| Message ID | 20240903145615.9302-2-detlev.casanova@collabora.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | dt-bindings: mmc: Add support for rk3576 eMMC | expand |
On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 10:51:36AM -0400, Detlev Casanova wrote: > The device is compatible with rk3588, so add an entry for the 2 > compatibles together. > > The rk3576 device has a power-domain that needs to be on for the eMMC to > be used. Add it as a requirement. > > Signed-off-by: Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@collabora.com> > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> NAK Drop fake tag. It is impossible to receive a review-tag from me on THE FIRST version. I almost never provide reviews out of mailing lists. And since there is no changelog here and no versioning, this obviously is not v2 or v3. > --- > .../bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml | 34 ++++++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml > index 80d50178d2e3..84a667f0c526 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml > @@ -12,14 +12,18 @@ maintainers: > > properties: > compatible: > - enum: > - - rockchip,rk3568-dwcmshc > - - rockchip,rk3588-dwcmshc > - - snps,dwcmshc-sdhci > - - sophgo,cv1800b-dwcmshc > - - sophgo,sg2002-dwcmshc > - - sophgo,sg2042-dwcmshc > - - thead,th1520-dwcmshc > + oneOf: > + - items: > + - const: rockchip,rk3576-dwcmshc > + - const: rockchip,rk3588-dwcmshc > + - enum: > + - rockchip,rk3568-dwcmshc > + - rockchip,rk3588-dwcmshc > + - snps,dwcmshc-sdhci > + - sophgo,cv1800b-dwcmshc > + - sophgo,sg2002-dwcmshc > + - sophgo,sg2042-dwcmshc > + - thead,th1520-dwcmshc > > reg: > maxItems: 1 > @@ -35,6 +39,9 @@ properties: > minItems: 1 > maxItems: 5 > > + power-domains: > + maxItems: 1 > + > resets: > maxItems: 5 > > @@ -97,6 +104,17 @@ allOf: > - const: block > - const: timer > > + - if: > + properties: > + compatible: > + contains: > + const: rockchip,rk3576-dwcmshc > + > + then: > + properties: > + power-domains: > + minItems: 1 Why minItems? This does not look right. I don't get what you are trying to say here. Best regards, Krzysztof
On Wednesday, 4 September 2024 02:00:27 EDT Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 10:51:36AM -0400, Detlev Casanova wrote: > > The device is compatible with rk3588, so add an entry for the 2 > > compatibles together. > > > > The rk3576 device has a power-domain that needs to be on for the eMMC to > > be used. Add it as a requirement. > > > > Signed-off-by: Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@collabora.com> > > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> > > NAK > > Drop fake tag. It is impossible to receive a review-tag from me on THE > FIRST version. I almost never provide reviews out of mailing lists. > > And since there is no changelog here and no versioning, this obviously > is not v2 or v3. That's because the patch was from another patchset[0]. Only this patch needed a rebase on the mmc tree, so I sent it separately. You reviewed it here [1]. [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/010201919989e3de-60b56341-85e0-4869-89d1-362407c4f2ec-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com/ [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/m5ua5jnbv4u36glqt2qrps35asuqfycxedgjrfhodi5bvs2r2h@xvy4qxt4gx74/ > > --- > > > > .../bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml | 34 ++++++++++++++----- > > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml index > > 80d50178d2e3..84a667f0c526 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml > > > > @@ -12,14 +12,18 @@ maintainers: > > properties: > > compatible: > > - enum: > > - - rockchip,rk3568-dwcmshc > > - - rockchip,rk3588-dwcmshc > > - - snps,dwcmshc-sdhci > > - - sophgo,cv1800b-dwcmshc > > - - sophgo,sg2002-dwcmshc > > - - sophgo,sg2042-dwcmshc > > - - thead,th1520-dwcmshc > > + oneOf: > > + - items: > > + - const: rockchip,rk3576-dwcmshc > > + - const: rockchip,rk3588-dwcmshc > > + - enum: > > + - rockchip,rk3568-dwcmshc > > + - rockchip,rk3588-dwcmshc > > + - snps,dwcmshc-sdhci > > + - sophgo,cv1800b-dwcmshc > > + - sophgo,sg2002-dwcmshc > > + - sophgo,sg2042-dwcmshc > > + - thead,th1520-dwcmshc > > > > reg: > > maxItems: 1 > > > > @@ -35,6 +39,9 @@ properties: > > minItems: 1 > > maxItems: 5 > > > > + power-domains: > > + maxItems: 1 > > + > > > > resets: > > maxItems: 5 > > > > @@ -97,6 +104,17 @@ allOf: > > - const: block > > - const: timer > > > > + - if: > > + properties: > > + compatible: > > + contains: > > + const: rockchip,rk3576-dwcmshc > > + > > + then: > > + properties: > > + power-domains: > > + minItems: 1 > > Why minItems? This does not look right. I don't get what you are trying > to say here. I'm saying that for the rockchip,rk3576-dwcmshc compatible, 1 power-domain node has to be set. Regards, Detlev.
