Message ID | 20240913084022.3343903-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | net: phy: Support master-slave config via device tree | expand |
On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 10:40:20 +0200 Oleksij Rempel wrote: > This patch series adds support for configuring the master/slave role of > PHYs via the device tree. A new `master-slave` property is introduced in > the device tree bindings, allowing PHYs to be forced into either master > or slave mode. This is particularly necessary for Single Pair Ethernet > (SPE) PHYs (1000/100/10Base-T1), where hardware strap pins may not be > available or correctly configured, but it is applicable to all PHY > types. I was hoping we'd see some acks here in time, but now Linus cut the 6.11 final so the 6.12 game is over now: pw-bot: defer
On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 06:06:30PM +0200, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 10:40:20 +0200 Oleksij Rempel wrote: > > This patch series adds support for configuring the master/slave role of > > PHYs via the device tree. A new `master-slave` property is introduced in > > the device tree bindings, allowing PHYs to be forced into either master > > or slave mode. This is particularly necessary for Single Pair Ethernet > > (SPE) PHYs (1000/100/10Base-T1), where hardware strap pins may not be > > available or correctly configured, but it is applicable to all PHY > > types. > > I was hoping we'd see some acks here in time, but now Linus cut the 6.11 > final so the 6.12 game is over now: The device tree binding is not decided on yet. So deferred is correct. Andrew
On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 08:41:42PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 06:06:30PM +0200, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 10:40:20 +0200 Oleksij Rempel wrote: > > > This patch series adds support for configuring the master/slave role of > > > PHYs via the device tree. A new `master-slave` property is introduced in > > > the device tree bindings, allowing PHYs to be forced into either master > > > or slave mode. This is particularly necessary for Single Pair Ethernet > > > (SPE) PHYs (1000/100/10Base-T1), where hardware strap pins may not be > > > available or correctly configured, but it is applicable to all PHY > > > types. > > > > I was hoping we'd see some acks here in time, but now Linus cut the 6.11 > > final so the 6.12 game is over now: > > The device tree binding is not decided on yet. So deferred is correct. No problem. See you on LPC, my flight starting right now. Regards, Oleksij