| Message ID | 20240920043027.21907-4-xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | None | expand |
On Fri Sep 20, 2024 at 7:30 AM EEST, Shuai Xue wrote: > The memory uncorrected error could be signaled by asynchronous interrupt > (specifically, SPI in arm64 platform), e.g. when an error is detected by > a background scrubber, or signaled by synchronous exception > (specifically, data abort excepction in arm64 platform), e.g. when a CPU > tries to access a poisoned cache line. Currently, both synchronous and > asynchronous error use memory_failure_queue() to schedule > memory_failure() exectute in kworker context. > > As a result, when a user-space process is accessing a poisoned data, a > data abort is taken and the memory_failure() is executed in the kworker > context: > > - will send wrong si_code by SIGBUS signal in early_kill mode, and > - can not kill the user-space in some cases resulting a synchronous > error infinite loop > > Issue 1: send wrong si_code in early_kill mode > > Since commit a70297d22132 ("ACPI: APEI: set memory failure flags as > MF_ACTION_REQUIRED on synchronous events")', the flag MF_ACTION_REQUIRED > could be used to determine whether a synchronous exception occurs on > ARM64 platform. When a synchronous exception is detected, the kernel is > expected to terminate the current process which has accessed poisoned > page. This is done by sending a SIGBUS signal with an error code > BUS_MCEERR_AR, indicating an action-required machine check error on > read. > > However, when kill_proc() is called to terminate the processes who have > the poisoned page mapped, it sends the incorrect SIGBUS error code > BUS_MCEERR_AO because the context in which it operates is not the one > where the error was triggered. > > To reproduce this problem: > > #sysctl -w vm.memory_failure_early_kill=1 > vm.memory_failure_early_kill = 1 > > # STEP2: inject an UCE error and consume it to trigger a synchronous error > #einj_mem_uc single > 0: single vaddr = 0xffffb0d75400 paddr = 4092d55b400 > injecting ... > triggering ... > signal 7 code 5 addr 0xffffb0d75000 > page not present > Test passed > > The si_code (code 5) from einj_mem_uc indicates that it is BUS_MCEERR_AO > error and it is not fact. > > After this patch: > > # STEP1: enable early kill mode > #sysctl -w vm.memory_failure_early_kill=1 > vm.memory_failure_early_kill = 1 > # STEP2: inject an UCE error and consume it to trigger a synchronous error > #einj_mem_uc single > 0: single vaddr = 0xffffb0d75400 paddr = 4092d55b400 > injecting ... > triggering ... > signal 7 code 4 addr 0xffffb0d75000 > page not present > Test passed > > The si_code (code 4) from einj_mem_uc indicates that it is BUS_MCEERR_AR > error as we expected. > > Issue 2: a synchronous error infinite loop > > If a user-space process, e.g. devmem, a poisoned page which has been set > HWPosion flag, kill_accessing_process() is called to send SIGBUS to the > current processs with error info. Because the memory_failure() is > executed in the kworker contex, it will just do nothing but return > EFAULT. So, devmem will access the posioned page and trigger an > excepction again, resulting in a synchronous error infinite loop. Such > loop may cause platform firmware to exceed some threshold and reboot > when Linux could have recovered from this error. > > To reproduce this problem: > > # STEP 1: inject an UCE error, and kernel will set HWPosion flag for related page > #einj_mem_uc single > 0: single vaddr = 0xffffb0d75400 paddr = 4092d55b400 > injecting ... > triggering ... > signal 7 code 4 addr 0xffffb0d75000 > page not present > Test passed > > # STEP 2: access the same page and it will trigger a synchronous error infinite loop > devmem 0x4092d55b400 > > To fix above two issues, queue memory_failure() as a task_work so that it runs in > the context of the process that is actually consuming the poisoned data. > > Signed-off-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com> > Tested-by: Ma Wupeng <mawupeng1@huawei.com> > Reviewed-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> > Reviewed-by: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com> > Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> > --- > drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- > include/acpi/ghes.h | 3 -- > include/linux/mm.h | 1 - > mm/memory-failure.c | 13 ------- > 4 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c > index 93eb11482832..60d8044f14d1 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c > @@ -467,28 +467,42 @@ static void ghes_clear_estatus(struct ghes *ghes, > } > > /* > - * Called as task_work before returning to user-space. > - * Ensure any queued work has been done before we return to the context that > - * triggered the notification. > + * struct task_work - for synchronous RAS event > + * > + * @twork: callback_head for task work > + * @pfn: page frame number of corrupted page > + * @flags: work control flags > + * > + * Structure to pass task work to be handled before > + * returning to user-space via task_work_add(). > */ > -static void ghes_kick_task_work(struct callback_head *head) > +struct task_work { > + struct callback_head twork; > + u64 pfn; > + int flags; > +}; I'd rename this as ghes_task_work. It is too generic name IMHO, easily confused with task_work.h definitions. BR, Jarkko
在 2024/9/20 19:44, Jarkko Sakkinen 写道: > On Fri Sep 20, 2024 at 7:30 AM EEST, Shuai Xue wrote: >> The memory uncorrected error could be signaled by asynchronous interrupt >> (specifically, SPI in arm64 platform), e.g. when an error is detected by >> a background scrubber, or signaled by synchronous exception >> (specifically, data abort excepction in arm64 platform), e.g. when a CPU >> tries to access a poisoned cache line. Currently, both synchronous and >> asynchronous error use memory_failure_queue() to schedule >> memory_failure() exectute in kworker context. >> >> As a result, when a user-space process is accessing a poisoned data, a >> data abort is taken and the memory_failure() is executed in the kworker >> context: >> >> - will send wrong si_code by SIGBUS signal in early_kill mode, and >> - can not kill the user-space in some cases resulting a synchronous >> error infinite loop >> >> Issue 1: send wrong si_code in early_kill mode >> >> Since commit a70297d22132 ("ACPI: APEI: set memory failure flags as >> MF_ACTION_REQUIRED on synchronous events")', the flag MF_ACTION_REQUIRED >> could be used to determine whether a synchronous exception occurs on >> ARM64 platform. When a synchronous exception is detected, the kernel is >> expected to terminate the current process which has accessed poisoned >> page. This is done by sending a SIGBUS signal with an error code >> BUS_MCEERR_AR, indicating an action-required machine check error on >> read. >> >> However, when kill_proc() is called to terminate the processes who have >> the poisoned page mapped, it sends the incorrect SIGBUS error code >> BUS_MCEERR_AO because the context in which it operates is not the one >> where the error was triggered. >> >> To reproduce this problem: >> >> #sysctl -w vm.memory_failure_early_kill=1 >> vm.memory_failure_early_kill = 1 >> >> # STEP2: inject an UCE error and consume it to trigger a synchronous error >> #einj_mem_uc single >> 0: single vaddr = 0xffffb0d75400 paddr = 4092d55b400 >> injecting ... >> triggering ... >> signal 7 code 5 addr 0xffffb0d75000 >> page not present >> Test passed >> >> The si_code (code 5) from einj_mem_uc indicates that it is BUS_MCEERR_AO >> error and it is not fact. >> >> After this patch: >> >> # STEP1: enable early kill mode >> #sysctl -w vm.memory_failure_early_kill=1 >> vm.memory_failure_early_kill = 1 >> # STEP2: inject an UCE error and consume it to trigger a synchronous error >> #einj_mem_uc single >> 0: single vaddr = 0xffffb0d75400 paddr = 4092d55b400 >> injecting ... >> triggering ... >> signal 7 code 4 addr 0xffffb0d75000 >> page not present >> Test passed >> >> The si_code (code 4) from einj_mem_uc indicates that it is BUS_MCEERR_AR >> error as we expected. >> >> Issue 2: a synchronous error infinite loop >> >> If a user-space process, e.g. devmem, a poisoned page which has been set >> HWPosion flag, kill_accessing_process() is called to send SIGBUS to the >> current processs with error info. Because the memory_failure() is >> executed in the kworker contex, it will just do nothing