diff mbox series

[bpf-next] bpftool: Fix handling enum64 in btf dump sorting

Message ID 20240902171721.105253-1-mykyta.yatsenko5@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit b0222d1d9e6f8551a056b89b0bff38f515f3c9b5
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series [bpf-next] bpftool: Fix handling enum64 in btf dump sorting | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/apply success Patch already applied to bpf-next-0

Commit Message

Mykyta Yatsenko Sept. 2, 2024, 5:17 p.m. UTC
From: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>

Wrong function is used to access the first enum64 element.
Substituting btf_enum(t) with btf_enum64(t) for BTF_KIND_ENUM64.

Signed-off-by: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>
---
 tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Quentin Monnet Sept. 2, 2024, 6:52 p.m. UTC | #1
On 2024-09-02 18:17 BST, Mykyta Yatsenko wrote:
> From: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>
> 
> Wrong function is used to access the first enum64 element.
> Substituting btf_enum(t) with btf_enum64(t) for BTF_KIND_ENUM64.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>
> ---
>  tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c | 7 ++++---
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c
> index 6789c7a4d5ca..3b57ba095ab6 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c
> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c
> @@ -561,9 +561,10 @@ static const char *btf_type_sort_name(const struct btf *btf, __u32 index, bool f
>  	case BTF_KIND_ENUM64: {
>  		int name_off = t->name_off;
>  
> -		/* Use name of the first element for anonymous enums if allowed */
> -		if (!from_ref && !t->name_off && btf_vlen(t))
> -			name_off = btf_enum(t)->name_off;
> +		if (!from_ref && !name_off && btf_vlen(t))
> +			name_off = btf_kind(t) == BTF_KIND_ENUM64 ?
> +				btf_enum64(t)->name_off :
> +				btf_enum(t)->name_off;
>  
>  		return btf__name_by_offset(btf, name_off);
>  	}


(Please don't forget to tag your patch as a v2.)
Looks good, thanks!

Acked-by: Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>
patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Sept. 2, 2024, 8:50 p.m. UTC | #2
Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>:

On Mon,  2 Sep 2024 18:17:21 +0100 you wrote:
> From: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>
> 
> Wrong function is used to access the first enum64 element.
> Substituting btf_enum(t) with btf_enum64(t) for BTF_KIND_ENUM64.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next] bpftool: Fix handling enum64 in btf dump sorting
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/b0222d1d9e6f

You are awesome, thank you!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c
index 6789c7a4d5ca..3b57ba095ab6 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c
@@ -561,9 +561,10 @@  static const char *btf_type_sort_name(const struct btf *btf, __u32 index, bool f
 	case BTF_KIND_ENUM64: {
 		int name_off = t->name_off;
 
-		/* Use name of the first element for anonymous enums if allowed */
-		if (!from_ref && !t->name_off && btf_vlen(t))
-			name_off = btf_enum(t)->name_off;
+		if (!from_ref && !name_off && btf_vlen(t))
+			name_off = btf_kind(t) == BTF_KIND_ENUM64 ?
+				btf_enum64(t)->name_off :
+				btf_enum(t)->name_off;
 
 		return btf__name_by_offset(btf, name_off);
 	}