On 04/09/2024 14:56, Detlev Casanova wrote: > On Wednesday, 4 September 2024 02:00:27 EDT Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 10:51:36AM -0400, Detlev Casanova wrote: >>> The device is compatible with rk3588, so add an entry for the 2 >>> compatibles together. >>> >>> The rk3576 device has a power-domain that needs to be on for the eMMC to >>> be used. Add it as a requirement. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@collabora.com> >>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> >> >> NAK >> >> Drop fake tag. It is impossible to receive a review-tag from me on THE >> FIRST version. I almost never provide reviews out of mailing lists. >> >> And since there is no changelog here and no versioning, this obviously >> is not v2 or v3. > > That's because the patch was from another patchset[0]. Only this patch needed > a rebase on the mmc tree, so I sent it separately. You reviewed it here [1]. > > [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/010201919989e3de-60b56341-85e0-4869-89d1-362407c4f2ec-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com/ > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/m5ua5jnbv4u36glqt2qrps35asuqfycxedgjrfhodi5bvs2r2h@xvy4qxt4gx74/ Hm, ok, changelog should explained this and the versioning should continue, including history of this patch. > >>> --- >>> >>> .../bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml | 34 ++++++++++++++----- >>> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml >>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml index >>> 80d50178d2e3..84a667f0c526 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml >>> >>> @@ -12,14 +12,18 @@ maintainers: >>> properties: >>> compatible: >>> - enum: >>> - - rockchip,rk3568-dwcmshc >>> - - rockchip,rk3588-dwcmshc >>> - - snps,dwcmshc-sdhci >>> - - sophgo,cv1800b-dwcmshc >>> - - sophgo,sg2002-dwcmshc >>> - - sophgo,sg2042-dwcmshc >>> - - thead,th1520-dwcmshc >>> + oneOf: >>> + - items: >>> + - const: rockchip,rk3576-dwcmshc >>> + - const: rockchip,rk3588-dwcmshc >>> + - enum: >>> + - rockchip,rk3568-dwcmshc >>> + - rockchip,rk3588-dwcmshc >>> + - snps,dwcmshc-sdhci >>> + - sophgo,cv1800b-dwcmshc >>> + - sophgo,sg2002-dwcmshc >>> + - sophgo,sg2042-dwcmshc >>> + - thead,th1520-dwcmshc >>> >>> reg: >>> maxItems: 1 >>> >>> @@ -35,6 +39,9 @@ properties: >>> minItems: 1 >>> maxItems: 5 >>> >>> + power-domains: >>> + maxItems: 1 >>> + >>> >>> resets: >>> maxItems: 5 >>> >>> @@ -97,6 +104,17 @@ allOf: >>> - const: block >>> - const: timer >>> >>> + - if: >>> + properties: >>> + compatible: >>> + contains: >>> + const: rockchip,rk3576-dwcmshc >>> + >>> + then: >>> + properties: >>> + power-domains: >>> + minItems: 1 >> >> Why minItems? This does not look right. I don't get what you are trying >> to say here. > > I'm saying that for the rockchip,rk3576-dwcmshc compatible, 1 power-domain > node has to be set. The top-level property already says this. You need to disallow it for other variants (:false). Best regards, Krzysztof
On Wednesday, 4 September 2024 09:02:40 EDT Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 04/09/2024 14:56, Detlev Casanova wrote: > > On Wednesday, 4 September 2024 02:00:27 EDT Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 10:51:36AM -0400, Detlev Casanova wrote: > >>> The device is compatible with rk3588, so add an entry for the 2 > >>> compatibles together. > >>> > >>> The rk3576 device has a power-domain that needs to be on for the eMMC to > >>> be used. Add it as a requirement. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@collabora.com> > >>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> > >> > >> NAK > >> > >> Drop fake tag. It is impossible to receive a review-tag from me on THE > >> FIRST version. I almost never provide reviews out of mailing lists. > >> > >> And since there is no changelog here and no versioning, this obviously > >> is not v2 or v3. > > > > That's because the patch was from another patchset[0]. Only this patch > > needed a rebase on the mmc tree, so I sent it separately. You reviewed it > > here [1]. > > > > [0]: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/010201919989e3de-60b56341-85e0-4869-89d1-3624 > > 