Message ID | 20240905012237.79683-1-kuniyu@amazon.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Awaiting Upstream |
Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
Headers | show |
Series | [v1,can] can: bcm: Clear bo->bcm_proc_read after remove_proc_entry(). | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
netdev/tree_selection | success | Series ignored based on subject |
Hi Iwashima san, Thank you for your patch. On Thu. 5 Sep. 2024 at 10:24, Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com> wrote: > syzbot reported a warning in bcm_release(). [0] > > The blamed change fixed another warning that is triggered when > connect() is issued again for a socket whose connect()ed device has > been unregistered. > > However, if the socket is just close()d without the 2nd connect(), the > remaining bo->bcm_proc_read triggers unnecessary remove_proc_entry() > in bcm_release(). > > Let's clear bo->bcm_proc_read after remove_proc_entry() in bcm_notify(). > > [0] > name '4986' > WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5234 at fs/proc/generic.c:711 remove_proc_entry+0x2e7/0x5d0 fs/proc/generic.c:711 > Modules linked in: > CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5234 Comm: syz-executor606 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc5-syzkaller-00178-g5517ae241919 #0 > Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/06/2024 > RIP: 0010:remove_proc_entry+0x2e7/0x5d0 fs/proc/generic.c:711 > Code: ff eb 05 e8 cb 1e 5e ff 48 8b 5c 24 10 48 c7 c7 e0 f7 aa 8e e8 2a 38 8e 09 90 48 c7 c7 60 3a 1b 8c 48 89 de e8 da 42 20 ff 90 <0f> 0b 90 90 48 8b 44 24 18 48 c7 44 24 40 0e 36 e0 45 49 c7 04 07 > RSP: 0018:ffffc9000345fa20 EFLAGS: 00010246 > RAX: 2a2d0aee2eb64600 RBX: ffff888032f1f548 RCX: ffff888029431e00 > RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 > RBP: ffffc9000345fb08 R08: ffffffff8155b2f2 R09: 1ffff1101710519a > R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffed101710519b R12: ffff888011d38640 > R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: dffffc0000000000 > FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880b8800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 > CR2: 00007fcfb52722f0 CR3: 000000000e734000 CR4: 00000000003506f0 > DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 > DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 > Call Trace: > <TASK> > bcm_release+0x250/0x880 net/can/bcm.c:1578 > __sock_release net/socket.c:659 [inline] > sock_close+0xbc/0x240 net/socket.c:1421 > __fput+0x24a/0x8a0 fs/file_table.c:422 > task_work_run+0x24f/0x310 kernel/task_work.c:228 > exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:40 [inline] > do_exit+0xa2f/0x27f0 kernel/exit.c:882 > do_group_exit+0x207/0x2c0 kernel/exit.c:1031 > __do_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1042 [inline] > __se_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1040 [inline] > __x64_sys_exit_group+0x3f/0x40 kernel/exit.c:1040 > x64_sys_call+0x2634/0x2640 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:232 > do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] > do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f > RIP: 0033:0x7fcfb51ee969 > Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0x7fcfb51ee93f. > RSP: 002b:00007ffce0109ca8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000e7 > RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 00007fcfb51ee969 > RDX: 000000000000003c RSI: 00000000000000e7 RDI: 0000000000000001 > RBP: 00007fcfb526f3b0 R08: ffffffffffffffb8 R09: 0000555500000000 > R10: 0000555500000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fcfb526f3b0 > R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007fcfb5271ee0 R15: 00007fcfb51bf160 > </TASK> > > Fixes: 76fe372ccb81 ("can: bcm: Remove proc entry when dev is unregistered.") > Reported-by: syzbot+0532ac7a06fb1a03187e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=0532ac7a06fb1a03187e > Tested-by: syzbot+0532ac7a06fb1a03187e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com> Reviewed-by: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
