Message ID | 20240910154535.140587-3-felix.moessbauer@siemens.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | io_uring/io-wq: respect cgroup cpusets | expand |
On 9/10/24 9:45 AM, Felix Moessbauer wrote: > The io worker threads are userland threads that just never exit to the > userland. By that, they are also assigned to a cgroup (the group of the > creating task). > > When creating a new io worker, this worker should inherit the cpuset > of the cgroup. This still has that same ambient usage in the title which I just cannot make sense of?
diff --git a/io_uring/io-wq.c b/io_uring/io-wq.c index c7055a8895d7..a38f36b68060 100644 --- a/io_uring/io-wq.c +++ b/io_uring/io-wq.c @@ -1168,7 +1168,7 @@ struct io_wq *io_wq_create(unsigned bounded, struct io_wq_data *data) if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&wq->cpu_mask, GFP_KERNEL)) goto err; - cpumask_copy(wq->cpu_mask, cpu_possible_mask); + cpuset_cpus_allowed(data->task, wq->cpu_mask); wq->acct[IO_WQ_ACCT_BOUND].max_workers = bounded; wq->acct[IO_WQ_ACCT_UNBOUND].max_workers = task_rlimit(current, RLIMIT_NPROC);
The io worker threads are userland threads that just never exit to the userland. By that, they are also assigned to a cgroup (the group of the creating task). When creating a new io worker, this worker should inherit the cpuset of the cgroup. Fixes: da64d6db3bd3 ("io_uring: One wqe per wq") Signed-off-by: Felix Moessbauer <felix.moessbauer@siemens.com> --- io_uring/io-wq.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)