| Message ID | 20240815-preemption-a750-t-v1-7-7bda26c34037@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Preemption support for A7XX | expand |
On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 08:26:17PM +0200, Antonino Maniscalco wrote: > Initialize with 4 rings to enable preemption. > > Signed-off-by: Antonino Maniscalco <antomani103@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c > index 86357016db8d..dfcbe08f2161 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c > @@ -2598,7 +2598,7 @@ struct msm_gpu *a6xx_gpu_init(struct drm_device *dev) > } > > if (is_a7xx) > - ret = adreno_gpu_init(dev, pdev, adreno_gpu, &funcs_a7xx, 1); > + ret = adreno_gpu_init(dev, pdev, adreno_gpu, &funcs_a7xx, 4); Ideally, we should test each a7x target before enabling preemption support. We don't know for sure if the save-restore list is accurate or the firmware used has all the necessary support for preemption. -Akhil. > else if (adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu)) > ret = adreno_gpu_init(dev, pdev, adreno_gpu, &funcs_gmuwrapper, 1); > else > > -- > 2.46.0 > >
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c index 86357016db8d..dfcbe08f2161 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c @@ -2598,7 +2598,7 @@ struct msm_gpu *a6xx_gpu_init(struct drm_device *dev) } if (is_a7xx) - ret = adreno_gpu_init(dev, pdev, adreno_gpu, &funcs_a7xx, 1); + ret = adreno_gpu_init(dev, pdev, adreno_gpu, &funcs_a7xx, 4); else if (adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu)) ret = adreno_gpu_init(dev, pdev, adreno_gpu, &funcs_gmuwrapper, 1); else
Initialize with 4 rings to enable preemption. Signed-off-by: Antonino Maniscalco <antomani103@gmail.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)