diff mbox series

[RESEND,v2] Bluetooth: SMP: Fix assumption of Central always being Initiator

Message ID 20240813144559.529786-1-luiz.dentz@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit a7e36fd74c874577a9a25243a24572ce2d5e4f8c
Headers show
Series [RESEND,v2] Bluetooth: SMP: Fix assumption of Central always being Initiator | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
tedd_an/pre-ci_am success Success
tedd_an/CheckPatch success CheckPatch PASS
tedd_an/GitLint success Gitlint PASS
tedd_an/SubjectPrefix success Gitlint PASS
tedd_an/BuildKernel success BuildKernel PASS
tedd_an/CheckAllWarning success CheckAllWarning PASS
tedd_an/CheckSparse success CheckSparse PASS
tedd_an/CheckSmatch success CheckSparse PASS
tedd_an/BuildKernel32 success BuildKernel32 PASS
tedd_an/TestRunnerSetup success TestRunnerSetup PASS
tedd_an/TestRunner_l2cap-tester success TestRunner PASS
tedd_an/TestRunner_iso-tester success TestRunner PASS
tedd_an/TestRunner_bnep-tester success TestRunner PASS
tedd_an/TestRunner_mgmt-tester success TestRunner PASS
tedd_an/TestRunner_rfcomm-tester success TestRunner PASS
tedd_an/TestRunner_sco-tester success TestRunner PASS
tedd_an/TestRunner_ioctl-tester success TestRunner PASS
tedd_an/TestRunner_mesh-tester success TestRunner PASS
tedd_an/TestRunner_smp-tester success TestRunner PASS
tedd_an/TestRunner_userchan-tester success TestRunner PASS
tedd_an/IncrementalBuild success Incremental Build PASS

Commit Message

Luiz Augusto von Dentz Aug. 13, 2024, 2:45 p.m. UTC 
From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>

SMP initiator role shall be considered the one that initiates the
pairing procedure with SMP_CMD_PAIRING_REQ:

BLUETOOTH CORE SPECIFICATION Version 5.3 | Vol 3, Part H
page 1557:

Figure 2.1: LE pairing phases

Note that by sending SMP_CMD_SECURITY_REQ it doesn't change the role to
be Initiator.

Link: https://github.com/bluez/bluez/issues/567
Fixes: b28b4943660f ("Bluetooth: Add strict checks for allowed SMP PDUs")
Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
---
 net/bluetooth/smp.c | 146 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)

Comments

bluez.test.bot@gmail.com Aug. 13, 2024, 3:35 p.m. UTC | #1 
This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!

Dear submitter,

Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list.
This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=879268

---Test result---

Test Summary:
CheckPatch                    PASS      0.98 seconds
GitLint                       PASS      0.35 seconds
SubjectPrefix                 PASS      0.14 seconds
BuildKernel                   PASS      30.01 seconds
CheckAllWarning               PASS      32.02 seconds
CheckSparse                   PASS      37.51 seconds
CheckSmatch                   PASS      103.75 seconds
BuildKernel32                 PASS      28.69 seconds
TestRunnerSetup               PASS      528.11 seconds
TestRunner_l2cap-tester       PASS      19.98 seconds
TestRunner_iso-tester         PASS      34.86 seconds
TestRunner_bnep-tester        PASS      4.89 seconds
TestRunner_mgmt-tester        PASS      114.91 seconds
TestRunner_rfcomm-tester      PASS      7.49 seconds
TestRunner_sco-tester         PASS      15.19 seconds
TestRunner_ioctl-tester       PASS      7.91 seconds
TestRunner_mesh-tester        PASS      8.31 seconds
TestRunner_smp-tester         PASS      7.00 seconds
TestRunner_userchan-tester    PASS      5.07 seconds
IncrementalBuild              PASS      27.72 seconds



---
Regards,
Linux Bluetooth
patchwork-bot+bluetooth@kernel.org Aug. 15, 2024, 4 p.m. UTC | #2 
Hello:

This patch was applied to bluetooth/bluetooth-next.git (master)
by Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>:

