diff mbox series

[1/1] nfsd: fix handling of WANT_DELEG_TIMESTAMPS on open

Message ID 20240920160551.52759-1-okorniev@redhat.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series [1/1] nfsd: fix handling of WANT_DELEG_TIMESTAMPS on open | expand

Commit Message

Olga Kornievskaia Sept. 20, 2024, 4:05 p.m. UTC
Current, the server returns that it supports NFS4_SHARE_WANT_DELEG_TIMESTAMPS
but when the client sends that on the open, knfsd returns back with
bad_xdr error.

Fixes: d0eab73d48a0 ("nfsd: add support for delegated timestamps")
Signed-off-by: Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>
---
 fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Comments

Jeff Layton Sept. 20, 2024, 4:24 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, 2024-09-20 at 12:05 -0400, Olga Kornievskaia wrote:
> Current, the server returns that it supports NFS4_SHARE_WANT_DELEG_TIMESTAMPS
> but when the client sends that on the open, knfsd returns back with
> bad_xdr error.
> 
> Fixes: d0eab73d48a0 ("nfsd: add support for delegated timestamps")
> Signed-off-by: Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>
> ---
>  fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
> index c0bad580ab6d..adda8b489175 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
> @@ -1109,6 +1109,7 @@ static __be32 nfsd4_decode_share_access(struct nfsd4_compoundargs *argp, u32 *sh
>  	case NFS4_SHARE_PUSH_DELEG_WHEN_UNCONTENDED:
>  	case (NFS4_SHARE_SIGNAL_DELEG_WHEN_RESRC_AVAIL |
>  	      NFS4_SHARE_PUSH_DELEG_WHEN_UNCONTENDED):
> +	case NFS4_SHARE_WANT_DELEG_TIMESTAMPS:
>  		return nfs_ok;
>  	}
>  	return nfserr_bad_xdr;

Ouch.

The problem here is that we had to drop the patch that added
OPEN_XOR_DELEGATION support. That patch reworked the flag handling in
this function in a way that allowed the new delstid flags to be
properly supported.

I think we probably want to resurrect the parts of this patch that
alter nfsd4_decode_share_access:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/20240905-delstid-v4-8-d3e5fd34d107@kernel.org/

Olga, would you be OK with that approach instead?
Chuck Lever III Sept. 20, 2024, 4:30 p.m. UTC | #2
> On Sep 20, 2024, at 12:24 PM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 2024-09-20 at 12:05 -0400, Olga Kornievskaia wrote:
>> Current, the server returns that it supports NFS4_SHARE_WANT_DELEG_TIMESTAMPS
>> but when the client sends that on the open, knfsd returns back with
>> bad_xdr error.
>> 
>> Fixes: d0eab73d48a0 ("nfsd: add support for delegated timestamps")
>> Signed-off-by: Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
>> index c0bad580ab6d..adda8b489175 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
>> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
>> @@ -1109,6 +1109,7 @@ static __be32 nfsd4_decode_share_access(struct nfsd4_compoundargs *argp, u32 *sh
>> case NFS4_SHARE_PUSH_DELEG_WHEN_UNCONTENDED:
>> case (NFS4_SHARE_SIGNAL_DELEG_WHEN_RESRC_AVAIL |
>>       NFS4_SHARE_PUSH_DELEG_WHEN_UNCONTENDED):
>> + case NFS4_SHARE_WANT_DELEG_TIMESTAMPS:
>> return nfs_ok;
>> }
>> return nfserr_bad_xdr;
> 
> Ouch.
> 
> The problem here is that we had to drop the patch that added
> OPEN_XOR_DELEGATION support. That patch reworked the flag handling in
> this function in a way that allowed the new delstid flags to be
> properly supported.
> 
> I think we probably want to resurrect the parts of this patch that
> alter nfsd4_decode_share_access:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/20240905-delstid-v4-8-d3e5fd34d107@kernel.org/
> 
> Olga, would you be OK with that approach instead?

At this point, I'd like to consider postponing the delstid patches
until v6.13. They haven't gotten enough testing in their current
form...

