Message ID | 20240912050552.779356-4-arun.r.murthy@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | Some correction in the DP Link Training dequence | expand |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Intel-xe <intel-xe-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Arun R > Murthy > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2024 10:36 AM > To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Murthy, Arun R <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>; Srikanth V, NagaVenkata > <nagavenkata.srikanth.v@intel.com> > Subject: [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/dp: Include the time taken by AUX Tx for > timeout > > As per DP spec the timeout for LANE_CHANNEL_EQ_DONE is 400ms. But this Adding where in DP spec example dp2.1 section x.x is a good idea > timeout value is exclusively for the Aux RD Interval and excludes the time > consumed for the AUX Tx (i.e reading/writing FFE presets). Add another > 50ms for these AUX Tx to the 400ms timeout. Is this something we came up with by trial and error or is this also a part of spec Regards, Suraj Kandpal > > Signed-off-by: Srikanth V NagaVenkata <nagavenkata.srikanth.v@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c > index ca179bed46ad..b6573934c6dd 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c > @@ -1414,7 +1414,7 @@ intel_dp_128b132b_lane_eq(struct intel_dp > *intel_dp, > } > > /* Time budget for the LANEx_EQ_DONE Sequence */ > - deadline = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies_timeout(400); > + deadline = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies_timeout(450); > > for (try = 0; try < max_tries; try++) { > fsleep(delay_us); > -- > 2.25.1
> > -----Original Message----- > > From: Intel-xe <intel-xe-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of > > Arun R Murthy > > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2024 10:36 AM > > To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > > Cc: Murthy, Arun R <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>; Srikanth V, NagaVenkata > > <nagavenkata.srikanth.v@intel.com> > > Subject: [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/dp: Include the time taken by AUX Tx for > > timeout > > > > As per DP spec the timeout for LANE_CHANNEL_EQ_DONE is 400ms. But this > > Adding where in DP spec example dp2.1 section x.x is a good idea > Please refer to section 3.5.2.16.1 128b/132b DP LANEx_CHANNEL_EQ_DONE Sequnce and Figure3-51: 128b/132b DP EQ Time Budget Illustration of DP2.1a spec. > > timeout value is exclusively for the Aux RD Interval and excludes the > > time consumed for the AUX Tx (i.e reading/writing FFE presets). Add > > another 50ms for these AUX Tx to the 400ms timeout. > > Is this something we came up with by trial and error or is this also a part of spec > It's not by trail and erros. Timeout value of 450ms is part of DP. > Regards, > Suraj Kandpal > > > > Signed-off-by: Srikanth V NagaVenkata > > <nagavenkata.srikanth.v@intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c > > index ca179bed46ad..b6573934c6dd 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c > > @@ -1414,7 +1414,7 @@ intel_dp_128b132b_lane_eq(struct intel_dp > > *intel_dp, > > } > > > > /* Time budget for the LANEx_EQ_DONE Sequence */ > > - deadline = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies_timeout(400); > > + deadline = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies_timeout(450); > > > > for (try = 0; try < max_tries; try++) { > > fsleep(delay_us); > > -- > > 2.25.1
> -----Original Message----- > From: Srikanth V, NagaVenkata <nagavenkata.srikanth.v@intel.com> > Sent: Monday, September 23, 2024 12:02 PM > To: Kandpal, Suraj <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>; Murthy, Arun R > <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>; intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org; intel- > gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Murthy, Arun R <arun.r.murthy@intel.com> > Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/dp: Include the time taken by AUX Tx for > timeout > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Intel-xe <intel-xe-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of > > > Arun R Murthy > > > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2024 10:36 AM > > > To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > > > Cc: Murthy, Arun R <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>; Srikanth V, > > > NagaVenkata <nagavenkata.srikanth.v@intel.com> > > > Subject: [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/dp: Include the time taken by AUX Tx > > > for timeout > > > > > > As per DP spec the timeout for LANE_CHANNEL_EQ_DONE is 400ms. But > > > this > > > > Adding where in DP spec