but return >> EFAULT. So, devmem will access the posioned page and trigger an >> excepction again, resulting in a synchronous error infinite loop. Such >> loop may cause platform firmware to exceed some threshold and reboot >> when Linux could have recovered from this error. >> >> To reproduce this problem: >> >> # STEP 1: inject an UCE error, and kernel will set HWPosion flag for related page >> #einj_mem_uc single >> 0: single vaddr = 0xffffb0d75400 paddr = 4092d55b400 >> injecting ... >> triggering ... >> signal 7 code 4 addr 0xffffb0d75000 >> page not present >> Test passed >> >> # STEP 2: access the same page and it will trigger a synchronous error infinite loop >> devmem 0x4092d55b400 >> >> To fix above two issues, queue memory_failure() as a task_work so that it runs in >> the context of the process that is actually consuming the poisoned data. >> >> Signed-off-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com> >> Tested-by: Ma Wupeng <mawupeng1@huawei.com> >> Reviewed-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> >> Reviewed-by: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com> >> Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> >> --- >> drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- >> include/acpi/ghes.h | 3 -- >> include/linux/mm.h | 1 - >> mm/memory-failure.c | 13 ------- >> 4 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c >> index 93eb11482832..60d8044f14d1 100644 >> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c >> @@ -467,28 +467,42 @@ static void ghes_clear_estatus(struct ghes *ghes, >> } >> >> /* >> - * Called as task_work before returning to user-space. >> - * Ensure any queued work has been done before we return to the context that >> - * triggered the notification. >> + * struct task_work - for synchronous RAS event >> + * >> + * @twork: callback_head for task work >> + * @pfn: page frame number of corrupted page >> + * @flags: work control flags >> + * >> + * Structure to pass task work to be handled before >> + * returning to user-space via task_work_add(). >> */ >> -static void ghes_kick_task_work(struct callback_head *head) >> +struct task_work { >> + struct callback_head twork; >> + u64 pfn; >> + int flags; >> +}; > > I'd rename this as ghes_task_work. It is too generic name IMHO, easily > confused with task_work.h definitions. > > BR, Jarkko Agreed, I will rename it in next version. Thank you. Best Regards, Shuai
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c index 93eb11482832..60d8044f14d1 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c @@ -467,28 +467,42 @@ static void ghes_clear_estatus(struct ghes *ghes, } /* - * Called as task_work before returning to user-space. - * Ensure any queued work has been done before we return to the context that - * triggered the notification. + * struct task_work - for synchronous RAS event + * + * @twork: callback_head for task work + * @pfn: page frame number of corrupted page + * @flags: work control flags + * + * Structure to pass task work to be handled before + * returning to user-space via task_work_add(). */ -static void ghes_kick_task_work(struct callback_head *head) +struct task_work { + struct callback_head twork; + u64 pfn; + int flags; +}; + +static void memory_failure_cb(struct callback_head *twork) { - struct acpi_hest_generic_status *estatus; - struct ghes_estatus_node *estatus_node; - u32 node_len; + struct task_work *twcb = container_of(twork, struct task_work, twork); + unsigned long pfn = twcb->pfn; + int ret; - estatus_node = container_of(head, struct ghes_estatus_node, task_work); - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_MEMORY_FAILURE)) - memory_failure_queue_kick(estatus_node->task_work_cpu); + ret = memory_failure(twcb->pfn, twcb->flags); + gen_pool_free(ghes_estatus_pool, (unsigned long)twcb, sizeof(*twcb)); - estatus = GHES_ESTATUS_FROM_NODE(estatus_node); - node_len = GHES_ESTATUS_NODE_LEN(cper_estatus_len(estatus)); - gen_pool_free(ghes_estatus_pool, (unsigned long)estatus_node, node_len); + if (!ret || ret == -EHWPOISON || ret == -EOPNOTSUPP) + return; + + pr_err("%#lx: Sending SIGBUS to %s:%d due to hardware memory