diff mbox series

[net-next,v2,9/9] bnxt_en: Support dynamic MSIX

Message ID 20240816212832.185379-10-michael.chan@broadcom.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series bnxt_en: Update for net-next | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for net-next
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 16 this patch: 16
netdev/build_tools success No tools touched, skip
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 4 of 4 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 16 this patch: 16
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 17 this patch: 17
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 81 lines checked
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 2 this patch: 2
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/contest success net-next-2024-08-17--00-00 (tests: 710)

Commit Message

Michael Chan Aug. 16, 2024, 9:28 p.m. UTC
A range of MSIX vectors are allocated at initialization for the number
needed for RocE and L2.  During run-time, if the user increases or
decreases the number of L2 rings, all the MSIX vectors have to be
freed and a new range has to be allocated.  This is not optimal and
causes disruptions to RoCE traffic every time there is a change in L2
MSIX.

If the system supports dynamic MSIX allocations, use dynamic
allocation to add new L2 MSIX vectors or free unneeded L2 MSIX
vectors.  RoCE traffic is not affected using this scheme.

Reviewed-by: Hongguang Gao <hongguang.gao@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Somnath Kotur <somnath.kotur@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
---
v2: Fix typo in changelog
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Przemek Kitszel Aug. 19, 2024, 10:33 a.m. UTC | #1
On 8/16/24 23:28, Michael Chan wrote:
> A range of MSIX vectors are allocated at initialization for the number
> needed for RocE and L2.  During run-time, if the user increases or
> decreases the number of L2 rings, all the MSIX vectors have to be
> freed and a new range has to be allocated.  This is not optimal and
> causes disruptions to RoCE traffic every time there is a change in L2
> MSIX.
> 
> If the system supports dynamic MSIX allocations, use dynamic
> allocation to add new L2 MSIX vectors or free unneeded L2 MSIX
> vectors.  RoCE traffic is not affected using this scheme.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Hongguang Gao <hongguang.gao@broadcom.com>
> Reviewed-by: Somnath Kotur <somnath.kotur@broadcom.com>
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
> ---
> v2: Fix typo in changelog
> ---
>   drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++--
>   1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 

Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
index b969ace6b4d1..d702fc1d9ed5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
@@ -10624,6 +10624,43 @@  static void bnxt_setup_msix(struct bnxt *bp)
 
 static int bnxt_init_int_mode(struct bnxt *bp);
 
+static int bnxt_add_msix(struct bnxt *bp, int total)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	if (bp->total_irqs >= total)
+		return total;
+
+	for (i = bp->total_irqs; i < total; i++) {
+		struct msi_map map;
+
+		map = pci_msix_alloc_irq_at(bp->pdev, i, NULL);
+		if (map.index < 0)
+			break;
+		bp->irq_tbl[i].vector = map.virq;
+		bp->total_irqs++;
+	}
+	return bp->total_irqs;
+}
+
+static int bnxt_trim_msix(struct bnxt *bp, int total)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	if (bp->total_irqs <= total)
+		return total;
+
+	for (i = bp->total_irqs; i > total; i--) {
+		struct msi_map map;
+
+		map.index = i - 1;
+		map.virq = bp->irq_tbl[i - 1].vector;
+		pci_msix_free_irq(bp->pdev, map);
+		bp->total_irqs--;
+	}
+	return bp->total_irqs;
+}
+
 static int bnxt_setup_int_mode(struct bnxt *bp)
 {
 	int rc;
@@ -10790,6 +10827,7 @@  static void bnxt_clear_int_mode(struct bnxt *bp)
 int bnxt_reserve_rings(struct bnxt *bp, bool irq_re_init)
 {
 	bool irq_cleared = false;
+	bool irq_change = false;
 	int tcs = bp->num_tc;
 	int irqs_required;
 	int rc;
@@ -10808,15 +10846,28 @@  int bnxt_reserve_rings(struct bnxt *bp, bool irq_re_init)
 	}
 
 	if (irq_re_init && BNXT_NEW_RM(bp) && irqs_required != bp->total_irqs) {
-		bnxt_ulp_irq_stop(bp);
-		bnxt_clear_int_mode(bp);
-		irq_cleared = true;
+		irq_change = true;
+		if (!pci_msix_can_alloc_dyn(bp->pdev)) {
+			bnxt_ulp_irq_stop(bp);
+			bnxt_clear_int_mode(bp);
+			irq_cleared = true;
+		}
 	}
 	rc = __bnxt_reserve_rings(bp);
 	if (irq_cleared) {
 		if (!rc)
 			rc = bnxt_init_int_mode(bp);
 		bnxt_ulp_irq_restart(bp, rc);
+	} else if (irq_change && !rc) {
+		int total;
+
+		if (irqs_required > bp->total_irqs)
+			total = bnxt_add_msix(bp, irqs_required);
+		else
+			total = bnxt_trim_msix(bp, irqs_required);
+
+		if (total != irqs_required)
+			rc = -ENOSPC;
 	}
 	if (rc) {
 		netdev_err(bp->dev, "ring reservation/IRQ init failure rc: %d\n", rc);