Message ID | 87ipdnein1.fsf@ti.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> wrote: > Subject: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add entry OMAP GPIO driver > > Since I've been maintaining this, making it official at the request of the > GPIO maintainers. > > Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> > Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> Thank! Applied, but: > +F: drivers/gpio/gpio.omap.c I replaced the period with a dash: drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c Yours, Linus Walleij
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> writes: > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> wrote: > >> Subject: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add entry OMAP GPIO driver >> >> Since I've been maintaining this, making it official at the request of the >> GPIO maintainers. >> >> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> >> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> >> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> >> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> >> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> > > Thank! Applied, but: > >> +F: drivers/gpio/gpio.omap.c > > I replaced the period with a dash: > drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c Ah, you caught me again trying to avoid getting mail for that driver. ;) Kevin
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> wrote: > > Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> writes: > > > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> wrote: > > > >> In the case of OMAP GPIO, unless it's an obvious fix, I would recommend > >> you wait at least until you see some acks/tested tags from any of > >> > >> - Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> > >> - Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com> > >> - Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com> > >> > >> or Tony, Paul or myself. > > > > Instead of trying to store this information in my and Grants brains and > > us forgetting it, what about patching MAINTAINERS to reflect the fact > > instead? That's better I think, plus I use that file a lot. > > > >> For major series, I have been collecting/queueing them for Grant after > >> ensuring they have been well reviewed and well tested (although I am > >> eagerly hoping to hand off this role to someone else.) > > > > Listing it under your GIT tree in MAINTAINERS for this driver will make > > this work better I think. > > > > One path for OMAP GPIO patches, simple. It's obviously the > > ambiguity that cause the trouble. Then you can also decide > > on each cycle whether to send these to GPIO or ARM SoC > > etc. > > Yeah, I understand the process, but I've been avoiding doing that > because, well, I don't want the job. I have been trying to get someone > else at TI to maintain this driver, but have not been successful. > > So, until that happens, feel free to queue up the patch below. > > Santosh, note that I've put you as co-maintainer of this driver. > No problem Kevin. Regards Santosh
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 03df1d1..61d117a 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -4943,6 +4943,13 @@ S: Maintained F: drivers/usb/*/*omap* F: arch/arm/*omap*/usb* +OMAP GPIO DRIVER +M: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> +M: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> +L: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org +S: Maintained +F: drivers/gpio/gpio.omap.c + OMFS FILESYSTEM M: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com> L: linux-karma-devel@lists.sourceforge.net