diff mbox series

[6.10.y,2/6] selftests: mptcp: join: test for flush/re-add endpoints

Message ID 20240902172516.3021978-10-matttbe@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
State Mainlined, archived
Delegated to: Matthieu Baerts
Headers show
Series Backport of "selftests: mptcp: join: test for flush/re-add endpoints" and more | expand

Commit Message

Matthieu Baerts Sept. 2, 2024, 5:25 p.m. UTC
commit e06959e9eebdfea4654390f53b65cff57691872e upstream.

After having flushed endpoints that didn't cause the creation of new
subflows, it is important to check endpoints can be re-created, re-using
previously used IDs.

Before the previous commit, the client would not have been able to
re-create the subflow that was previously rejected.

The 'Fixes' tag here below is the same as the one from the previous
commit: this patch here is not fixing anything wrong in the selftests,
but it validates the previous fix for an issue introduced by this commit
ID.

Fixes: 06faa2271034 ("mptcp: remove multi addresses and subflows in PM")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <martineau@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240819-net-mptcp-pm-reusing-id-v1-6-38035d40de5b@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
---
 .../testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh | 30 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)

Comments

Matthieu Baerts Sept. 4, 2024, 12:40 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Greg, Sasha,

On 02/09/2024 19:25, Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) wrote:
> commit e06959e9eebdfea4654390f53b65cff57691872e upstream.
> 
> After having flushed endpoints that didn't cause the creation of new
> subflows, it is important to check endpoints can be re-created, re-using
> previously used IDs.
> 
> Before the previous commit, the client would not have been able to
> re-create the subflow that was previously rejected.
> 
> The 'Fixes' tag here below is the same as the one from the previous
> commit: this patch here is not fixing anything wrong in the selftests,
> but it validates the previous fix for an issue introduced by this commit
> ID.

FYI, Sasha has applied all the patches from this series, except this
one, the backport of e06959e9eebd ("selftests: mptcp: join: test for
flush/re-add endpoints").

In theory, this commit can be applied without any conflicts now that
commit b5e2fb832f48 ("selftests: mptcp: add explicit test case for
remove/readd") has been queued in v6.10.

Cheers,
Matt
Greg KH Sept. 4, 2024, 2:16 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 02:40:52PM +0200, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
> Hi Greg, Sasha,
> 
> On 02/09/2024 19:25, Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) wrote:
> > commit e06959e9eebdfea4654390f53b65cff57691872e upstream.
> > 
> > After having flushed endpoints that didn't cause the creation of new
> > subflows, it is important to check endpoints can be re-created, re-using
> > previously used IDs.
> > 
> > Before the previous commit, the client would not have been able to
> > re-create the subflow that was previously rejected.
> > 
> > The 'Fixes' tag here below is the same as the one from the previous
> > commit: this patch here is not fixing anything wrong in the selftests,
> > but it validates the previous fix for an issue introduced by this commit
> > ID.
> 
> FYI, Sasha has applied all the patches from this series, except this
> one, the backport of e06959e9eebd ("selftests: mptcp: join: test for
> flush/re-add endpoints").
> 
> In theory, this commit can be applied without any conflicts now that
> commit b5e2fb832f48 ("selftests: mptcp: add explicit test case for
> remove/readd") has been queued in v6.10.

Thanks, I've done that right now.

greg k-h
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh
index fb2d8326109e..7dee194bdb62 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh
@@ -3655,6 +3655,36 @@  endpoint_tests()
 		mptcp_lib_kill_wait $tests_pid
 	fi
 
+	# flush and re-add
+	if reset_with_tcp_filter "flush re-add" ns2 10.0.3.2 REJECT OUTPUT &&
+	   mptcp_lib_kallsyms_has "subflow_rebuild_header$"; then
+		pm_nl_set_limits $ns1 0 2
+		pm_nl_set_limits $ns2 1 2
+		# broadcast IP: no packet for this address will be received on ns1
+		pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns1 224.0.0.1 id 2 flags signal
+		pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns2 10.0.3.2 id 3 flags subflow
+		test_linkfail=4 speed=20 \
+			run_tests $ns1 $ns2 10.0.1.1 &
+		local tests_pid=$!
+
+		wait_attempt_fail $ns2
+		chk_subflow_nr "before flush" 1
+		chk_mptcp_info subflows 0 subflows 0
+
+		pm_nl_flush_endpoint $ns2
+		pm_nl_flush_endpoint $ns1
+		wait_rm_addr $ns2 0
+		ip netns exec "${ns2}" ${iptables} -D OUTPUT -s "10.0.3.2" -p tcp -j REJECT
+		pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns2 10.0.3.2 id 3 flags subflow
+		wait_mpj $ns2
+		pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns1 10.0.3.1 id 2 flags signal
+		wait_mpj $ns2
+		mptcp_lib_kill_wait $tests_pid
+
+		chk_join_nr 2 2 2
+		chk_add_nr 2 2
+		chk_rm_nr 1 0 invert
+	fi
 }
 
 # [$1: error message]