Message ID | 20240902030034.67152-3-xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | None | expand |
On Mon Sep 2, 2024 at 6:00 AM EEST, Shuai Xue wrote: > Part of return value comments for memory_failure() were originally > documented at the call site. Move those comments to the function > declaration to improve code readability and to provide developers with > immediate access to function usage and return information. > > Signed-off-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com> > --- > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c | 7 ------- > mm/memory-failure.c | 9 ++++++--- > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c > index b85ec7a4ec9e..66693b6dd1cd 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c > @@ -1361,13 +1361,6 @@ static void kill_me_maybe(struct callback_head *cb) > return; > } > > - /* > - * -EHWPOISON from memory_failure() means that it already sent SIGBUS > - * to the current process with the proper error info, > - * -EOPNOTSUPP means hwpoison_filter() filtered the error event, > - * > - * In both cases, no further processing is required. > - */ > if (ret == -EHWPOISON || ret == -EOPNOTSUPP) > return; > > diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c > index 7066fc84f351..df26e2ff5e06 100644 > --- a/mm/memory-failure.c > +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c > @@ -2199,9 +2199,12 @@ static void kill_procs_now(struct page *p, unsigned long pfn, int flags, > * Must run in process context (e.g. a work queue) with interrupts > * enabled and no spinlocks held. > * > - * Return: 0 for successfully handled the memory error, > - * -EOPNOTSUPP for hwpoison_filter() filtered the error event, > - * < 0(except -EOPNOTSUPP) on failure. > + * Return values: s/Return values/Return:/ https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt > + * 0 - success, > + * -EOPNOTSUPP - hwpoison_filter() filtered the error event, > + * -EHWPOISON - the page was already poisoned, potentially > + * kill process, > + * other negative values - failure. > */ > int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags) > { BR, Jarkko
在 2024/9/4 00:10, Jarkko Sakkinen 写道: > On Mon Sep 2, 2024 at 6:00 AM EEST, Shuai Xue wrote: >> Part of return value comments for memory_failure() were originally >> documented at the call site. Move those comments to the function >> declaration to improve code readability and to provide developers with >> immediate access to function usage and return information. >> >> Signed-off-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com> >> --- >> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c | 7 ------- >> mm/memory-failure.c | 9 ++++++--- >> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c >> index b85ec7a4ec9e..66693b6dd1cd 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c >> @@ -1361,13 +1361,6 @@ static void kill_me_maybe(struct callback_head *cb) >> return; >> } >> >> - /* >> - * -EHWPOISON from memory_failure() means that it already sent SIGBUS >> - * to the current process with the proper error info, >> - * -EOPNOTSUPP means hwpoison_filter() filtered the error event, >> - * >> - * In both cases, no further processing is required. >> - */ >> if (ret == -EHWPOISON || ret == -EOPNOTSUPP) >> return; >> >> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c >> index 7066fc84f351..df26e2ff5e06 100644 >> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c >> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c >> @@ -2199,9 +2199,12 @@ static void kill_procs_now(struct page *p, unsigned long pfn, int flags, >> * Must run in process context (e.g. a work queue) with interrupts >> * enabled and no spinlocks held. >> * >> - * Return: 0 for successfully handled the memory error, >> - * -EOPNOTSUPP for hwpoison_filter() filtered the error event, >> - * < 0(except -EOPNOTSUPP) on failure. >> + * Return values: > > s/Return values/Return:/ > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt > Hi, Jarkko, Thank you for the reminder. Will fix it in next version. Best Regards, Shuai
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c index b85ec7a4ec9e..66693b6dd1cd 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c @@ -1361,13 +1361,6 @@ static void kill_me_maybe(struct callback_head *cb) return; } - /* - * -EHWPOISON from memory_failure() means that it already sent SIGBUS - * to the current process with the proper error info, - * -EOPNOTSUPP means hwpoison_filter() filtered the error event, - * - * In both cases, no further processing is required. - */ if (ret == -EHWPOISON || ret == -EOPNOTSUPP) return; diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c index 7066fc84f351..df26e2ff5e06 100644 --- a/mm/memory-failure.c +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c @@ -2199,9 +2199,12 @@ static void kill_procs_now(struct page *p, unsigned long pfn, int flags, * Must run in process context (e.g. a work queue) with interrupts * enabled and no spinlocks held. * - * Return: 0 for successfully handled the memory error, - * -EOPNOTSUPP for hwpoison_filter() filtered the error event, - * < 0(except -EOPNOTSUPP) on failure. + * Return values: + * 0 - success, + * -EOPNOTSUPP - hwpoison_filter() filtered the error event, + * -EHWPOISON - the page was already poisoned, potentially + * kill process, + * other negative values - failure. */ int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags) {
Part of return value comments for memory_failure() were originally documented at the call site. Move those comments to the function declaration to improve code readability and to provide developers with immediate access to function usage and return information. Signed-off-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com> --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c | 7 ------- mm/memory-failure.c | 9 ++++++--- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)