Message ID | 20240816164238.1902-2-shiju.jose@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | EDAC: Scrub: introduce generic EDAC RAS control feature driver + CXL/ACPI-RAS2 drivers | expand |
Hi, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on ras/edac-for-next] [also build test WARNING on rafael-pm/linux-next rafael-pm/bleeding-edge cxl/next linus/master cxl/pending v6.11-rc3 next-20240816] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/shiju-jose-huawei-com/EDAC-Add-support-for-EDAC-device-feature-s-control/20240817-004442 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ras/ras.git edac-for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240816164238.1902-2-shiju.jose%40huawei.com patch subject: [PATCH v11 01/14] EDAC: Add support for EDAC device feature's control config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-003-20240818 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240818/202408181416.PD0B8fMf-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 18.1.5 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 617a15a9eac96088ae5e9134248d8236e34b91b1) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240818/202408181416.PD0B8fMf-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202408181416.PD0B8fMf-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/edac/edac_device.c:608: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'ras_feat' not described in 'edac_dev_feat_init' >> drivers/edac/edac_device.c:608: warning: expecting prototype for edac_dev_feature_init(). Prototype was for edac_dev_feat_init() instead vim +608 drivers/edac/edac_device.c 593 594 /** 595 * edac_dev_feature_init - Init a ras feature 596 * @parent: client device. 597 * @dev_data: pointer to struct edac_dev_data. 598 * @feat: pointer to struct edac_dev_feature. 599 * @attr_groups: pointer to attribute group's container. 600 * 601 * Returns number of scrub feature's attribute groups on success, 602 * error otherwise. 603 */ 604 static int edac_dev_feat_init(struct device *parent, 605 struct edac_dev_data *dev_data, 606 const struct edac_dev_feature *ras_feat, 607 const struct attribute_group **attr_groups) > 608 { 609 int num; 610 611 switch (ras_feat->feat) { 612 case RAS_FEAT_SCRUB: 613 dev_data->scrub_ops = ras_feat->scrub_ops; 614 dev_data->private = ras_feat->scrub_ctx; 615 return 1; 616 case RAS_FEAT_ECS: 617 num = ras_feat->ecs_info.num_media_frus; 618 dev_data->ecs_ops = ras_feat->ecs_ops; 619 dev_data->private = ras_feat->ecs_ctx; 620 return num; 621 case RAS_FEAT_PPR: 622 dev_data->ppr_ops = ras_feat->ppr_ops; 623 dev_data->private = ras_feat->ppr_ctx; 624 return 1; 625 default: 626 return -EINVAL; 627 } 628 } 629
Hi, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on ras/edac-for-next] [also build test WARNING on rafael-pm/linux-next rafael-pm/bleeding-edge cxl/next linus/master cxl/pending v6.11-rc3 next-20240816] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/shiju-jose-huawei-com/EDAC-Add-support-for-EDAC-device-feature-s-control/20240817-004442 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ras/ras.git edac-for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240816164238.1902-2-shiju.jose%40huawei.com patch subject: [PATCH v11 01/14] EDAC: Add support for EDAC device feature's control config: i386-randconfig-062-20240818 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240819/202408190825.fBBO0NTN-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240819/202408190825.fBBO0NTN-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202408190825.fBBO0NTN-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> drivers/edac/edac_device.c:584:26: sparse: sparse: symbol 'edac_dev_type' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/edac/edac_device.c: note: in included file (through include/linux/smp.h, include/linux/lockdep.h, include/linux/spinlock.h, ...): include/linux/list.h:83:21: sparse: sparse: self-comparison always evaluates to true vim +/edac_dev_type +584 drivers/edac/edac_device.c 583 > 584 const struct device_type edac_dev_type = { 585 .name = "edac_dev", 586 .release = edac_dev_release, 587 }; 588