corruption\n", + pfn, current->comm, task_pid_nr(current)); + force_sig(SIGBUS); } static bool ghes_do_memory_failure(u64 physical_addr, int flags) { unsigned long pfn; + struct task_work *twcb; if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_MEMORY_FAILURE)) return false; @@ -501,6 +515,18 @@ static bool ghes_do_memory_failure(u64 physical_addr, int flags) return false; } + if (flags == MF_ACTION_REQUIRED && current->mm) { + twcb = (void *)gen_pool_alloc(ghes_estatus_pool, sizeof(*twcb)); + if (!twcb) + return false; + + twcb->pfn = pfn; + twcb->flags = flags; + init_task_work(&twcb->twork, memory_failure_cb); + task_work_add(current, &twcb->twork, TWA_RESUME); + return true; + } + memory_failure_queue(pfn, flags); return true; } @@ -745,7 +771,7 @@ int cxl_cper_kfifo_get(struct cxl_cper_work_data *wd) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(cxl_cper_kfifo_get, CXL); -static bool ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes, +static void ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes, const struct acpi_hest_generic_status *estatus) { int sev, sec_sev; @@ -810,8 +836,6 @@ static bool ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes, current->comm, task_pid_nr(current)); force_sig(SIGBUS); } - - return queued; } static void __ghes_print_estatus(const char *pfx, @@ -1113,9 +1137,7 @@ static void ghes_proc_in_irq(struct irq_work *irq_work) struct ghes_estatus_node *estatus_node; struct acpi_hest_generic *generic; struct acpi_hest_generic_status *estatus; - bool task_work_pending; u32 len, node_len; - int ret; llnode = llist_del_all(&ghes_estatus_llist); /* @@ -1130,25 +1152,16 @@ static void ghes_proc_in_irq(struct irq_work *irq_work) estatus = GHES_ESTATUS_FROM_NODE(estatus_node); len = cper_estatus_len(estatus); node_len = GHES_ESTATUS_NODE_LEN(len); - task_work_pending = ghes_do_proc(estatus_node->ghes, estatus); + + ghes_do_proc(estatus_node->ghes, estatus); + if (!ghes_estatus_cached(estatus)) { generic = estatus_node->generic; if (ghes_print_estatus(NULL, generic, estatus)) ghes_estatus_cache_add(generic, estatus); } - - if (task_work_pending && current->mm) { - estatus_node->task_work.func = ghes_kick_task_work; - estatus_node->task_work_cpu = smp_processor_id(); - ret = task_work_add(current, &estatus_node->task_work, - TWA_RESUME); - if (ret) - estatus_node->task_work.func = NULL; - } - - if (!estatus_node->task_work.func) - gen_pool_free(ghes_estatus_pool, - (unsigned long)estatus_node, node_len); + gen_pool_free(ghes_estatus_pool, (unsigned long)estatus_node, + node_len); llnode = next; } @@ -1209,7 +1222,6 @@ static int ghes_in_nmi_queue_one_entry(struct ghes *ghes, estatus_node->ghes = ghes; estatus_node->generic = ghes->generic; - estatus_node->task_work.func = NULL; estatus = GHES_ESTATUS_FROM_NODE(estatus_node); if (__ghes_read_estatus(estatus, buf_paddr, fixmap_idx, len)) { diff --git a/include/acpi/ghes.h b/include/acpi/ghes.h index be1dd4c1a917..ebd21b05fe6e 100644 --- a/include/acpi/ghes.h +++ b/include/acpi/ghes.h @@ -35,9 +35,6 @@ struct ghes_estatus_node { struct llist_node llnode; struct acpi_hest_generic *generic; struct ghes *ghes; - - int task_work_cpu; - struct callback_head task_work; }; struct ghes_estatus_cache { diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h index 13bff7cf03b7..304fa2e0c75e 100644 --- a/include/linux/mm.h +++ b/include/linux/mm.h @@ -3992,7 +3992,6 @@ enum mf_flags { int mf_dax_kill_procs(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t index, unsigned long count, int mf_flags); extern int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags); -extern void memory_failure_queue_kick(int cpu); extern int unpoison_memory(unsigned long pfn); extern atomic_long_t num_poisoned_pages __read_mostly; extern int soft_offline_page(unsigned long pfn, int flags); diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c index 7984e0d99d09..31561855a87e 100644 --- a/mm/memory-failure.c +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c @@ -2486,19 +2486,6 @@ static void memory_failure_work_func(struct work_struct *work) } } -/* - * Process memory_failure work queued on the specified CPU. - * Used to avoid return-to-userspace racing with the memory_failure workqueue. - */ -void memory_failure_queue_kick(int cpu) -{ - struct memory_failure_cpu *mf_cpu; - - mf_cpu = &per_cpu(memory_failure_cpu, cpu); - cancel_work_sync(&mf_cpu->work); - memory_failure_work_func(&mf_cpu->work); -} - static int __init memory_failure_init(void) { struct memory_failure_cpu *mf_cpu;
