| Message ID | 20240820104239.1774600-1-quic_mdalam@quicinc.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | Add QPIC SPI NAND driver | expand |
Hi Miquel, On 8/20/2024 4:12 PM, Md Sadre Alam wrote: > v8: > * Fixed compilation warning reported by kernel test robot > * Added "chip" description in nandc_set_read_loc_first() > * Added "chip" description" in nandc_set_read_loc_last() > * Changed data type of read_location0, read_location1, > read_location2, read_location3, addr0, addr1, cmd, cfg0, > cfg1, ecc_bch_cfg, ecc_buf_cfg, clrflashstatus, clrreadstatus, > orig_cmd1, orig_vld to __le32 to fix compilation warning. > * Included bitfield.h header file in spi-qpic-snand.c to > fix compilation warning > * Removed unused variable "steps" variable from > qcom_spi_ecc_init_ctx_pipelined() > I have addressed your comments to v6 and further posted till v8. Could you please let me know if this is fine. and how to get this merged ? Regards, Alam.
Hi, quic_mdalam@quicinc.com wrote on Tue, 3 Sep 2024 14:45:15 +0530: > Hi Miquel, > > On 8/20/2024 4:12 PM, Md Sadre Alam wrote: > > v8: > > * Fixed compilation warning reported by kernel test robot > > * Added "chip" description in nandc_set_read_loc_first() > > * Added "chip" description" in nandc_set_read_loc_last() > > * Changed data type of read_location0, read_location1, > > read_location2, read_location3, addr0, addr1, cmd, cfg0, > > cfg1, ecc_bch_cfg, ecc_buf_cfg, clrflashstatus, clrreadstatus, > > orig_cmd1, orig_vld to __le32 to fix compilation warning. > > * Included bitfield.h header file in spi-qpic-snand.c to > > fix compilation warning > > * Removed unused variable "steps" variable from > > qcom_spi_ecc_init_ctx_pipelined() > > > I have addressed your comments to v6 and further posted till v8. > Could you please let me know if this is fine. > and how to get this merged ? There are still kernel test robot reports, so this means there are issues in your code that I don't need to point out explicitly, but I am actively waiting for them to be fixed. Thanks, Miquèl
On 03/09/2024 11:15, Md Sadre Alam wrote: > Hi Miquel, > > On 8/20/2024 4:12 PM, Md Sadre Alam wrote: >> v8: >> * Fixed compilation warning reported by kernel test robot >> * Added "chip" description in nandc_set_read_loc_first() >> * Added "chip" description" in nandc_set_read_loc_last() >> * Changed data type of read_location0, read_location1, >> read_location2, read_location3, addr0, addr1, cmd, cfg0, >> cfg1, ecc_bch_cfg, ecc_buf_cfg, clrflashstatus, clrreadstatus, >> orig_cmd1, orig_vld to __le32 to fix compilation warning. >> * Included bitfield.h header file in spi-qpic-snand.c to >> fix compilation warning >> * Removed unused variable "steps" variable from >> qcom_spi_ecc_init_ctx_pipelined() >> > I have addressed your comments to v6 and further posted till v8. > Could you please let me know if this is fine. > and how to get this merged ? Two weeks ago you received reports that your code does not build properly. So no, it is not fine. Please respond to the reports and/or send corrected code. Best regards, Krzysztof
On 9/3/2024 6:38 PM, Miquel Raynal wrote: > Hi, > > quic_mdalam@quicinc.com wrote on Tue, 3 Sep 2024 14:45:15 +0530: > >> Hi Miquel, >> >> On 8/20/2024 4:12 PM, Md Sadre Alam wrote: >>> v8: >>> * Fixed compilation warning reported by kernel test robot >>> * Added "chip" description in nandc_set_read_loc_first() >>> * Added "chip" description" in nandc_set_read_loc_last() >>> * Changed data type of read_location0, read_location1, >>> read_location2, read_location3, addr0, addr1, cmd, cfg0, >>> cfg1, ecc_bch_cfg, ecc_buf_cfg, clrflashstatus, clrreadstatus, >>> orig_cmd1, orig_vld to __le32 to fix compilation warning. >>> * Included bitfield.h header file in spi-qpic-snand.c to >>> fix compilation warning >>> * Removed unused variable "steps" variable from >>> qcom_spi_ecc_init_ctx_pipelined() >>> >> I have addressed your comments to v6 and further posted till v8. >> Could you please let me know if this is fine. >> and how to get this merged ? > > There are still kernel test robot reports, so this means there are > issues in your code that I don't need to point out explicitly, but I am > actively waiting for them to be fixed. Sorry I missed it, will fix and post next revision. > > Thanks, > Miquèl
On 9/3/2024 7:14 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 03/09/2024 11:15, Md Sadre Alam wrote: >> Hi Miquel, >> >> On 8/20/2024 4:12 PM, Md Sadre Alam wrote: >>> v8: >>> * Fixed compilation warning reported by kernel test robot >>> * Added "chip" description in nandc_set_read_loc_first() >>> * Added "chip" description" in nandc_set_read_loc_last() >>> * Changed data type of read_location0, read_location1, >>> read_location2, read_location3, addr0, addr1, cmd, cfg0, >>> cfg1, ecc_bch_cfg, ecc_buf_cfg, clrflashstatus, clrreadstatus, >>> orig_cmd1, orig_vld to __le32 to fix compilation warning. >>> * Included bitfield.h header file in spi-qpic-snand.c to >>> fix compilation warning >>> * Removed unused variable "steps" variable from >>> qcom_spi_ecc_init_ctx_pipelined() >>> >> I have addressed your comments to v6 and further posted till v8. >> Could you please let me know if this is fine. >> and how to get this merged ? > > Two weeks ago you received reports that your code does not build > properly. So no, it is not fine. Please respond to the reports and/or > send corrected code. Sorry I missed it, will fix and post next revision. > > Best regards, > Krzysztof >