On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 10:45:59 -0400 you wrote:
> From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
> 
> SMP initiator role shall be considered the one that initiates the
> pairing procedure with SMP_CMD_PAIRING_REQ:
> 
> BLUETOOTH CORE SPECIFICATION Version 5.3 | Vol 3, Part H
> page 1557:
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [RESEND,v2] Bluetooth: SMP: Fix assumption of Central always being Initiator
    https://git.kernel.org/bluetooth/bluetooth-next/c/a7e36fd74c87

You are awesome, thank you!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/net/bluetooth/smp.c b/net/bluetooth/smp.c
index 1e7ea3a4b7ef..4f9fdf400584 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/smp.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/smp.c
@@ -914,7 +914,7 @@  static int tk_request(struct l2cap_conn *conn, u8 remote_oob, u8 auth,
 	 * Confirms and the responder Enters the passkey.
 	 */
 	if (smp->method == OVERLAP) {
-		if (hcon->role == HCI_ROLE_MASTER)
+		if (test_bit(SMP_FLAG_INITIATOR, &smp->flags))
 			smp->method = CFM_PASSKEY;
 		else
 			smp->method = REQ_PASSKEY;
@@ -964,7 +964,7 @@  static u8 smp_confirm(struct smp_chan *smp)
 
 	smp_send_cmd(smp->conn, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_CONFIRM, sizeof(cp), &cp);
 
-	if (conn->hcon->out)
+	if (test_bit(SMP_FLAG_INITIATOR, &smp->flags))
 		SMP_ALLOW_CMD(smp, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_CONFIRM);
 	else
 		SMP_ALLOW_CMD(smp, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_RANDOM);
@@ -980,7 +980,8 @@  static u8 smp_random(struct smp_chan *smp)
 	int ret;
 
 	bt_dev_dbg(conn->hcon->hdev, "conn %p %s", conn,
-		   conn->hcon->out ? "initiator" : "responder");
+		   test_bit(SMP_FLAG_INITIATOR, &smp->flags) ? "initiator" :
+		   "responder");
 
 	ret = smp_c1(smp->tk, smp->rrnd, smp->preq, smp->prsp,
 		     hcon->init_addr_type, &hcon->init_addr,
@@ -994,7 +995,7 @@  static u8 smp_random(struct smp_chan *smp)
 		return SMP_CONFIRM_FAILED;
 	}
 
-	if (hcon->out) {
+	if (test_bit(SMP_FLAG_INITIATOR, &smp->flags)) {
 		u8 stk[16];
 		__le64 rand = 0;
 		__le16 ediv = 0;
@@ -1256,14 +1257,15 @@  static void smp_distribute_keys(struct smp_chan *smp)
 	rsp = (void *) &smp->prsp[1];
 
 	/* The responder sends its keys first */
-	if (hcon->out && (smp->remote_key_dist & KEY_DIST_MASK)) {
+	if (test_bit(SMP_FLAG_INITIATOR, &smp->flags) &&
+	    (smp->remote_key_dist & KEY_DIST_MASK)) {
 		smp_allow_key_dist(smp);
 		return;
 	}
 
 	req = (void *) &smp->preq[1];
 
-	if (hcon->out) {
+	if (test_bit(SMP_FLAG_INITIATOR, &smp->flags)) {
 		keydist = &rsp->init_key_dist;
 		*keydist &= req->init_key_dist;
 	} else {
@@ -1432,7 +1434,7 @@  static int sc_mackey_and_ltk(struct smp_chan *smp, u8 mackey[16], u8 ltk[16])
 	struct hci_conn *hcon = smp->conn->hcon;
 	u8 *na, *nb, a[7], b[7];
 
-	if (hcon->out) {
+	if (test_bit(SMP_FLAG_INITIATOR, &smp->flags)) {
 		na   = smp->prnd;
 		nb   = smp->rrnd;
 	} else {
@@ -1460,7 +1462,7 @@  static void sc_dhkey_check(struct smp_chan *smp)
 	a[6] = hcon->init_addr_type;
 	b[6] = hcon->resp_addr_type;
 