On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 05:42:24PM +0100, shiju.jose@huawei.com wrote: > From: Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@huawei.com> > > Add generic EDAC device feature's control supports registering "features" Check your whole set. > RAS features supported in the system. Driver exposes feature's > control attributes to the userspace in s/the // > /sys/bus/edac/devices/<dev-name>/<ras-feature>/ > > Co-developed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> > Signed-off-by: Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@huawei.com> > --- > drivers/edac/edac_device.c | 178 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/edac.h | 60 +++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 238 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_device.c b/drivers/edac/edac_device.c > index 621dc2a5d034..635a41db8b5a 100644 > --- a/drivers/edac/edac_device.c > +++ b/drivers/edac/edac_device.c > @@ -570,3 +570,181 @@ void edac_device_handle_ue_count(struct edac_device_ctl_info *edac_dev, > block ? block->name : "N/A", count, msg); > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(edac_device_handle_ue_count); > + > +/* EDAC device feature */ > +static void edac_dev_release(struct device *dev) > +{ > + struct edac_dev_feat_ctx *ctx = > + container_of(dev, struct edac_dev_feat_ctx, dev); Ew, no, don't do such silly linebreaks pls. > + kfree(ctx->dev.groups); > + kfree(ctx); > +} > + > +const struct device_type edac_dev_type = { > + .name = "edac_dev", > + .release = edac_dev_release, > +}; > + > +static void edac_dev_unreg(void *data) > +{ > + device_unregister(data); > +} > + > +/** > + * edac_dev_feature_init - Init a ras feature s/ras/RAS/g Check your whole set. > + * @parent: client device. > + * @dev_data: pointer to struct edac_dev_data. I can see it is a pointer. What it is used for? > + * @feat: pointer to struct edac_dev_feature. > + * @attr_groups: pointer to attribute group's container. > + * > + * Returns number of scrub feature's attribute groups on success, > + * error otherwise. > + */ > +static int edac_dev_feat_init(struct device *parent, > + struct edac_dev_data *dev_data, > + const struct edac_dev_feature *ras_feat, > + const struct attribute_group **attr_groups) > +{ > + int num; > + > + switch (ras_feat->feat) { > + case RAS_FEAT_SCRUB: > + dev_data->scrub_ops = ras_feat->scrub_ops; > + dev_data->private = ras_feat->scrub_ctx; > + return 1; > + case RAS_FEAT_ECS: > + num = ras_feat->ecs_info.num_media_frus; > + dev_data->ecs_ops = ras_feat->ecs_ops; > + dev_data->private = ras_feat->ecs_ctx; > + return num; > + case RAS_FEAT_PPR: > + dev_data->ppr_ops = ras_feat->ppr_ops; > + dev_data->private = ras_feat->ppr_ctx; > + return 1; > + default: > + return -EINVAL; > + } > +} > + > +/** > + * edac_dev_register - register device for ras features with edac s/edac/EDAC/g Check your whole set. > + * @parent: client device. > + * @name: client device's name. > + * @private: parent driver's data to store in the context if any. > + * @num_features: number of ras features to register. > + * @ras_features: list of ras features to register. > + * > + * Returns 