Message ID | 20240903083533.9403-2-hdegoede@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [1/3] platform/x86: panasonic-laptop: Check minimum SQTY value | expand |
On Tue, 3 Sep 2024, Hans de Goede wrote: > Some DSDT-s have an of by one bug where the SINF package count is of -> off > one higher then the SQTY reported value, allocate 1 entry extra. > > Also make the SQTY <-> SINF package count mismatch error more verbose > to help debugging similar issues in the future. > > This fixes the panasonic-laptop driver failing to probe() on some > devices with the following errors: > > [ 3.958887] SQTY reports bad SINF length SQTY: 37 SINF-pkg-count: 38 > [ 3.958892] Couldn't retrieve BIOS data > [ 3.983685] Panasonic Laptop Support - With Macros: probe of MAT0019:00 failed with error -5 > > Fixes: 709ee531c153 ("panasonic-laptop: add Panasonic Let's Note laptop extras driver v0.94") > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Tested-by: James Harmison <jharmison@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> > --- > drivers/platform/x86/panasonic-laptop.c | 9 ++++++++- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/panasonic-laptop.c b/drivers/platform/x86/panasonic-laptop.c > index d7f9017a5a13..4c9e20e1afe8 100644 > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/panasonic-laptop.c > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/panasonic-laptop.c > @@ -337,7 +337,8 @@ static int acpi_pcc_retrieve_biosdata(struct pcc_acpi *pcc) > } > > if (pcc->num_sifr < hkey->package.count) { > - pr_err("SQTY reports bad SINF length\n"); > + pr_err("SQTY reports bad SINF length SQTY: %ld SINF-pkg-count: %d\n", > + pcc->num_sifr, hkey->package.count); Both are unsigned so dont use d but u formatting. > status = AE_ERROR; > goto end; > } > @@ -968,6 +969,12 @@ static int acpi_pcc_hotkey_add(struct acpi_device *device) > return -ENODEV; > } > > + /* > + * Some DSDT-s have an of by one bug where the SINF package count is off > + * one higher then the SQTY reported value, allocate 1 entry extra. > + */ > + num_sifr++; > + > pcc = kzalloc(sizeof(struct pcc_acpi), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!pcc) { > pr_err("Couldn't allocate mem for pcc"); >
On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 1:33 PM Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On Tue, 3 Sep 2024, Hans de Goede wrote: > > Some DSDT-s have an of by one bug where the SINF package count is > > of -> off I even dare to ask for an "off-by-one" form (similar (grammatically!) to step-by-step). > > one higher then the SQTY reported value, allocate 1 entry extra. than > > + /* > > + * Some DSDT-s have an of by one bug where the SINF package count is > > off Ditto. > > + * one higher then the SQTY reported value, allocate 1 entry extra. than > > + */
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/panasonic-laptop.c b/drivers/platform/x86/panasonic-laptop.c index d7f9017a5a13..4c9e20e1afe8 100644 --- a/drivers/platform/x86/panasonic-laptop.c +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/panasonic-laptop.c @@ -337,7 +337,8 @@ static int acpi_pcc_retrieve_biosdata(struct pcc_acpi *pcc) } if (pcc->num_sifr < hkey->package.count) { - pr_err("SQTY reports bad SINF length\n"); + pr_err("SQTY reports bad SINF length SQTY: %ld SINF-pkg-count: %d\n", + pcc->num_sifr, hkey->package.count); status = AE_ERROR; goto end; } @@ -968,6 +969,12 @@ static int acpi_pcc_hotkey_add(struct acpi_device *device) return -ENODEV; } + /* + * Some DSDT-s have an of by one bug where the SINF package count is + * one higher then the SQTY reported value, allocate 1 entry extra. + */ + num_sifr++; + pcc = kzalloc(sizeof(struct pcc_acpi), GFP_KERNEL); if (!pcc) { pr_err("Couldn't allocate mem for pcc");