_pack_usage, options); > + usage_msg_optf(_("unknown argument: '%s'"), > + receive_pack_usage, options, argv[0]); Is this supposed to be referencing `argv[1]` rather than `argv[0]`... > diff --git a/builtin/tag.c b/builtin/tag.c > @@ -641,7 +641,7 @@ int cmd_tag(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) > if (argc > 2) > - die(_("too many arguments")); > + die(_("unknown argument: '%s'"), argv[2]); ...similar to how this references `argv[2]` when the condition is `argc > 2`?
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> writes: > On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 8:36 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote: >> Imagine seeing your command failing with "too many arguments" when >> you run "git cmd foo bar baz". Can you tell it will work if you >> said "git cmd foo bar"? Or is that trimming your command line too >> much? Too little? >> >> Instead, if the command reports "unknown argument: 'bar'", you'd know >> that "bar" and everything after it is unwanted. >> >> Let's make it so for a few remaining commands. >> >> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> >> --- >> diff --git a/builtin/receive-pack.c b/builtin/receive-pack.c >> @@ -2503,7 +2503,8 @@ int cmd_receive_pack(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) >> if (argc > 1) >> - usage_msg_opt(_("too many arguments"), receive_pack_usage, options); >> + usage_msg_optf(_("unknown argument: '%s'"), >> + receive_pack_usage, options, argv[0]); > > Is this supposed to be referencing `argv[1]` rather than `argv[0]`... You are right. To the command, the first argument is acceptable, and the unexpected ones are the second and later ones, so argv[1] is what it should have said. > >> diff --git a/builtin/tag.c b/builtin/tag.c >> @@ -641,7 +641,7 @@ int cmd_tag(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) >> if (argc > 2) >> - die(_("too many arguments")); >> + die(_("unknown argument: '%s'"), argv[2]); > > ...similar to how this references `argv[2]` when the condition is `argc > 2`? Yes.
diff --git a/builtin/prune-packed.c b/builtin/prune-packed.c index ca3578e158..46989e12f9 100644 --- a/builtin/prune-packed.c +++ b/builtin/prune-packed.c @@ -23,9 +23,9 @@ int cmd_prune_packed(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) prune_packed_usage, 0); if (argc > 0) - usage_msg_opt(_("too many arguments"), - prune_packed_usage, - prune_packed_options); + usage_msg_optf(_("unknown argument: '%s'"), + prune_packed_usage, prune_packed_options, + argv[0]); prune_packed_objects(opts); return 0; diff --git a/builtin/receive-pack.c b/builtin/receive-pack.c index 339524ae2a..e49f4ea4dd 100644 --- a/builtin/receive-pack.c +++ b/builtin/receive-pack.c @@ -2503,7 +2503,8 @@ int cmd_receive_pack(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) argc = parse_options(argc, argv, prefix, options, receive_pack_usage, 0); if (argc > 1) - usage_msg_opt(_("too many arguments"), receive_pack_usage, options); + usage_msg_optf(_("unknown argument: '%s'"), + receive_pack_usage, options, argv[0]); if (argc == 0) usage_msg_opt(_("you must specify a directory"), receive_pack_usage, options); diff --git a/builtin/tag.c b/builtin/tag.c index a1fb218512..274bd0e6ce 100644 --- a/builtin/tag.c +++ b/builtin/tag.c @@ -641,7 +641,7 @@ int cmd_tag(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) object_ref = argc == 2 ? argv[1] : "HEAD"; if (argc > 2) - die(_("too many arguments")); + die(_("unknown argument: '%s'"), argv[2]); if (repo_get_oid(the_repository, object_ref, &object)) die(_("Failed to resolve '%s' as a valid ref."), object_ref);
Imagine seeing your command failing with "too many arguments" when you run "git cmd foo bar baz". Can you tell it will work if you said "git cmd foo bar"? Or is that trimming your command line too much? Too little? Instead, if the command reports "unknown argument: 'bar'", you'd know that "bar" and everything after it is unwanted. Let's make it so for a few remaining commands. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> --- builtin/prune-packed.c | 6 +++--- builtin/receive-pack.c | 3 ++- builtin/tag.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)