On 9/3/2024 6:38 PM, Miquel Raynal wrote: > Hi, > > quic_mdalam@quicinc.com wrote on Tue, 3 Sep 2024 14:45:15 +0530: > >> Hi Miquel, >> >> On 8/20/2024 4:12 PM, Md Sadre Alam wrote: >>> v8: >>> * Fixed compilation warning reported by kernel test robot >>> * Added "chip" description in nandc_set_read_loc_first() >>> * Added "chip" description" in nandc_set_read_loc_last() >>> * Changed data type of read_location0, read_location1, >>> read_location2, read_location3, addr0, addr1, cmd, cfg0, >>> cfg1, ecc_bch_cfg, ecc_buf_cfg, clrflashstatus, clrreadstatus, >>> orig_cmd1, orig_vld to __le32 to fix compilation warning. >>> * Included bitfield.h header file in spi-qpic-snand.c to >>> fix compilation warning >>> * Removed unused variable "steps" variable from >>> qcom_spi_ecc_init_ctx_pipelined() >>> >> I have addressed your comments to v6 and further posted till v8. >> Could you please let me know if this is fine. >> and how to get this merged ? > > There are still kernel test robot reports, so this means there are > issues in your code that I don't need to point out explicitly, but I am > actively waiting for them to be fixed. I have fixed most of the sparse warnings after converting __le32 to u32. However am not able to address the following sparse warnings drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c:1401:29: sparse: warning: cast to restricted __le32 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c:1587:30: sparse: warning: cast to restricted __le32 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c:1588:31: sparse: warning: cast to restricted __le32 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c:1589:34: sparse: warning: cast to restricted __le32 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c:2479:47: sparse: got restricted __le32 [usertype] drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c:2480:47: sparse: got restricted __le32 [usertype] drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c:2616:25: sparse: warning: cast to restricted __le32 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c:2672:32: sparse: warning: cast to restricted __le32 These warnings are seen with existing kernel code too. For example drivers/mtd/ftl.c:299:39: sparse: warning: cast to restricted __le32 drivers/mtd/ftl.c:387:23: sparse: got restricted __le32 [usertype] Hence, can these be ignored as false positives and post the next version of the patches. Kindly advice. Thanks Alam
Hi, > >>> >> I have addressed your comments to v6 and further posted till v8. > >> Could you please let me know if this is fine. > >> and how to get this merged ? > > > > There are still kernel test robot reports, so this means there are > > issues in your code that I don't need to point out explicitly, but I am > > actively waiting for them to be fixed. > > I have fixed most of the sparse warnings after converting __le32 to u32. > However am not able to address the following sparse warnings > > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c:1401:29: sparse: warning: cast to restricted __le32 > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c:1587:30: sparse: warning: cast to restricted __le32 > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c:1588:31: sparse: warning: cast to restricted __le32 > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c:1589:34: sparse: warning: cast to restricted __le32 > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c:2479:47: sparse: got restricted __le32 [usertype] > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c:2480:47: sparse: got restricted __le32 [usertype] > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c:2616:25: sparse: warning: cast to restricted __le32 > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c:2672:32: sparse: warning: cast to restricted __le32 The rule is: you cannot add new warnings. For existing warnings in the driver, I'd anyway advise to solve them. Without the actual code I cannot help. Thanks, Miquèl