-	if (hcon->out) {
+	if (test_bit(SMP_FLAG_INITIATOR, &smp->flags)) {
 		local_addr = a;
 		remote_addr = b;
 		memcpy(io_cap, &smp->preq[1], 3);
@@ -1539,7 +1541,7 @@  static u8 sc_passkey_round(struct smp_chan *smp, u8 smp_op)
 		/* The round is only complete when the initiator
 		 * receives pairing random.
 		 */
-		if (!hcon->out) {
+		if (!test_bit(SMP_FLAG_INITIATOR, &smp->flags)) {
 			smp_send_cmd(conn, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_RANDOM,
 				     sizeof(smp->prnd), smp->prnd);
 			if (smp->passkey_round == 20)
@@ -1567,7 +1569,7 @@  static u8 sc_passkey_round(struct smp_chan *smp, u8 smp_op)
 
 		SMP_ALLOW_CMD(smp, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_RANDOM);
 
-		if (hcon->out) {
+		if (test_bit(SMP_FLAG_INITIATOR, &smp->flags)) {
 			smp_send_cmd(conn, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_RANDOM,
 				     sizeof(smp->prnd), smp->prnd);
 			return 0;
@@ -1578,7 +1580,7 @@  static u8 sc_passkey_round(struct smp_chan *smp, u8 smp_op)
 	case SMP_CMD_PUBLIC_KEY:
 	default:
 		/* Initiating device starts the round */
-		if (!hcon->out)
+		if (!test_bit(SMP_FLAG_INITIATOR, &smp->flags))
 			return 0;
 
 		bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "Starting passkey round %u",
@@ -1623,7 +1625,7 @@  static int sc_user_reply(struct smp_chan *smp, u16 mgmt_op, __le32 passkey)
 	}
 
 	/* Initiator sends DHKey check first */
-	if (hcon->out) {
+	if (test_bit(SMP_FLAG_INITIATOR, &smp->flags)) {
 		sc_dhkey_check(smp);
 		SMP_ALLOW_CMD(smp, SMP_CMD_DHKEY_CHECK);
 	} else if (test_and_clear_bit(SMP_FLAG_DHKEY_PENDING, &smp->flags)) {
@@ -1746,7 +1748,7 @@  static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	struct smp_cmd_pairing rsp, *req = (void *) skb->data;
 	struct l2cap_chan *chan = conn->smp;
 	struct hci_dev *hdev = conn->hcon->hdev;
-	struct smp_chan *smp;
+	struct smp_chan *smp = chan->data;
 	u8 key_size, auth, sec_level;
 	int ret;
 
@@ -1755,16 +1757,14 @@  static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	if (skb->len < sizeof(*req))
 		return SMP_INVALID_PARAMS;
 
-	if (conn->hcon->role != HCI_ROLE_SLAVE)
+	if (smp && test_bit(SMP_FLAG_INITIATOR, &smp->flags))
 		return SMP_CMD_NOTSUPP;
 
-	if (!chan->data)
+	if (!smp) {
 		smp = smp_chan_create(conn);
-	else
-		smp = chan->data;
-
-	if (!smp)
-		return SMP_UNSPECIFIED;
+		if (!smp)
+			return SMP_UNSPECIFIED;
+	}
 
 	/* We didn't start the pairing, so match remote */
 	auth = req->auth_req & AUTH_REQ_MASK(hdev);
@@ -1946,7 +1946,7 @@  static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_rsp(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	if (skb->len < sizeof(*rsp))
 		return SMP_INVALID_PARAMS;
 
-	if (conn->hcon->role != HCI_ROLE_MASTER)
+	if (!test_bit(SMP_FLAG_INITIATOR, &smp->flags))
 		return SMP_CMD_NOTSUPP;
 
 	skb_pull(skb, sizeof(*rsp));
@@ -2041,7 +2041,7 @@  static u8 sc_check_confirm(struct smp_chan *smp)
 	if (smp->method == REQ_PASSKEY || smp->method == DSP_PASSKEY)
 		return sc_passkey_round(smp, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_CONFIRM);
 