The memory uncorrected error could be signaled by asynchronous interrupt (specifically, SPI in arm64 platform), e.g. when an error is detected by a background scrubber, or signaled by synchronous exception (specifically, data abort excepction in arm64 platform), e.g. when a CPU tries to access a poisoned cache line. Currently, both synchronous and asynchronous error use memory_failure_queue() to schedule memory_failure() exectute in kworker context. As a result, when a user-space process is accessing a poisoned data, a data abort is taken and the memory_failure() is executed in the kworker context: - will send wrong si_code by SIGBUS signal in early_kill mode, and - can not kill the user-space in some cases resulting a synchronous error infinite loop Issue 1: send wrong si_code in early_kill mode Since commit a70297d22132 ("ACPI: APEI: set memory failure flags as MF_ACTION_REQUIRED on synchronous events")', the flag MF_ACTION_REQUIRED could be used to determine whether a synchronous exception occurs on ARM64 platform. When a synchronous exception is detected, the kernel is expected to terminate the current process which has accessed poisoned page. This is done by sending a SIGBUS signal with an error code BUS_MCEERR_AR, indicating an action-required machine check error on read. However, when kill_proc() is called to terminate the processes who have the poisoned page mapped, it sends the incorrect SIGBUS error code BUS_MCEERR_AO because the context in which it operates is not the one where the error was triggered. To reproduce this problem: #sysctl -w vm.memory_failure_early_kill=1 vm.memory_failure_early_kill = 1 # STEP2: inject an UCE error and consume it to trigger a synchronous error #einj_mem_uc single 0: single vaddr = 0xffffb0d75400 paddr = 4092d55b400 injecting ... triggering ... signal 7 code 5 addr 0xffffb0d75000 page not present Test passed The si_code (code 5) from einj_mem_uc indicates that it is BUS_MCEERR_AO error and it is not fact. After this patch: # STEP1: enable early kill mode #sysctl -w vm.memory_failure_early_kill=1 vm.memory_failure_early_kill = 1 # STEP2: inject an UCE error and consume it to trigger a synchronous error #einj_mem_uc single 0: single vaddr = 0xffffb0d75400 paddr = 4092d55b400 injecting ... triggering ... signal 7 code 4 addr 0xffffb0d75000 page not present Test passed The si_code (code 4) from einj_mem_uc indicates that it is BUS_MCEERR_AR error as we expected. Issue 2: a synchronous error infinite loop If a user-space process, e.g. devmem, a poisoned page which has been set HWPosion flag, kill_accessing_process() is called to send SIGBUS to the current processs with error info. Because the memory_failure() is executed in the kworker contex, it will just do nothing but return EFAULT. So, devmem will access the posioned page and trigger an excepction again, resulting in a synchronous error infinite loop. Such loop may cause platform firmware to exceed some threshold and reboot when Linux could have recovered from this error. To reproduce this problem: # STEP 1: inject an UCE error, and kernel will set HWPosion flag for related page #einj_mem_uc single 0: single vaddr = 0xffffb0d75400 paddr = 4092d55b400 injecting ... triggering ... signal 7 code 4 addr 0xffffb0d75000 page not present Test passed # STEP 2: access the same page and it will trigger a synchronous error infinite loop devmem 0x4092d55b400 To fix above two issues, queue memory_failure() as a task_work so that it runs in the context of the process that is actually consuming the poisoned data. Signed-off-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com> Tested-by: Ma Wupeng <mawupeng1@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> --- drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- include/acpi/ghes.h | 3 -- include/linux/mm.h | 1 - mm/memory-failure.c | 13 ------- 4 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)