0 on success, error otherwise. > + * The new edac_dev_feat_ctx would be freed automatically. > + */ > +int edac_dev_register(struct device *parent, char *name, > + void *private, int num_features, > + const struct edac_dev_feature *ras_features) > +{ > + const struct attribute_group **ras_attr_groups; > + struct edac_dev_data *dev_data; > + struct edac_dev_feat_ctx *ctx; > + int ppr_cnt = 0, ppr_inst = 0; > + int attr_gcnt = 0; > + int ret, feat; > + > + if (!parent || !name || !num_features || !ras_features) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + /* Double parse so we can make space for attributes */ Who's "we"? Please use passive voice in your comments: no "we" or "I", etc. Personal pronouns are ambiguous in text, especially with so many parties/companies/etc developing the kernel so let's avoid them please. > + for (feat = 0; feat < num_features; feat++) { > + switch (ras_features[feat].feat) { > + case RAS_FEAT_SCRUB: Does this need "fallthrough;" or somesuch? > + case RAS_FEAT_PPR: > + attr_gcnt++; > + ppr_cnt++; > + break; > + case RAS_FEAT_ECS: > + attr_gcnt += ras_features[feat].ecs_info.num_media_frus; > + break; > + default: > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + } > + > + ctx = kzalloc(sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!ctx) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + ctx->dev.parent = parent; > + ctx->private = private; > + > + ras_attr_groups = kcalloc(attr_gcnt + 1, sizeof(*ras_attr_groups), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!ras_attr_groups) { > + ret = -ENOMEM; > + goto ctx_free; > + } > + > + if (ppr_cnt) { > + ctx->ppr = kcalloc(ppr_cnt, sizeof(*(ctx->ppr)), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!ctx->ppr) { > + ret = -ENOMEM; > + goto groups_free; > + } > + } > + > + attr_gcnt = 0; > + for (feat = 0; feat < num_features; feat++, ras_features++) { > + switch (ras_features->feat) { > + case RAS_FEAT_SCRUB: > + if (!ras_features->scrub_ops) > + continue; > + dev_data = &ctx->scrub; > + break; > + case RAS_FEAT_ECS: > + if (!ras_features->ecs_ops) > + continue; > + dev_data = &ctx->ecs; > + break; > + case RAS_FEAT_PPR: > + if (!ras_features->ppr_ops) > + continue; > + dev_data = &ctx->ppr[ppr_inst]; > + dev_data->instance = ppr_inst; > + ppr_inst++; > + break; > + default: > + ret = -EINVAL; > + goto data_mem_free; > + } > + ret = edac_dev_feat_init(parent, dev_data, ras_features, > + &ras_attr_groups[attr_gcnt]); > + if (ret < 0) > + goto data_mem_free; > + > + attr_gcnt += ret; > + } Newline. > + ras_attr_groups[attr_gcnt] = NULL; > + ctx->dev.bus = edac_get_sysfs_subsys(); > + ctx->dev.type = &edac_dev_type; > + ctx->dev.groups = ras_attr_groups; > + dev_set_drvdata(&ctx->dev, ctx); Ditto. > + ret = dev_set_name(&ctx->dev, name); > + if (ret) > + goto data_mem_free; > + > + ret = device_register(&ctx->dev); > + if (ret) { > + put_device(&ctx->dev); > + goto data_mem_free; > + return ret; > + } > + > + return devm_add_action_or_reset(parent, edac_dev_unreg, &ctx->dev); > + > +data_mem_free: > + if (ppr_cnt) > + kfree(ctx->ppr); > +groups_free: > + kfree(ras_attr_groups); > +ctx_free: > + kfree(ctx); > + return ret; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(edac_dev_register); > diff --git a/include/linux/edac.h b/include/linux/edac.h > index b4ee8961e623..cc96f55ac714 100644 > --- a/include/linux/edac.h > +++ b/include/linux/edac.h > @@ -661,4 +661,64 @@ static inline struct dimm_info *edac_get_dimm(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, > > return mci->dimms[index]; > } > + > +/* EDAC device features */ > + > +#define EDAC_FEAT_NAME_LEN 128 > + > +enum