Message ID | 20240901184213.2303047-1-stefan@datenfreihafen.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 7f85b11203dd1dd0d534f2a9568e02e9d45cb400 |
Headers | show |
Series | pull-request: ieee802154 for net 2024-09-01 | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
netdev/tree_selection | success | Pull request for net |
netdev/build_32bit | success | Errors and warnings before: 16 this patch: 16 |
netdev/build_tools | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
netdev/build_clang | success | Errors and warnings before: 16 this patch: 16 |
netdev/verify_signedoff | success | Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer |
netdev/verify_fixes | success | No Fixes tag |
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn | success | Errors and warnings before: 19 this patch: 19 |
netdev/build_clang_rust | success | No Rust files in patch. Skipping build |
netdev/kdoc | success | Errors and warnings before: 20 this patch: 20 |
netdev/contest | success | net-next-2024-09-02--00-00 (tests: 714) |
On Sun, 1 Sep 2024 20:42:13 +0200 Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Simon Horman catched two typos in our headers. No functional change.
Is it okay if we merge these into net-next ?
On one hand they are unlikely^w guaranteed not to introduce
regressions, but on the other such trivial spelling fixes are
not at all urgent.
Hello. On 9/3/24 8:42 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Sun, 1 Sep 2024 20:42:13 +0200 Stefan Schmidt wrote: >> Simon Horman catched two typos in our headers. No functional change. > > Is it okay if we merge these into net-next ? > On one hand they are unlikely^w guaranteed not to introduce > regressions, but on the other such trivial spelling fixes are > not at all urgent. Sure, no problem. They just landed in my fixes queue and thus wpan. They can easily go through net-next. Can you merge the pull directly or do need a new one against net-next? regards Stefan Schmidt
On Tue, 3 Sep 2024 20:52:03 +0200 Stefan Schmidt wrote: > On 9/3/24 8:42 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Sun, 1 Sep 2024 20:42:13 +0200 Stefan Schmidt wrote: > >> Simon Horman catched two typos in our headers. No functional change. > > > > Is it okay if we merge these into net-next ? > > On one hand they are unlikely^w guaranteed not to introduce > > regressions, but on the other such trivial spelling fixes are > > not at all urgent. > > Sure, no problem. They just landed in my fixes queue and thus wpan. They > can easily go through net-next. Can you merge the pull directly or do > need a new one against net-next? I'll pull this one, thanks!
Hello: This pull request was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main) by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>: On Sun, 1 Sep 2024 20:42:13 +0200 you wrote: > Hello Dave, Jakub, Paolo. > > An update from ieee802154 for your *net* tree: > > Simon Horman catched two typos in our headers. No functional change. > > regards > Stefan Schmidt > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - pull-request: ieee802154 for net 2024-09-01 https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/7f85b11203dd You are awesome, thank you!