--
Chuck Lever
Jeff Layton Sept. 20, 2024, 4:34 p.m. UTC | #3
On Fri, 2024-09-20 at 16:30 +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote:
> 
> > On Sep 20, 2024, at 12:24 PM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > On Fri, 2024-09-20 at 12:05 -0400, Olga Kornievskaia wrote:
> > > Current, the server returns that it supports NFS4_SHARE_WANT_DELEG_TIMESTAMPS
> > > but when the client sends that on the open, knfsd returns back with
> > > bad_xdr error.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: d0eab73d48a0 ("nfsd: add support for delegated timestamps")
> > > Signed-off-by: Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > > fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c | 1 +
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
> > > index c0bad580ab6d..adda8b489175 100644
> > > --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
> > > +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
> > > @@ -1109,6 +1109,7 @@ static __be32 nfsd4_decode_share_access(struct nfsd4_compoundargs *argp, u32 *sh
> > > case NFS4_SHARE_PUSH_DELEG_WHEN_UNCONTENDED:
> > > case (NFS4_SHARE_SIGNAL_DELEG_WHEN_RESRC_AVAIL |
> > >       NFS4_SHARE_PUSH_DELEG_WHEN_UNCONTENDED):
> > > + case NFS4_SHARE_WANT_DELEG_TIMESTAMPS:
> > > return nfs_ok;
> > > }
> > > return nfserr_bad_xdr;
> > 
> > Ouch.
> > 
> > The problem here is that we had to drop the patch that added
> > OPEN_XOR_DELEGATION support. That patch reworked the flag handling in
> > this function in a way that allowed the new delstid flags to be
> > properly supported.
> > 
> > I think we probably want to resurrect the parts of this patch that
> > alter nfsd4_decode_share_access:
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/20240905-delstid-v4-8-d3e5fd34d107@kernel.org/
> > 
> > Olga, would you be OK with that approach instead?
> 
> At this point, I'd like to consider postponing the delstid patches
> until v6.13. They haven't gotten enough testing in their current
> form...
> 

It's your call, but that seems like an extreme reaction to a flag
handling fix, given that we have several weeks of -rc's ahead of us.
Olga Kornievskaia Sept. 20, 2024, 4:44 p.m. UTC | #4
On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 12:34 PM Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2024-09-20 at 16:30 +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote:
> >
> > > On Sep 20, 2024, at 12:24 PM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2024-09-20 at 12:05 -0400, Olga Kornievskaia wrote:
> > > > Current, the server returns that it supports NFS4_SHARE_WANT_DELEG_TIMESTAMPS
> > > > but when the client sends that on the open, knfsd returns back with
> > > > bad_xdr error.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: d0eab73d48a0 ("nfsd: add support for delegated timestamps")
> > > > Signed-off-by: Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c | 1 +
> > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
> > > > index c0bad580ab6d..adda8b489175 100644
> > > > --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
> > > > +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
> > > > @@ -1109,6 +1109,7 @@ static __be32 nfsd4_decode_share_access(struct nfsd4_compoundargs *argp, u32 *sh
> > > > case NFS4_SHARE_PUSH_DELEG_WHEN_UNCONTENDED:
> > > > case (NFS4_SHARE_SIGNAL_DELEG_WHEN_RESRC_AVAIL |
> > > >       NFS4_SHARE_PUSH_DELEG_WHEN_UNCONTENDED):
> > > > + case NFS4_SHARE_WANT_DELEG_TIMESTAMPS:
> > > > return nfs_ok;
> > > > }
> > > > return nfserr_bad_xdr;
> > >
> > > Ouch.
> > >
> > > The problem here is that we had to drop the patch that added
> > > OPEN_XOR_DELEGATION support. That patch reworked the flag handling in
> > > this function in a way that allowed the new delstid flags to be
> > > properly supported.
> > >
> > > I think we probably want to resurrect the parts of this patch that
> > > alter nfsd4_decode_share_access:
> > >
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/20240905-delstid-v4-8-d3e5fd34d107@kernel.org/
> > >
> > > Olga, would you be OK with that approach instead?
> >
> > At this point, I'd like to consider postponing the delstid patches
> > until v6.13. They haven't gotten enough testing in their current
> > form...
> >
>
> It's your call, but that seems like an extreme reaction to a flag
> handling fix, given that we have several weeks of -rc's ahead of us.