edac_dev_feat { > + RAS_FEAT_SCRUB, > + RAS_FEAT_ECS, > + RAS_FEAT_PPR, What are those? Comments ontop explaining pls. > + RAS_FEAT_MAX > +}; > + > +struct edac_ecs_ex_info { > + u16 num_media_frus; > +}; > + > +/* > + * EDAC device feature information structure > + */ > +struct edac_dev_data { > + union { > + const struct edac_scrub_ops *scrub_ops; > + const struct edac_ecs_ops *ecs_ops; > + const struct edac_ppr_ops *ppr_ops; > + }; > + u8 instance; > + void *private; > +}; > + > +struct device; > + > +struct edac_dev_feat_ctx { > + struct device dev; > + void *private; > + struct edac_dev_data scrub; > + struct edac_dev_data ecs; > + struct edac_dev_data *ppr; > +}; > + > +struct edac_dev_feature { > + enum edac_dev_feat feat; ft_type; > + u8 instance; > + union { > + const struct edac_scrub_ops *scrub_ops; > + const struct edac_ecs_ops *ecs_ops; > + const struct edac_ppr_ops *ppr_ops; > + }; > + union { > + void *scrub_ctx; > + void *ecs_ctx; > + void *ppr_ctx; > + }; Or drop the silly union and simply do void *ctx; > + union { > + struct edac_ecs_ex_info ecs_info; > + }; Union with a single member?! > +}; > + > +int edac_dev_register(struct device *parent, char *dev_name, > + void *parent_pvt_data, int num_features, > + const struct edac_dev_feature *ras_features); > #endif /* _LINUX_EDAC_H_ */ > -- > 2.34.1 >
Thank you for the feedbacks. Apologies for the delay in replying. >-----Original Message----- >From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> >Sent: 03 September 2024 17:35 >To: Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@huawei.com> >Cc: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org; linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org; linux- >acpi@vger.kernel.org; linux-mm@kvack.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; >tony.luck@intel.com; rafael@kernel.org; lenb@kernel.org; >mchehab@kernel.org; dan.j.williams@intel.com; dave@stgolabs.net; Jonathan >Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>; dave.jiang@intel.com; >alison.schofield@intel.com; vishal.l.verma@intel.com; ira.weiny@intel.com; >david@redhat.com; Vilas.Sridharan@amd.com; leo.duran@amd.com; >Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com; rientjes@google.com; jiaqiyan@google.com; >Jon.Grimm@amd.com; dave.hansen@linux.intel.com; >naoya.horiguchi@nec.com; james.morse@arm.com; jthoughton@google.com; >somasundaram.a@hpe.com; erdemaktas@google.com; pgonda@google.com; >duenwen@google.com; mike.malvestuto@intel.com; gthelen@google.com; >wschwartz@amperecomputing.com; dferguson@amperecomputing.com; >wbs@os.amperecomputing.com; nifan.cxl@gmail.com; jgroves@micron.com; >vsalve@micron.com; tanxiaofei <tanxiaofei@huawei.com>; Zengtao (B) ><prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>; Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>; >kangkang.shen@futurewei.com; wanghuiqiang <wanghuiqiang@huawei.com>; >Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com> >Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 01/14] EDAC: Add support for EDAC device feature's >control > >On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 05:42:24PM +0100, shiju.jose@huawei.com wrote: >> From: Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@huawei.com> >> >> Add generic EDAC device feature's control supports registering > >"features" > >Check your whole set. Sure. Modified. > >> RAS features supported in the system. Driver exposes feature's control >> attributes to the userspace in > >s/the // Changed. > >> /sys/bus/edac/devices/<dev-name>/<ras-feature>/ >> >> Co-developed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> >> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> >> Signed-off-by: Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@huawei.com> >> --- >> drivers/edac/edac_device.c | 178 >+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> include/linux/edac.h | 60 +++++++++++++ >> 2 files changed, 238 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_device.c b/drivers/edac/edac_device.c >> index 621dc2a5d034..635a41db8b5a 100644 >> --- a/drivers/edac/edac_device.c >> +++ b/drivers/edac/edac_device.c >> @@ -570,3 +570,181 @@ void edac_device_handle_ue_count(struct >edac_device_ctl_info *edac_dev, >> block ? block->name : "N/A", count, msg); } >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(edac_device_handle_ue_count); >> + >> +/* EDAC device feature */ >> +static void edac_dev_release(struct device *dev) { >> + struct edac_dev_feat_ctx *ctx = >> + container_of(dev, struct edac_dev_feat_ctx, dev); > >Ew, no, don't do such silly linebreaks pls. Changed. > >> + kfree(ctx->dev.groups); >> + kfree(ctx); >> +} >> + >> +const struct device_type edac_dev_type = { >> + .name = "edac_dev", >> + .release = edac_dev_release, >> +}; >> + >> +static void edac_dev_unreg(void *data) { >> + device_unregister(data); >> +} >> + >> +/** >> + * edac_dev_feature_init - Init a ras feature > >s/ras/RAS/g > >Check your whole set. Sure. Modified. > >> + * @parent: client device. >> + * @dev_data: pointer to struct edac_dev_data. > >I can see it is a pointer. What it is used for? Updated. > >> + * @feat: pointer to struct edac_dev_feature. >> + * @attr_groups: pointer to attribute group's container. >> + * >> + * Returns number of scrub feature's attribute groups on success, >> + * error otherwise. >> + */ >> +static int edac_dev_feat_init(struct device *parent, >> + struct edac_dev_data *dev_data, >> + const struct edac_dev_feature *ras_feat, >> + const struct attribute_group **attr_groups) { >> + int num; >> + >> + switch (ras_feat->feat) { >> + case RAS_FEAT_SCRUB: >> + dev_data->scrub_ops = ras_feat->scrub_ops; >> + dev_data->private = ras_feat->scrub_ctx; >> + return 1; >> + case RAS_FEAT_ECS: >> + num = ras_feat->ecs_info.num_media_frus; >> + dev_data->ecs_ops = ras_feat->ecs_ops; >> + dev_data->private = ras_feat->ecs_ctx; >> + return num; >> + case RAS_FEAT_PPR: >> + dev_data->ppr_ops = ras_feat->ppr_ops; >> + dev_data->private = ras_feat->ppr_ctx; >> + return 1; >> + default: >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> +} >> + >> +/** >> + * edac_dev_register - register device for ras features with edac > >s/edac/EDAC/g > >Check your whole set. Modified. > >> + * @parent: client device. >> + * @name: client device's name. >> + * @private: parent driver's data to store in the context if any. >> + * @num_features: number of ras features to register. >> + * @ras_features: list of ras features to register. >> + * >> + * Returns 0 on success, error otherwise. >> + * The new edac_dev_feat_ctx would be freed automatically. >> + */ >> +int edac_dev_register(struct device *parent, char *name, >> + void *private, int num_features, >> + const struct edac_dev_feature *ras_features) { >> + const struct attribute_group **ras_attr_groups; >> + struct edac_dev_data *dev_data; >> + struct edac_dev_feat_ctx *ctx; >> + int ppr_cnt = 0, ppr_inst = 0; >> + int attr_gcnt = 0; >> + int ret, feat; >> + >> + if (!parent || !name || !num_features || !ras_features) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> + /* Double parse so we can make space for attributes */ > >Who's "we"? > >Please use passive voice in your comments: no "we" or "I", etc. Fixed. > >Personal pronouns are ambiguous in text, especially with so many >parties/companies/etc