example dp2.1 section x.x is a good idea > > > Please refer to section 3.5.2.16.1 128b/132b DP LANEx_CHANNEL_EQ_DONE > Sequnce and Figure3-51: 128b/132b DP EQ Time Budget Illustration of > DP2.1a spec. > > > > timeout value is exclusively for the Aux RD Interval and excludes > > > the time consumed for the AUX Tx (i.e reading/writing FFE presets). > > > Add another 50ms for these AUX Tx to the 400ms timeout. > > > > Is this something we came up with by trial and error or is this also a > > part of spec > > > It's not by trail and erros. Timeout value of 450ms is part of DP. Ahh okay I see it, After adding the dp spec reference in the commit message this patch LGTM, Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> > > > Regards, > > Suraj Kandpal > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Srikanth V NagaVenkata > > > <nagavenkata.srikanth.v@intel.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c > > > index ca179bed46ad..b6573934c6dd 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c > > > @@ -1414,7 +1414,7 @@ intel_dp_128b132b_lane_eq(struct intel_dp > > > *intel_dp, > > > } > > > > > > /* Time budget for the LANEx_EQ_DONE Sequence */ > > > - deadline = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies_timeout(400); > > > + deadline = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies_timeout(450); > > > > > > for (try = 0; try < max_tries; try++) { > > > fsleep(delay_us); > > > -- > > > 2.25.1
On Mon, 23 Sep 2024, "Srikanth V, NagaVenkata" <nagavenkata.srikanth.v@intel.com> wrote: >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Intel-xe <intel-xe-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of >> > Arun R Murthy >> > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2024 10:36 AM >> > To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org >> > Cc: Murthy, Arun R <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>; Srikanth V, NagaVenkata >> > <nagavenkata.srikanth.v@intel.com> >> > Subject: [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/dp: Include the time taken by AUX Tx for >> > timeout >> > >> > As per DP spec the timeout for LANE_CHANNEL_EQ_DONE is 400ms. But this >> >> Adding where in DP spec example dp2.1 section x.x is a good idea >> > Please refer to section 3.5.2.16.1 128b/132b DP LANEx_CHANNEL_EQ_DONE Sequnce > and Figure3-51: 128b/132b DP EQ Time Budget Illustration of DP2.1a spec. > >> > timeout value is exclusively for the Aux RD Interval and excludes the >> > time consumed for the AUX Tx (i.e reading/writing FFE presets). Add >> > another 50ms for these AUX Tx to the 400ms timeout. >> >> Is this something we came up with by trial and error or is this also a part of spec >> > It's not by trail and erros. Timeout value of 450ms is part of DP. It's a very poorly written spec, and contradicts itself. The only place where I see 450 ms even mentioned is Figure 3-52. But everywhere else it seems to say many times 400 ms is the max, without a hint that it would be exclusive of aux. It does not say anything about the sum of rd interval being related to the max of 400 ms either. Regardless, I have no qualms about relaxing the timeout by 50 ms. With the commit message explaining the above, with references, Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> > >> Regards, >> Suraj Kandpal >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Srikanth V NagaVenkata >> > <nagavenkata.srikanth.v@intel.com> >> > Signed-off-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com> >> > --- >> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c | 2 +- >> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c >> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c >> > index ca179bed46ad..b6573934c6dd 100644 >> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c >> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c >> > @@ -1414,7 +1414,7 @@ intel_dp_128b132b_lane_eq(struct intel_dp >> > *intel_dp, >> > } >> > >> > /* Time budget for the LANEx_EQ_DONE Sequence */ >> > - deadline = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies_timeout(400); >> > + deadline = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies_timeout(450); >> > >> > for (try = 0; try < max_tries; try++) { >> > fsleep(delay_us); >> > -- >> > 2.25.1 >
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c index ca179bed46ad..b6573934c6dd 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c @@ -1414,7 +1414,7 @@ intel_dp_128b132b_lane_eq(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, } /* Time budget for the LANEx_EQ_DONE Sequence */ - deadline = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies_timeout(400); + deadline = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies_timeout(450); for (try = 0; try < max_tries; try++) { fsleep(delay_us);