-	if (conn->hcon->out) {
+	if (test_bit(SMP_FLAG_INITIATOR, &smp->flags)) {
 		smp_send_cmd(conn, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_RANDOM, sizeof(smp->prnd),
 			     smp->prnd);
 		SMP_ALLOW_CMD(smp, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_RANDOM);
@@ -2063,7 +2063,7 @@  static int fixup_sc_false_positive(struct smp_chan *smp)
 	u8 auth;
 
 	/* The issue is only observed when we're in responder role */
-	if (hcon->out)
+	if (test_bit(SMP_FLAG_INITIATOR, &smp->flags))
 		return SMP_UNSPECIFIED;
 
 	if (hci_dev_test_flag(hdev, HCI_SC_ONLY)) {
@@ -2099,7 +2099,8 @@  static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_confirm(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	struct hci_dev *hdev = hcon->hdev;
 
 	bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "conn %p %s", conn,
-		   hcon->out ? "initiator" : "responder");
+		   test_bit(SMP_FLAG_INITIATOR, &smp->flags) ? "initiator" :
+		   "responder");
 
 	if (skb->len < sizeof(smp->pcnf))
 		return SMP_INVALID_PARAMS;
@@ -2121,7 +2122,7 @@  static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_confirm(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
 			return ret;
 	}
 
-	if (conn->hcon->out) {
+	if (test_bit(SMP_FLAG_INITIATOR, &smp->flags)) {
 		smp_send_cmd(conn, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_RANDOM, sizeof(smp->prnd),
 			     smp->prnd);
 		SMP_ALLOW_CMD(smp, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_RANDOM);
@@ -2156,7 +2157,7 @@  static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_random(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	if (!test_bit(SMP_FLAG_SC, &smp->flags))
 		return smp_random(smp);
 
-	if (hcon->out) {
+	if (test_bit(SMP_FLAG_INITIATOR, &smp->flags)) {
 		pkax = smp->local_pk;
 		pkbx = smp->remote_pk;
 		na   = smp->prnd;
@@ -2169,7 +2170,7 @@  static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_random(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	}
 
 	if (smp->method == REQ_OOB) {
-		if (!hcon->out)
+		if (!test_bit(SMP_FLAG_INITIATOR, &smp->flags))
 			smp_send_cmd(conn, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_RANDOM,
 				     sizeof(smp->prnd), smp->prnd);
 		SMP_ALLOW_CMD(smp, SMP_CMD_DHKEY_CHECK);
@@ -2180,7 +2181,7 @@  static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_random(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	if (smp->method == REQ_PASSKEY || smp->method == DSP_PASSKEY)
 		return sc_passkey_round(smp, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_RANDOM);
 
-	if (hcon->out) {
+	if (test_bit(SMP_FLAG_INITIATOR, &smp->flags)) {
 		u8 cfm[16];
 
 		err = smp_f4(smp->tfm_cmac, smp->remote_pk, smp->local_pk,
@@ -2221,7 +2222,7 @@  static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_random(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
 		return SMP_UNSPECIFIED;
 
 	if (smp->method == REQ_OOB) {
-		if (hcon->out) {
+		if (test_bit(SMP_FLAG_INITIATOR, &smp->flags)) {
 			sc_dhkey_check(smp);
 			SMP_ALLOW_CMD(smp, SMP_CMD_DHKEY_CHECK);
 		}
@@ -2295,10 +2296,27 @@  bool smp_sufficient_security(struct hci_conn *hcon, u8 sec_level,
 	return false;
 }
 