I'm OK with whatever fix/approach it's going to go (Jeff if you have a
patch to test that would go on top of what's in Chuck's nfsd-next and
fixes the issue do post it) . I'm not ok with the code that's at the
moment in nfsd-next :).

> --
> Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
>
Chuck Lever III Sept. 20, 2024, 6:18 p.m. UTC | #5
> On Sep 20, 2024, at 12:34 PM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 2024-09-20 at 16:30 +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote:
>> 
>>> On Sep 20, 2024, at 12:24 PM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Fri, 2024-09-20 at 12:05 -0400, Olga Kornievskaia wrote:
>>>> Current, the server returns that it supports NFS4_SHARE_WANT_DELEG_TIMESTAMPS
>>>> but when the client sends that on the open, knfsd returns back with
>>>> bad_xdr error.
>>>> 
>>>> Fixes: d0eab73d48a0 ("nfsd: add support for delegated timestamps")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c | 1 +
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>> 
>>>> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
>>>> index c0bad580ab6d..adda8b489175 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
>>>> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
>>>> @@ -1109,6 +1109,7 @@ static __be32 nfsd4_decode_share_access(struct nfsd4_compoundargs *argp, u32 *sh
>>>> case NFS4_SHARE_PUSH_DELEG_WHEN_UNCONTENDED:
>>>> case (NFS4_SHARE_SIGNAL_DELEG_WHEN_RESRC_AVAIL |
>>>>      NFS4_SHARE_PUSH_DELEG_WHEN_UNCONTENDED):
>>>> + case NFS4_SHARE_WANT_DELEG_TIMESTAMPS:
>>>> return nfs_ok;
>>>> }
>>>> return nfserr_bad_xdr;
>>> 
>>> Ouch.
>>> 
>>> The problem here is that we had to drop the patch that added
>>> OPEN_XOR_DELEGATION support. That patch reworked the flag handling in
>>> this function in a way that allowed the new delstid flags to be
>>> properly supported.
>>> 
>>> I think we probably want to resurrect the parts of this patch that
>>> alter nfsd4_decode_share_access:
>>> 
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/20240905-delstid-v4-8-d3e5fd34d107@kernel.org/
>>> 
>>> Olga, would you be OK with that approach instead?
>> 
>> At this point, I'd like to consider postponing the delstid patches
>> until v6.13. They haven't gotten enough testing in their current
>> form...
> 
> It's your call, but that seems like an extreme reaction to a flag
> handling fix, given that we have several weeks of -rc's ahead of us.

It's not just this small problem that worries me.

I pulled in v4 of the delstid patches pretty much at the last
moment for v6.12 development. So far, there's been an 80%
performance regression, and the surgery to work around that
issue introduced another bug that invalidates all NFSv4.2 test
results since that surgery, just a week ago.

The delstid patches impact an already heavily-used code path
(OPEN). You've already found one or two bugs in the client
side as well. This isn't something the can be disabled by
distros until it is ready -- it's baked into a popular code
path as soon as it goes upstream, and NFSv4.2 is the current
default.

So I can't say with confidence that this code is stable and
ready to merge. If we had another week or two before v6.11
final, there wouldn't be a question, but it's already a week
into the v6.12 merge window, and I need to submit a pull
request in the next few days. A 6.11-rc8 would have been
extremely helpful, but we didn't get one.

Exposing this change set to the cauldron that is bake-a-thon
would be valuable, IMO, for both the client and the server.