developing the kernel so let's avoid them please. > >> + for (feat = 0; feat < num_features; feat++) { >> + switch (ras_features[feat].feat) { >> + case RAS_FEAT_SCRUB: > >Does this need "fallthrough;" or somesuch? It is a bug, fixed. > >> + case RAS_FEAT_PPR: >> + attr_gcnt++; >> + ppr_cnt++; >> + break; >> + case RAS_FEAT_ECS: >> + attr_gcnt += >ras_features[feat].ecs_info.num_media_frus; >> + break; >> + default: >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + } >> + >> + ctx = kzalloc(sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!ctx) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + ctx->dev.parent = parent; >> + ctx->private = private; >> + >> + ras_attr_groups = kcalloc(attr_gcnt + 1, sizeof(*ras_attr_groups), >GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!ras_attr_groups) { >> + ret = -ENOMEM; >> + goto ctx_free; >> + } >> + >> + if (ppr_cnt) { >> + ctx->ppr = kcalloc(ppr_cnt, sizeof(*(ctx->ppr)), GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!ctx->ppr) { >> + ret = -ENOMEM; >> + goto groups_free; >> + } >> + } >> + >> + attr_gcnt = 0; >> + for (feat = 0; feat < num_features; feat++, ras_features++) { >> + switch (ras_features->feat) { >> + case RAS_FEAT_SCRUB: >> + if (!ras_features->scrub_ops) >> + continue; >> + dev_data = &ctx->scrub; >> + break; >> + case RAS_FEAT_ECS: >> + if (!ras_features->ecs_ops) >> + continue; >> + dev_data = &ctx->ecs; >> + break; >> + case RAS_FEAT_PPR: >> + if (!ras_features->ppr_ops) >> + continue; >> + dev_data = &ctx->ppr[ppr_inst]; >> + dev_data->instance = ppr_inst; >> + ppr_inst++; >> + break; >> + default: >> + ret = -EINVAL; >> + goto data_mem_free; >> + } >> + ret = edac_dev_feat_init(parent, dev_data, ras_features, >> + &ras_attr_groups[attr_gcnt]); >> + if (ret < 0) >> + goto data_mem_free; >> + >> + attr_gcnt += ret; >> + } > >Newline. Added newline. > >> + ras_attr_groups[attr_gcnt] = NULL; >> + ctx->dev.bus = edac_get_sysfs_subsys(); >> + ctx->dev.type = &edac_dev_type; >> + ctx->dev.groups = ras_attr_groups; >> + dev_set_drvdata(&ctx->dev, ctx); > >Ditto. Added newline. > >> + ret = dev_set_name(&ctx->dev, name); >> + if (ret) >> + goto data_mem_free; >> + >> + ret = device_register(&ctx->dev); >> + if (ret) { >> + put_device(&ctx->dev); >> + goto data_mem_free; >> + return ret; >> + } >> + >> + return devm_add_action_or_reset(parent, edac_dev_unreg, &ctx->dev); >> + >> +data_mem_free: >> + if (ppr_cnt) >> + kfree(ctx->ppr); >> +groups_free: >> + kfree(ras_attr_groups); >> +ctx_free: >> + kfree(ctx); >> + return ret; >> +} >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(edac_dev_register); >> diff --git a/include/linux/edac.h b/include/linux/edac.h index >> b4ee8961e623..cc96f55ac714 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/edac.h >> +++ b/include/linux/edac.h >> @@ -661,4 +661,64 @@ static inline struct dimm_info >> *edac_get_dimm(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, >> >> return mci->dimms[index]; >> } >> + >> +/* EDAC device features */ >> + >> +#define EDAC_FEAT_NAME_LEN 128 >> + >> +enum edac_dev_feat { >> + RAS_FEAT_SCRUB, >> + RAS_FEAT_ECS, >> + RAS_FEAT_PPR, > >What are those? Comments ontop explaining pls. Added comments. > >> + RAS_FEAT_MAX >> +}; >> + >> +struct edac_ecs_ex_info { >> + u16 num_media_frus; >> +}; >> + >> +/* >> + * EDAC device feature information structure */ struct edac_dev_data >> +{ >> + union { >> + const struct edac_scrub_ops *scrub_ops; >> + const struct edac_ecs_ops *ecs_ops; >> + const struct edac_ppr_ops *ppr_ops; >> + }; >> + u8 instance; >> + void *private; >> +}; >> + >> +struct device; >> + >> +struct edac_dev_feat_ctx { >> + struct device dev; >> + void *private; >> + struct edac_dev_data scrub; >> + struct edac_dev_data ecs; >> + struct edac_dev_data *ppr; >> +}; >> + >> +struct edac_dev_feature { >> + enum edac_dev_feat feat; > > ft_type; Sure. Changed. > >> + u8 instance; >> + union { >> + const struct edac_scrub_ops *scrub_ops; >> + const struct edac_ecs_ops *ecs_ops; >> + const struct edac_ppr_ops *ppr_ops; >> + }; >> + union { >> + void *scrub_ctx; >> + void *ecs_ctx; >> + void *ppr_ctx; >> + }; > >Or drop the silly union and simply do > > void *ctx; Modified. > >> + union { >> + struct edac_ecs_ex_info ecs_info; >> + }; > >Union with a single member?! Removed Union. > >> +}; >> + >> +int edac_dev_register(struct device *parent, char *dev_name, >> + void *parent_pvt_data, int num_features, >> + const struct edac_dev_feature *ras_features); >> #endif /* _LINUX_EDAC_H_ */ >> -- >> 2.34.1 >> > >-- >Regards/Gruss, > Boris. > >https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette Thanks, Shiju
diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_device.c b/drivers/edac/edac_device.c index 621dc2a5d034..635a41db8b5a 100644 --- a/drivers/edac/edac_device.c +++ b/drivers/edac/edac_device.c @@ -570,3 +570,181 @@ void edac_device_handle_ue_count(struct edac_device_ctl_info *edac_dev, block ? block->name : "N/A", count, msg); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(edac_device_handle_ue_count); + +/* EDAC device feature */ +static void edac_dev_release(struct device *dev) +{ + struct edac_dev_feat_ctx *ctx = + container_of(dev, struct edac_dev_feat_ctx, dev); + + kfree(ctx->dev.groups); + kfree(ctx); +} + +const struct device_type edac_dev_type = { + .name = "edac_dev", + .release = edac_dev_release, +}; + +static void edac_dev_unreg(void *data) +{ + device_unregister(data); +} + +/** + * edac_dev_feature_init - Init a ras feature + * @parent: client device. + * @dev_data: pointer to struct edac_dev_data. + * @feat: pointer to struct edac_dev_feature. + * @attr_groups: pointer to attribute group's container. + * + * Returns number of scrub feature's attribute groups on success, + * error otherwise. + */ +static int edac_dev_feat_init(struct device *parent, + struct edac_dev_data *dev_data, + const struct edac_dev_feature *ras_feat, + const struct attribute_group **attr_groups) +{ + int num; + + switch (ras_feat->feat) { + case RAS_FEAT_SCRUB: + dev_data->scrub_ops = ras_feat->scrub_ops; + dev_data->private = ras_feat->scrub_ctx; + return 1; + case RAS_FEAT_ECS: + num = ras_feat->ecs_info.num_media_frus; + dev_data->ecs_ops = ras_feat->ecs_ops; + dev_data->private = ras_feat->ecs_ctx; + return num; + case RAS_FEAT_PPR: + dev_data->ppr_ops = ras_feat->ppr_ops; + dev_data->private = ras_feat->ppr_ctx; + return 1; + default: + return -EINVAL; + } +} + +/** + * edac_dev_register - register device for ras features with edac + * @parent: client device. + * @name: client device's name. + * @private: parent driver's data to store in the context if any. + * @num_features: number of ras features to register. + * @ras_features: list of ras features to register. + * + * Returns 0 on success, error otherwise. + * The new edac_dev_feat_ctx would be freed automatically. + */ +int edac_dev_register(struct device *parent, char *name, + void *private, int num_features, + const struct edac_dev_feature *ras_features) +{ + const struct attribute_group **ras_attr_groups; + struct edac_dev_data *dev_data; + struct edac_dev_feat_ctx *ctx; + int ppr_cnt = 0, ppr_inst = 0; + int attr_gcnt = 0; + int ret, feat; + + if (!parent || !name || !num_features || !ras_features) + return -EINVAL; + + /* Double parse so we can make