On 9/10/2024 1:11 PM, Miquel Raynal wrote: > Hi, > >>>>> >> I have addressed your comments to v6 and further posted till v8. >>>> Could you please let me know if this is fine. >>>> and how to get this merged ? >>> >>> There are still kernel test robot reports, so this means there are >>> issues in your code that I don't need to point out explicitly, but I am >>> actively waiting for them to be fixed. >> >> I have fixed most of the sparse warnings after converting __le32 to u32. >> However am not able to address the following sparse warnings >> >> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c:1401:29: sparse: warning: cast to restricted __le32 >> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c:1587:30: sparse: warning: cast to restricted __le32 >> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c:1588:31: sparse: warning: cast to restricted __le32 >> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c:1589:34: sparse: warning: cast to restricted __le32 >> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c:2479:47: sparse: got restricted __le32 [usertype] >> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c:2480:47: sparse: got restricted __le32 [usertype] >> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c:2616:25: sparse: warning: cast to restricted __le32 >> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c:2672:32: sparse: warning: cast to restricted __le32 > > The rule is: you cannot add new warnings. > > For existing warnings in the driver, I'd anyway advise to solve them. > Without the actual code I cannot help. I have fixed all the warnings and posted next revision. > > Thanks, > Miquèl
v8: * Fixed compilation warning reported by kernel test robot * Added "chip" description in nandc_set_read_loc_first() * Added "chip" description" in nandc_set_read_loc_last() * Changed data type of read_location0, read_location1, read_location2, read_location3, addr0, addr1, cmd, cfg0, cfg1, ecc_bch_cfg, ecc_buf_cfg, clrflashstatus, clrreadstatus, orig_cmd1, orig_vld to __le32 to fix compilation warning. * Included bitfield.h header file in spi-qpic-snand.c to fix compilation warning * Removed unused variable "steps" variable from qcom_spi_ecc_init_ctx_pipelined() v7: * Added read_oob() and write_oob() api * Added FIELD_PREP() in spi init * Made CONFIG_SPI_QPIC_SNAND and CONFIG_MTD_NAND_QCOM as bool type * Removed offset 0 in oob_ecc() layout * Handled multiple error condition v6: * Added FIELD_PREP() and GENMASK() macro * Added qpic_spi_nand{..} structure for spi nand realted variables * Made qpic_common.c slectable based on either CONFIG_MTD_NAND_QCOM or CONFIG_SPI_QPIC_SNAND * Removed rawnand.h from qpic-common.h * Removed partitions.h and rawnand.h form spi-qpic-snand.c * Added qcom_nand_unalloc() in remove() v5: * Fixes nandbiterr issue * Added raw_read() and raw_write() API * Added qcom_ prefix to all the common API * Removed register indirection * Following tests for SPI-NAND devices passed - mtd_oobtest - mtd_pagetest - mtd_readtest - mtd_speedtest - mtd_stresstest - mtd_subpagetest - mtd_nandbiterrs - nandtest - nanddump - nandwrite - nandbiterr -i - mtd erase - mtd write - dd - hexddump v4: * In this patch series fixes kernel doc for all the cmmon api * Also fixes dm-binding commit message * Fix qpic_common.c compilation based on config v3: * In this patch series fixes multiple things like added clock-name, added _alloc_controller api instead of alloc_master, made common apis more generic etc. * Addressed all the comment from v2 patch series v2: * https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20240215134856.1313239-1-quic_mdalam@quicinc.com/ * In this series of patchs we have added basic working QPIC SPI NAND driver with READ, WRITE, ERASE etc functionality * Addressed all the comments given in RFC [v1] patch v1: * https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20231031120307.1600689-1-quic_mdalam@quicinc.com/ * Initial set of patches for handling QPIC SPI NAND. Md Sadre Alam (8): spi: dt-bindings: Introduce qcom,spi-qpic-snand mtd: rawnand: qcom: cleanup qcom_nandc driver mtd: rawnand: qcom: Add qcom prefix to common api mtd: nand: Add qpic_common API file mtd: rawnand: qcom: use FIELD_PREP and GENMASK spi: spi-qpic: add driver for QCOM SPI NAND flash Interface arm64: dts: qcom: ipq9574: Add SPI nand support arm64: dts: qcom: ipq9574: Disable eMMC node .../bindings/spi/qcom,spi-qpic-snand.yaml | 83 + .../boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574-rdp-common.dtsi | 43 + arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574-rdp433.dts | 2 +- arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi | 27 + drivers/mtd/nand/Makefile | 7 + drivers/mtd/nand/qpic_common.c | 738 +++++++ drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Kconfig | 2 +- drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 1730 +++-------------- drivers/spi/Kconfig | 8 + drivers/spi/Makefile | 1 + drivers/spi/spi-qpic-snand.c | 1637 ++++++++++++++++ include/linux/mtd/nand-qpic-common.h | 482 +++++ 12 files changed, 3331 insertions(+), 1429 deletions(-) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/qcom,spi-qpic-snand.yaml create mode 100644 drivers/mtd/nand/qpic_common.c create mode 100644 drivers/spi/spi-qpic-snand.c create mode 100644 include/linux/mtd/nand-qpic-common.h