diff mbox series

[v2] bpf: Remove custom build rule

Message ID 20240828170635.4112907-1-legion@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series [v2] bpf: Remove custom build rule | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
netdev/series_format warning Single patches do not need cover letters; Target tree name not specified in the subject
netdev/tree_selection success Guessed tree name to be net-next
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 16 this patch: 16
netdev/build_tools success No tools touched, skip
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 9 maintainers not CCed: sdf@fomichev.me eddyz87@gmail.com haoluo@google.com jolsa@kernel.org song@kernel.org yonghong.song@linux.dev kpsingh@kernel.org martin.lau@linux.dev john.fastabend@gmail.com
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 17 this patch: 17
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 22 this patch: 22
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 3 lines checked
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Alexey Gladkov Aug. 28, 2024, 5:06 p.m. UTC
According to the documentation, when building a kernel with the C=2
parameter, all source files should be checked. But this does not happen
for the kernel/bpf/ directory.

$ touch kernel/bpf/core.o
$ make C=2 CHECK=true kernel/bpf/core.o

Outputs:

  CHECK   scripts/mod/empty.c
  CALL    scripts/checksyscalls.sh
  DESCEND objtool
  INSTALL libsubcmd_headers
  CC      kernel/bpf/core.o

As can be seen the compilation is done, but CHECK is not executed. This
happens because kernel/bpf/Makefile has defined its own rule for
compilation and forgotten the macro that does the check.

There is no need to duplicate the build code, and this rule can be
removed to use generic rules.

Signed-off-by: Alexey Gladkov <legion@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/bpf/Makefile | 6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

Comments

Masahiro Yamada Aug. 28, 2024, 5:22 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 2:07 AM Alexey Gladkov <legion@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> According to the documentation, when building a kernel with the C=2
> parameter, all source files should be checked. But this does not happen
> for the kernel/bpf/ directory.
>
> $ touch kernel/bpf/core.o
> $ make C=2 CHECK=true kernel/bpf/core.o
>
> Outputs:
>
>   CHECK   scripts/mod/empty.c
>   CALL    scripts/checksyscalls.sh
>   DESCEND objtool
>   INSTALL libsubcmd_headers
>   CC      kernel/bpf/core.o
>
> As can be seen the compilation is done, but CHECK is not executed. This
> happens because kernel/bpf/Makefile has defined its own rule for
> compilation and forgotten the macro that does the check.
>
> There is no need to duplicate the build code, and this rule can be
> removed to use generic rules.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Gladkov <legion@kernel.org>


Did you compile-test this?

See my previous email.




I said this:

$ cat kernel/bpf/btf_iter.c
#include "../../tools/lib/bpf/btf_iter.c"


Same for
kernel/bpf/btf_relocate.c
kernel/bpf/relo_core.c











> ---
>  kernel/bpf/Makefile | 6 ------
>  1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/Makefile b/kernel/bpf/Makefile
> index 0291eef9ce92..9b9c151b5c82 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/Makefile
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/Makefile
> @@ -52,9 +52,3 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_PRELOAD) += preload/
>  obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL) += relo_core.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL) += btf_iter.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL) += btf_relocate.o
> -
> -# Some source files are common to libbpf.
> -vpath %.c $(srctree)/kernel/bpf:$(srctree)/tools/lib/bpf
> -
> -$(obj)/%.o: %.c FORCE
> -       $(call if_changed_rule,cc_o_c)
> --
> 2.46.0
>


--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Alexey Gladkov Aug. 28, 2024, 5:49 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 02:22:33AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 2:07 AM Alexey Gladkov <legion@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > According to the documentation, when building a kernel with the C=2
> > parameter, all source files should be checked. But this does not happen
> > for the kernel/bpf/ directory.
> >
> > $ touch kernel/bpf/core.o
> > $ make C=2 CHECK=true kernel/bpf/core.o
> >
> > Outputs:
> >
> >   CHECK   scripts/mod/empty.c
> >   CALL    scripts/checksyscalls.sh
> >   DESCEND objtool
> >   INSTALL libsubcmd_headers
> >   CC      kernel/bpf/core.o
> >
> > As can be seen the compilation is done, but CHECK is not executed. This
> > happens because kernel/bpf/Makefile has defined its own rule for
> > compilation and forgotten the macro that does the check.
> >
> > There is no need to duplicate the build code, and this rule can be
> > removed to use generic rules.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexey Gladkov <legion@kernel.org>
> 
> 
> Did you compile-test this?

Yes. I repeated my steps for reproduce:

$ touch kernel/bpf/core.c
$ make C=2 CHECK=true |grep kernel/bpf/core
  CC      kernel/bpf/core.o
  CHECK   kernel/bpf/core.c

but maybe my config is too small.

> 
> See my previous email.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I said this:
> 
> $ cat kernel/bpf/btf_iter.c
> #include "../../tools/lib/bpf/btf_iter.c"
> 
> 
> Same for
> kernel/bpf/btf_relocate.c
> kernel/bpf/relo_core.c
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > ---
> >  kernel/bpf/Makefile | 6 ------
> >  1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/Makefile b/kernel/bpf/Makefile
> > index 0291eef9ce92..9b9c151b5c82 100644
> > --- a/kernel/bpf/Makefile
> > +++ b/kernel/bpf/Makefile
> > @@ -52,9 +52,3 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_PRELOAD) += preload/
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL) += relo_core.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL) += btf_iter.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL) += btf_relocate.o
> > -
> > -# Some source files are common to libbpf.
> > -vpath %.c $(srctree)/kernel/bpf:$(srctree)/tools/lib/bpf
> > -
> > -$(obj)/%.o: %.c FORCE
> > -       $(call if_changed_rule,cc_o_c)
> > --
> > 2.46.0
> >
> 
> 
> --
> Best Regards
> Masahiro Yamada
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/Makefile b/kernel/bpf/Makefile
index 0291eef9ce92..9b9c151b5c82 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/Makefile
+++ b/kernel/bpf/Makefile
@@ -52,9 +52,3 @@  obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_PRELOAD) += preload/
 obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL) += relo_core.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL) += btf_iter.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL) += btf_relocate.o
-
-# Some source files are common to libbpf.
-vpath %.c $(srctree)/kernel/bpf:$(srctree)/tools/lib/bpf
-
-$(obj)/%.o: %.c FORCE
-	$(call if_changed_rule,cc_o_c)