| Message ID | 20240819121235.39514-2-jain.abhinav177@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Enhance network interface feature testing | expand |
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 05:42:33PM +0530, Abhinav Jain wrote: > Check if the netdev list is empty and create veth pair to be used for > feature on/off testing. > Remove the veth pair after testing is complete. > > Signed-off-by: Abhinav Jain <jain.abhinav177@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:42:33 +0530 Abhinav Jain wrote: > + echo "veth0" > "$TMP_LIST_NETDEV" > + echo "veth1" >> "$TMP_LIST_NETDEV" Why test both ends? Aren't we going to do the same exact test twice?
On Tue, 20 Aug 2024 16:50:06 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:42:33 +0530 Abhinav Jain wrote: > > + echo "veth0" > "$TMP_LIST_NETDEV" > > + echo "veth1" >> "$TMP_LIST_NETDEV" > > Why test both ends? > Aren't we going to do the same exact test twice? I presumed that we would want to run the interface up/down, setup and ethtool tests on both veth. If this is not required, should I submit a v9 removing veth1 from the temp list? Also, while sending v9, do I add the Review tag from Simon or it has to be reviewed again?
On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 18:07:33 +0530 Abhinav Jain wrote: > I presumed that we would want to run the interface up/down, setup and ethtool tests on both veth. > If this is not required, should I submit a v9 removing veth1 from the temp list? Yes, please. > Also, while sending v9, do I add the Review tag from Simon or it has to be reviewed again? Yes, you should add the review tags
On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 09:00:41 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: >> I presumed that we would want to run the interface up/down, setup and ethtool tests on both veth. >> If this is not required, should I submit a v9 removing veth1 from the temp list? > > Yes, please. > >> Also, while sending v9, do I add the Review tag from Simon or it has to be reviewed again? > > Yes, you should add the review tags Thanks for confirming, I have sent v9 accordingly: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240821171903.118324-1-jain.abhinav177@gmail.com Please review, thanks again.
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/netdevice.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/netdevice.sh index e3afcb424710..0c32950fdd17 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/netdevice.sh +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/netdevice.sh @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ kci_netdev_ethtool() kci_netdev_ethtool_test 74 'dump' "ethtool -d $netdev" kci_netdev_ethtool_test 94 'stats' "ethtool -S $netdev" + return 0 } @@ -196,10 +197,25 @@ if [ ! -e "$TMP_LIST_NETDEV" ];then fi ip link show |grep '^[0-9]' | grep -oE '[[:space:]].*eth[0-9]*:|[[:space:]].*enp[0-9]s[0-9]:' | cut -d\ -f2 | cut -d: -f1> "$TMP_LIST_NETDEV" + +if [ ! -s "$TMP_LIST_NETDEV" ]; then + echo "No valid network device found, creating veth pair" + ip link add veth0 type veth peer name veth1 + echo "veth0" > "$TMP_LIST_NETDEV" + echo "veth1" >> "$TMP_LIST_NETDEV" + veth_created=1 +fi + while read netdev do kci_test_netdev "$netdev" done < "$TMP_LIST_NETDEV" +#clean up veth interface pair if it was created +if [ "$veth_created" ]; then + ip link delete veth0 + echo "Removed veth pair" +fi + rm "$TMP_LIST_NETDEV" exit 0
Check if the netdev list is empty and create veth pair to be used for feature on/off testing. Remove the veth pair after testing is complete. Signed-off-by: Abhinav Jain <jain.abhinav177@gmail.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/net/netdevice.sh | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)