+static void smp_send_pairing_req(struct smp_chan *smp, __u8 auth)
+{
+	struct smp_cmd_pairing cp;
+
+	if (smp->conn->hcon->type == ACL_LINK)
+		build_bredr_pairing_cmd(smp, &cp, NULL);
+	else
+		build_pairing_cmd(smp->conn, &cp, NULL, auth);
+
+	smp->preq[0] = SMP_CMD_PAIRING_REQ;
+	memcpy(&smp->preq[1], &cp, sizeof(cp));
+
+	smp_send_cmd(smp->conn, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_REQ, sizeof(cp), &cp);
+	SMP_ALLOW_CMD(smp, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_RSP);
+
+	set_bit(SMP_FLAG_INITIATOR, &smp->flags);
+}
+
 static u8 smp_cmd_security_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
 	struct smp_cmd_security_req *rp = (void *) skb->data;
-	struct smp_cmd_pairing cp;
 	struct hci_conn *hcon = conn->hcon;
 	struct hci_dev *hdev = hcon->hdev;
 	struct smp_chan *smp;
@@ -2347,18 +2365,22 @@  static u8 smp_cmd_security_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
 
 	skb_pull(skb, sizeof(*rp));
 
-	memset(&cp, 0, sizeof(cp));
-	build_pairing_cmd(conn, &cp, NULL, auth);
-
-	smp->preq[0] = SMP_CMD_PAIRING_REQ;
-	memcpy(&smp->preq[1], &cp, sizeof(cp));
-
-	smp_send_cmd(conn, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_REQ, sizeof(cp), &cp);
-	SMP_ALLOW_CMD(smp, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_RSP);
+	smp_send_pairing_req(smp, auth);
 
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void smp_send_security_req(struct smp_chan *smp, __u8 auth)
+{
+	struct smp_cmd_security_req cp;
+
+	cp.auth_req = auth;
+	smp_send_cmd(smp->conn, SMP_CMD_SECURITY_REQ, sizeof(cp), &cp);
+	SMP_ALLOW_CMD(smp, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_REQ);
+
+	clear_bit(SMP_FLAG_INITIATOR, &smp->flags);
+}
+
 int smp_conn_security(struct hci_conn *hcon, __u8 sec_level)
 {
 	struct l2cap_conn *conn = hcon->l2cap_data;
@@ -2427,23 +2449,11 @@  int smp_conn_security(struct hci_conn *hcon, __u8 sec_level)
 			authreq |= SMP_AUTH_MITM;
 	}
 
-	if (hcon->role == HCI_ROLE_MASTER) {
-		struct smp_cmd_pairing cp;
+	if (hcon->role == HCI_ROLE_MASTER)
+		smp_send_pairing_req(smp, authreq);
+	else
+		smp_send_security_req(smp, authreq);
 
-		build_pairing_cmd(conn, &cp, NULL, authreq);
-		smp->preq[0] = SMP_CMD_PAIRING_REQ;
-		memcpy(&smp->preq[1], &cp, sizeof(cp));
-
-		smp_send_cmd(conn, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_REQ, sizeof(cp), &cp);
-		SMP_ALLOW_CMD(smp, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_RSP);
-	} else {
-		struct smp_cmd_security_req cp;
-		cp.auth_req = authreq;
-		smp_send_cmd(conn, SMP_CMD_SECURITY_REQ, sizeof(cp), &cp);
-		SMP_ALLOW_CMD(smp, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_REQ);
-	}
-
-	set_bit(SMP_FLAG_INITIATOR, &smp->flags);
 	ret = 0;
 
 unlock:
@@ -2694,8 +2704,6 @@  static int smp_cmd_sign_info(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
 
 static u8 sc_select_method(struct smp_chan *smp)
 {
-	struct l2cap_conn *conn = smp->conn;
-	struct hci_conn *hcon = conn->hcon;
 	struct smp_cmd_pairing *local, *remote;
 	u8 local_mitm, remote_mitm, local_io, remote_io, method;
 