07c4f2ec-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com/ [1]: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/m5ua5jnbv4u36glqt2qrps35asuqfycxedgjrfhodi5bv > > s2r2h@xvy4qxt4gx74/ > Hm, ok, changelog should explained this and the versioning should > continue, including history of this patch. Sorry about that, I'll send a v4 after this one with the corresponding changelog then. > >>> --- > >>> > >>> .../bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml | 34 ++++++++++++++----- > >>> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git > >>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml > >>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml index > >>> 80d50178d2e3..84a667f0c526 100644 > >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml > >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml > >>> > >>> @@ -12,14 +12,18 @@ maintainers: > >>> properties: > >>> compatible: > >>> - enum: > >>> - - rockchip,rk3568-dwcmshc > >>> - - rockchip,rk3588-dwcmshc > >>> - - snps,dwcmshc-sdhci > >>> - - sophgo,cv1800b-dwcmshc > >>> - - sophgo,sg2002-dwcmshc > >>> - - sophgo,sg2042-dwcmshc > >>> - - thead,th1520-dwcmshc > >>> + oneOf: > >>> + - items: > >>> + - const: rockchip,rk3576-dwcmshc > >>> + - const: rockchip,rk3588-dwcmshc > >>> + - enum: > >>> + - rockchip,rk3568-dwcmshc > >>> + - rockchip,rk3588-dwcmshc > >>> + - snps,dwcmshc-sdhci > >>> + - sophgo,cv1800b-dwcmshc > >>> + - sophgo,sg2002-dwcmshc > >>> + - sophgo,sg2042-dwcmshc > >>> + - thead,th1520-dwcmshc > >>> > >>> reg: > >>> maxItems: 1 > >>> > >>> @@ -35,6 +39,9 @@ properties: > >>> minItems: 1 > >>> maxItems: 5 > >>> > >>> + power-domains: > >>> + maxItems: 1 > >>> + > >>> > >>> resets: > >>> maxItems: 5 > >>> > >>> @@ -97,6 +104,17 @@ allOf: > >>> - const: block > >>> - const: timer > >>> > >>> + - if: > >>> + properties: > >>> + compatible: > >>> + contains: > >>> + const: rockchip,rk3576-dwcmshc > >>> + > >>> + then: > >>> + properties: > >>> + power-domains: > >>> + minItems: 1 > >> > >> Why minItems? This does not look right. I don't get what you are trying > >> to say here. > > > > I'm saying that for the rockchip,rk3576-dwcmshc compatible, 1 power-domain > > node has to be set. > > The top-level property already says this. You need to disallow it for > other variants (:false). Ok, something like this: allOf: - if: properties: compatible: contains: const: rockchip,rk3576-dwcmshc then: required: - power-domains else: properties: power-domains: false Detlev.
On 04/09/2024 16:20, Detlev Casanova wrote: >>>>> + properties: >>>>> + power-domains: >>>>> + minItems: 1 >>>> >>>> Why minItems? This does not look right. I don't get what you are trying >>>> to say here. >>> >>> I'm saying that for the rockchip,rk3576-dwcmshc compatible, 1 power-domain >>> node has to be set. >> >> The top-level property already says this. You need to disallow it for >> other variants (:false). > > Ok, something like this: > > allOf: > - if: > properties: > compatible: > contains: > const: rockchip,rk3576-dwcmshc > > then: > required: > - power-domains > > else: > properties: > power-domains: false Yes, if they are required. Otherwise use "if: not:" and just disallow them. Best regards, Krzysztof
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml index 80d50178d2e3..84a667f0c526 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml @@ -12,14 +12,18 @@ maintainers: properties: compatible: - enum: - - rockchip,rk3568-dwcmshc - - rockchip,rk3588-dwcmshc - - snps,dwcmshc-sdhci - - sophgo,cv1800b-dwcmshc - - sophgo,sg2002-dwcmshc - - sophgo,sg2042-dwcmshc - - thead,th1520-dwcmshc + oneOf: + - items: + - const: rockchip,rk3576-dwcmshc + - const: rockchip,rk3588-dwcmshc + - enum: + - rockchip,rk3568-dwcmshc + - rockchip,rk3588-dwcmshc + - snps,dwcmshc-sdhci + - sophgo,cv1800b-dwcmshc + - sophgo,sg2002-dwcmshc + - sophgo,sg2042-dwcmshc + - thead,th1520-dwcmshc reg: maxItems: 1 @@ -35,6 +39,9 @@ properties: minItems: 1 maxItems: 5 + power-domains: + maxItems: 1 + resets: maxItems: 5 @@ -97,6 +104,17 @@ allOf: - const: block - const: timer + - if: + properties: + compatible: + contains: + const: rockchip,rk3576-dwcmshc + + then: + properties: + power-domains: + minItems: 1 + unevaluatedProperties: false examples: