| Message ID | 20240825183103.102904-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | rtc: at91sam9: fix OF node leak in probe() error path | expand |
> Driver is leaking an OF node reference obtained from > of_parse_phandle_with_fixed_args(). Is there a need to improve such a change description another bit? + Imperative mood + Tags like “Fixes” and “Cc” Regards, Markus
On 25/08/2024 21:35, Markus Elfring wrote: >> Driver is leaking an OF node reference obtained from >> of_parse_phandle_with_fixed_args(). > > Is there a need to improve such a change description another bit? > > + Imperative mood I have enough of your stupid emails. Commit msg is fine. > > + Tags like “Fixes” and “Cc” Read the patch. PLONK. Best regards, Krzysztof
>>> Driver is leaking an OF node reference obtained from >>> of_parse_phandle_with_fixed_args(). >> >> Is there a need to improve such a change description another bit? >> >> + Imperative mood … > Commit msg is fine. … >> + Tags like “Fixes” and “Cc” > > Read the patch. What does hinder you to take requirements from a known information source better into account? https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.11-rc5#n94 Regards, Markus
On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 09:12:32AM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote: > >>> Driver is leaking an OF node reference obtained from > >>> of_parse_phandle_with_fixed_args(). > >> > >> Is there a need to improve such a change description another bit? > >> > >> + Imperative mood > … > > Commit msg is fine. > … > >> + Tags like “Fixes” and “Cc” > > > > Read the patch. > > What does hinder you to take requirements from a known information source > better into account? > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.11-rc5#n94 > > Regards, > Markus > Hi, This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing list. I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore. Please do not bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time. Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to follow it at all. The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and inability to adapt to feedback. Please feel free to also ignore emails from them. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot
On Sun, 25 Aug 2024 20:31:03 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Driver is leaking an OF node reference obtained from > of_parse_phandle_with_fixed_args(). > > Applied, thanks! [1/1] rtc: at91sam9: fix OF node leak in probe() error path https://git.kernel.org/abelloni/c/988d7f3571e8 Best regards,
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-at91sam9.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-at91sam9.c index f93bee96e362..993c0878fb66 100644 --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-at91sam9.c +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-at91sam9.c @@ -368,6 +368,7 @@ static int at91_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) return ret; rtc->gpbr = syscon_node_to_regmap(args.np); + of_node_put(args.np); rtc->gpbr_offset = args.args[0]; if (IS_ERR(rtc->gpbr)) { dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to retrieve gpbr regmap, aborting.\n");
Driver is leaking an OF node reference obtained from of_parse_phandle_with_fixed_args(). Fixes: 43e112bb3dea ("rtc: at91sam9: make use of syscon/regmap to access GPBR registers") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> --- drivers/rtc/rtc-at91sam9.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)