--
Chuck Lever
Jeff Layton Sept. 20, 2024, 7:11 p.m. UTC | #6
On Fri, 2024-09-20 at 18:18 +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote:
> 
> > On Sep 20, 2024, at 12:34 PM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > On Fri, 2024-09-20 at 16:30 +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Sep 20, 2024, at 12:24 PM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > On Fri, 2024-09-20 at 12:05 -0400, Olga Kornievskaia wrote:
> > > > > Current, the server returns that it supports NFS4_SHARE_WANT_DELEG_TIMESTAMPS
> > > > > but when the client sends that on the open, knfsd returns back with
> > > > > bad_xdr error.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Fixes: d0eab73d48a0 ("nfsd: add support for delegated timestamps")
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c | 1 +
> > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
> > > > > index c0bad580ab6d..adda8b489175 100644
> > > > > --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
> > > > > +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
> > > > > @@ -1109,6 +1109,7 @@ static __be32 nfsd4_decode_share_access(struct nfsd4_compoundargs *argp, u32 *sh
> > > > > case NFS4_SHARE_PUSH_DELEG_WHEN_UNCONTENDED:
> > > > > case (NFS4_SHARE_SIGNAL_DELEG_WHEN_RESRC_AVAIL |
> > > > >      NFS4_SHARE_PUSH_DELEG_WHEN_UNCONTENDED):
> > > > > + case NFS4_SHARE_WANT_DELEG_TIMESTAMPS:
> > > > > return nfs_ok;
> > > > > }
> > > > > return nfserr_bad_xdr;
> > > > 
> > > > Ouch.
> > > > 
> > > > The problem here is that we had to drop the patch that added
> > > > OPEN_XOR_DELEGATION support. That patch reworked the flag handling in
> > > > this function in a way that allowed the new delstid flags to be
> > > > properly supported.
> > > > 
> > > > I think we probably want to resurrect the parts of this patch that
> > > > alter nfsd4_decode_share_access:
> > > > 
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/20240905-delstid-v4-8-d3e5fd34d107@kernel.org/
> > > > 
> > > > Olga, would you be OK with that approach instead?
> > > 
> > > At this point, I'd like to consider postponing the delstid patches
> > > until v6.13. They haven't gotten enough testing in their current
> > > form...
> > 
> > It's your call, but that seems like an extreme reaction to a flag
> > handling fix, given that we have several weeks of -rc's ahead of us.
> 
> It's not just this small problem that worries me.
> 
> I pulled in v4 of the delstid patches pretty much at the last
> moment for v6.12 development. So far, there's been an 80%
> performance regression, and the surgery to work around that
> issue introduced another bug that invalidates all NFSv4.2 test
> results since that surgery, just a week ago.
> 
> The delstid patches impact an already heavily-used code path
> (OPEN). You've already found one or two bugs in the client
> side as well. This isn't something the can be disabled by
> distros until it is ready -- it's baked into a popular code
> path as soon as it goes upstream, and NFSv4.2 is the current
> default.
> 
> So I can't say with confidence that this code is stable and
> ready to merge. If we had another week or two before v6.11
> final, there wouldn't be a question, but it's already a week
> into the v6.12 merge window, and I need to submit a pull
> request in the next few days. A 6.11-rc8 would have been
> extremely helpful, but we didn't get one.
> 
> Exposing this change set to the cauldron that is bake-a-thon
> would be valuable, IMO, for both the client and the server.
> 

Fair enough. These are not features that anyone is particularly
clamoring for, so dropping them for now is fine. I'll plan to spin up a
new set once I'm back from travel (another week or so).
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
index c0bad580ab6d..adda8b489175 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
@@ -1109,6 +1109,7 @@  static __be32 nfsd4_decode_share_access(struct nfsd4_compoundargs *argp, u32 *sh
 	case NFS4_SHARE_PUSH_DELEG_WHEN_UNCONTENDED:
 	case (NFS4_SHARE_SIGNAL_DELEG_WHEN_RESRC_AVAIL |
 	      NFS4_SHARE_PUSH_DELEG_WHEN_UNCONTENDED):
+	case NFS4_SHARE_WANT_DELEG_TIMESTAMPS:
 		return nfs_ok;
 	}
 	return nfserr_bad_xdr;