@@ -2708,7 +2716,7 @@  static u8 sc_select_method(struct smp_chan *smp)
 	 * the "struct smp_cmd_pairing" from them we need to skip the
 	 * first byte which contains the opcode.
 	 */
-	if (hcon->out) {
+	if (test_bit(SMP_FLAG_INITIATOR, &smp->flags)) {
 		local = (void *) &smp->preq[1];
 		remote = (void *) &smp->prsp[1];
 	} else {
@@ -2777,7 +2785,7 @@  static int smp_cmd_public_key(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	/* Non-initiating device sends its public key after receiving
 	 * the key from the initiating device.
 	 */
-	if (!hcon->out) {
+	if (!test_bit(SMP_FLAG_INITIATOR, &smp->flags)) {
 		err = sc_send_public_key(smp);
 		if (err)
 			return err;
@@ -2839,7 +2847,7 @@  static int smp_cmd_public_key(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	}
 
 	if (smp->method == REQ_OOB) {
-		if (hcon->out)
+		if (test_bit(SMP_FLAG_INITIATOR, &smp->flags))
 			smp_send_cmd(conn, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_RANDOM,
 				     sizeof(smp->prnd), smp->prnd);
 
@@ -2848,7 +2856,7 @@  static int smp_cmd_public_key(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	if (hcon->out)
+	if (test_bit(SMP_FLAG_INITIATOR, &smp->flags))
 		SMP_ALLOW_CMD(smp, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_CONFIRM);
 
 	if (smp->method == REQ_PASSKEY) {
@@ -2863,7 +2871,7 @@  static int smp_cmd_public_key(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	/* The Initiating device waits for the non-initiating device to
 	 * send the confirm value.
 	 */
-	if (conn->hcon->out)
+	if (test_bit(SMP_FLAG_INITIATOR, &smp->flags))
 		return 0;
 
 	err = smp_f4(smp->tfm_cmac, smp->local_pk, smp->remote_pk, smp->prnd,
@@ -2897,7 +2905,7 @@  static int smp_cmd_dhkey_check(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	a[6] = hcon->init_addr_type;
 	b[6] = hcon->resp_addr_type;
 
-	if (hcon->out) {
+	if (test_bit(SMP_FLAG_INITIATOR, &smp->flags)) {
 		local_addr = a;
 		remote_addr = b;
 		memcpy(io_cap, &smp->prsp[1], 3);
@@ -2922,7 +2930,7 @@  static int smp_cmd_dhkey_check(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	if (crypto_memneq(check->e, e, 16))
 		return SMP_DHKEY_CHECK_FAILED;
 
-	if (!hcon->out) {
+	if (!test_bit(SMP_FLAG_INITIATOR, &smp->flags)) {
 		if (test_bit(SMP_FLAG_WAIT_USER, &smp->flags)) {
 			set_bit(SMP_FLAG_DHKEY_PENDING, &smp->flags);
 			return 0;
@@ -2934,7 +2942,7 @@  static int smp_cmd_dhkey_check(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
 
 	sc_add_ltk(smp);
 
-	if (hcon->out) {
+	if (test_bit(SMP_FLAG_INITIATOR, &smp->flags)) {
 		hci_le_start_enc(hcon, 0, 0, smp->tk, smp->enc_key_size);
 		hcon->enc_key_size = smp->enc_key_size;
 	}
@@ -3083,7 +3091,6 @@  static void bredr_pairing(struct l2cap_chan *chan)
 	struct l2cap_conn *conn = chan->conn;
 	struct hci_conn *hcon = conn->hcon;
 	struct hci_dev *hdev = hcon->hdev;
-	struct smp_cmd_pairing req;
 	struct smp_chan *smp;
 
 	bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "chan %p", chan);
@@ -3135,14 +3142,7 @@  static void bredr_pairing(struct l2cap_chan *chan)
 
 	bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "starting SMP over BR/EDR");
 
-	/* Prepare and send the BR/EDR SMP Pairing Request */
-	build_bredr_pairing_cmd(smp, &req, NULL);
-
-	smp->preq[0] = SMP_CMD_PAIRING_REQ;
-	memcpy(&smp->preq[1], &req, sizeof(req));
-
-	smp_send_cmd(conn, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_REQ, sizeof(req), &req);
-	SMP_ALLOW_CMD(smp, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_RSP);
+	smp_send_pairing_req(smp, 0x00);
 }
 
 static void smp_resume_cb(struct l2cap_chan *chan)