space for attributes */ + for (feat = 0; feat < num_features; feat++) { + switch (ras_features[feat].feat) { + case RAS_FEAT_SCRUB: + case RAS_FEAT_PPR: + attr_gcnt++; + ppr_cnt++; + break; + case RAS_FEAT_ECS: + attr_gcnt += ras_features[feat].ecs_info.num_media_frus; + break; + default: + return -EINVAL; + } + } + + ctx = kzalloc(sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!ctx) + return -ENOMEM; + + ctx->dev.parent = parent; + ctx->private = private; + + ras_attr_groups = kcalloc(attr_gcnt + 1, sizeof(*ras_attr_groups), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!ras_attr_groups) { + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto ctx_free; + } + + if (ppr_cnt) { + ctx->ppr = kcalloc(ppr_cnt, sizeof(*(ctx->ppr)), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!ctx->ppr) { + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto groups_free; + } + } + + attr_gcnt = 0; + for (feat = 0; feat < num_features; feat++, ras_features++) { + switch (ras_features->feat) { + case RAS_FEAT_SCRUB: + if (!ras_features->scrub_ops) + continue; + dev_data = &ctx->scrub; + break; + case RAS_FEAT_ECS: + if (!ras_features->ecs_ops) + continue; + dev_data = &ctx->ecs; + break; + case RAS_FEAT_PPR: + if (!ras_features->ppr_ops) + continue; + dev_data = &ctx->ppr[ppr_inst]; + dev_data->instance = ppr_inst; + ppr_inst++; + break; + default: + ret = -EINVAL; + goto data_mem_free; + } + ret = edac_dev_feat_init(parent, dev_data, ras_features, + &ras_attr_groups[attr_gcnt]); + if (ret < 0) + goto data_mem_free; + + attr_gcnt += ret; + } + ras_attr_groups[attr_gcnt] = NULL; + ctx->dev.bus = edac_get_sysfs_subsys(); + ctx->dev.type = &edac_dev_type; + ctx->dev.groups = ras_attr_groups; + dev_set_drvdata(&ctx->dev, ctx); + ret = dev_set_name(&ctx->dev, name); + if (ret) + goto data_mem_free; + + ret = device_register(&ctx->dev); + if (ret) { + put_device(&ctx->dev); + goto data_mem_free; + return ret; + } + + return devm_add_action_or_reset(parent, edac_dev_unreg, &ctx->dev); + +data_mem_free: + if (ppr_cnt) + kfree(ctx->ppr); +groups_free: + kfree(ras_attr_groups); +ctx_free: + kfree(ctx); + return ret; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(edac_dev_register); diff --git a/include/linux/edac.h b/include/linux/edac.h index b4ee8961e623..cc96f55ac714 100644 --- a/include/linux/edac.h +++ b/include/linux/edac.h @@ -661,4 +661,64 @@ static inline struct dimm_info *edac_get_dimm(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, return mci->dimms[index]; } + +/* EDAC device features */ + +#define EDAC_FEAT_NAME_LEN 128 + +enum edac_dev_feat { + RAS_FEAT_SCRUB, + RAS_FEAT_ECS, + RAS_FEAT_PPR, + RAS_FEAT_MAX +}; + +struct edac_ecs_ex_info { + u16 num_media_frus; +}; + +/* + * EDAC device feature information structure + */ +struct edac_dev_data { + union { + const struct edac_scrub_ops *scrub_ops; + const struct edac_ecs_ops *ecs_ops; + const struct edac_ppr_ops *ppr_ops; + }; + u8 instance; + void *private; +}; + +struct device; + +struct edac_dev_feat_ctx { + struct device dev; + void *private; + struct edac_dev_data scrub; + struct edac_dev_data ecs; + struct edac_dev_data *ppr; +}; + +struct edac_dev_feature { + enum edac_dev_feat feat; + u8 instance; + union { + const struct edac_scrub_ops *scrub_ops; + const struct edac_ecs_ops *ecs_ops; + const struct edac_ppr_ops *ppr_ops; + }; + union { + void *scrub_ctx; + void *ecs_ctx; + void *ppr_ctx; + }; + union { + struct edac_ecs_ex_info ecs_info; + }; +}; + +int edac_dev_register(struct device *parent, char *dev_name, + void *parent_pvt_data, int num_features, + const struct edac_dev_feature *ras_features); #endif /* _LINUX_EDAC_H_ */