diff mbox series

[RFC/RFT,net-next] net: stmmac: drop the ethtool begin() callback

Message ID 20240429-stmmac-no-ethtool-begin-v1-1-04c629c1c142@redhat.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [RFC/RFT,net-next] net: stmmac: drop the ethtool begin() callback | expand

Commit Message

Andrew Halaney April 29, 2024, 9:45 p.m. UTC
This callback doesn't seem to serve much purpose, and prevents things
like:

    - systemd.link files from disabling autonegotiation
    - carrier detection in NetworkManager

prior to userspace bringing the link up.

The only fear I can think of is accessing unclocked resources due to
pm_runtime, but ethtool ioctls handle that as of commit
f32a21376573 ("ethtool: runtime-resume netdev parent before ethtool ioctl ops")

Signed-off-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c | 8 --------
 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)


---
base-commit: a59668a9397e7245b26e9be85d23f242ff757ae8
change-id: 20240424-stmmac-no-ethtool-begin-f306f2f1f2f4

Best regards,

Comments

Dmitry Dolenko Aug. 28, 2024, 2:35 p.m. UTC | #1
Are there any updates on this topic?

We are faced with the fact that we can not read or change settings of
interface while it is down, and came up with the same solution for this
problem.

I do not know if Reviewed-by and Tested-by are suitable for patch marked as
RFC but I will post mine in case it is acceptable here.

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Dolenko <d.dolenko@metrotek.ru>
Tested-by: Dmitry Dolenko <d.dolenko@metrotek.ru>
Andrew Halaney Aug. 29, 2024, 1:14 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 05:35:41PM GMT, Dmitry Dolenko wrote:
> Are there any updates on this topic?
> 
> We are faced with the fact that we can not read or change settings of
> interface while it is down, and came up with the same solution for this
> problem.
> 
> I do not know if Reviewed-by and Tested-by are suitable for patch marked as
> RFC but I will post mine in case it is acceptable here.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Dolenko <d.dolenko@metrotek.ru>
> Tested-by: Dmitry Dolenko <d.dolenko@metrotek.ru>
> 

In my opinion the tags are welcomed.

I had sort of forgotten about this until your reply, the use case I
had was only to try and force out another bug, so it slipped my mind.

Since both of us were bitten by this, and nobody has indicated it's a bad
idea otherwise, I'll rebase and send v2 with your tags to try and get
this merged.

Thanks,
Andrew
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c
index 542e2633a6f5..c2e2723f7c6a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c
@@ -438,13 +438,6 @@  static void stmmac_ethtool_setmsglevel(struct net_device *dev, u32 level)
 
 }
 
-static int stmmac_check_if_running(struct net_device *dev)
-{
-	if (!netif_running(dev))
-		return -EBUSY;
-	return 0;
-}
-
 static int stmmac_ethtool_get_regs_len(struct net_device *dev)
 {
 	struct stmmac_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
@@ -1273,7 +1266,6 @@  static int stmmac_set_tunable(struct net_device *dev,
 static const struct ethtool_ops stmmac_ethtool_ops = {
 	.supported_coalesce_params = ETHTOOL_COALESCE_USECS |
 				     ETHTOOL_COALESCE_MAX_FRAMES,
-	.begin = stmmac_check_if_running,
 	.get_drvinfo = stmmac_ethtool_getdrvinfo,
 	.get_msglevel = stmmac_ethtool_getmsglevel,
 	.set_msglevel = stmmac_ethtool_setmsglevel,