On 04.09.2024 18:22:37, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote: > syzbot reported a warning in bcm_release(). [0] > > The blamed change fixed another warning that is triggered when > connect() is issued again for a socket whose connect()ed device has > been unregistered. > > However, if the socket is just close()d without the 2nd connect(), the > remaining bo->bcm_proc_read triggers unnecessary remove_proc_entry() > in bcm_release(). > > Let's clear bo->bcm_proc_read after remove_proc_entry() in bcm_notify(). > > [0] > name '4986' > WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5234 at fs/proc/generic.c:711 remove_proc_entry+0x2e7/0x5d0 fs/proc/generic.c:711 > Modules linked in: > CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5234 Comm: syz-executor606 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc5-syzkaller-00178-g5517ae241919 #0 > Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/06/2024 > RIP: 0010:remove_proc_entry+0x2e7/0x5d0 fs/proc/generic.c:711 > Code: ff eb 05 e8 cb 1e 5e ff 48 8b 5c 24 10 48 c7 c7 e0 f7 aa 8e e8 2a 38 8e 09 90 48 c7 c7 60 3a 1b 8c 48 89 de e8 da 42 20 ff 90 <0f> 0b 90 90 48 8b 44 24 18 48 c7 44 24 40 0e 36 e0 45 49 c7 04 07 > RSP: 0018:ffffc9000345fa20 EFLAGS: 00010246 > RAX: 2a2d0aee2eb64600 RBX: ffff888032f1f548 RCX: ffff888029431e00 > RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 > RBP: ffffc9000345fb08 R08: ffffffff8155b2f2 R09: 1ffff1101710519a > R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffed101710519b R12: ffff888011d38640 > R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: dffffc0000000000 > FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880b8800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 > CR2: 00007fcfb52722f0 CR3: 000000000e734000 CR4: 00000000003506f0 > DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 > DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 > Call Trace: > <TASK> > bcm_release+0x250/0x880 net/can/bcm.c:1578 > __sock_release net/socket.c:659 [inline] > sock_close+0xbc/0x240 net/socket.c:1421 > __fput+0x24a/0x8a0 fs/file_table.c:422 > task_work_run+0x24f/0x310 kernel/task_work.c:228 > exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:40 [inline] > do_exit+0xa2f/0x27f0 kernel/exit.c:882 > do_group_exit+0x207/0x2c0 kernel/exit.c:1031 > __do_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1042 [inline] > __se_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1040 [inline] > __x64_sys_exit_group+0x3f/0x40 kernel/exit.c:1040 > x64_sys_call+0x2634/0x2640 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:232 > do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] > do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f > RIP: 0033:0x7fcfb51ee969 > Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0x7fcfb51ee93f. > RSP: 002b:00007ffce0109ca8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000e7 > RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 00007fcfb51ee969 > RDX: 000000000000003c RSI: 00000000000000e7 RDI: 0000000000000001 > RBP: 00007fcfb526f3b0 R08: ffffffffffffffb8 R09: 0000555500000000 > R10: 0000555500000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fcfb526f3b0 > R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007fcfb5271ee0 R15: 00007fcfb51bf160 > </TASK> > > Fixes: 76fe372ccb81 ("can: bcm: Remove proc entry when dev is unregistered.") > Reported-by: syzbot+0532ac7a06fb1a03187e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=0532ac7a06fb1a03187e > Tested-by: syzbot+0532ac7a06fb1a03187e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com> Applied to linux-can. Thanks, Marc
diff --git a/net/can/bcm.c b/net/can/bcm.c index 46d3ec3aa44b..217049fa496e 100644 --- a/net/can/bcm.c +++ b/net/can/bcm.c @@ -1471,8 +1471,10 @@ static void bcm_notify(struct bcm_sock *bo, unsigned long msg, /* remove device reference, if this is our bound device */ if (bo->bound && bo->ifindex == dev->ifindex) { #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROC_FS) - if (sock_net(sk)->can.bcmproc_dir && bo->bcm_proc_read) + if (sock_net(sk)->can.bcmproc_dir && bo->bcm_proc_read) { remove_proc_entry(bo->procname, sock_net(sk)->can.bcmproc_dir); + bo->bcm_proc_read = NULL; + } #endif bo->bound = 0; bo->ifindex = 0;