| Message ID | 20240924132451.47121-1-thuth@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | docs: Mark "gluster" support in QEMU as deprecated | expand |
On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 15:24:51 +0200, Thomas Huth wrote: > According to https://marc.info/?l=fedora-devel-list&m=171934833215726 > the GlusterFS development effectively ended. Thus mark it as deprecated > in QEMU, so we can remove it in a future release if the project does > not gain momentum again. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> > --- > docs/about/deprecated.rst | 9 +++++++++ > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/docs/about/deprecated.rst b/docs/about/deprecated.rst > index ed31d4b0b2..b231aa3948 100644 > --- a/docs/about/deprecated.rst > +++ b/docs/about/deprecated.rst > @@ -395,6 +395,15 @@ Specifying the iSCSI password in plain text on the command line using the > used instead, to refer to a ``--object secret...`` instance that provides > a password via a file, or encrypted. > > +``gluster`` backend (since 9.2) > +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > + > +According to https://marc.info/?l=fedora-devel-list&m=171934833215726 > +the GlusterFS development effectively ended. Unless the development > +gains momentum again, the QEMU project might remove the gluster backend > +in a future release. Shouldn't also the 'gluster' enum entry of 'BlockdevDriver' (qapi/block-core.json) be marked as deprecated?
On Tue, 2024-09-24 at 15:24 +0200, Thomas Huth wrote: > According to https://marc.info/?l=fedora-devel-list&m=171934833215726 > the GlusterFS development effectively ended. Thus mark it as > deprecated > in QEMU, so we can remove it in a future release if the project does > not gain momentum again. As a former Gluster developer/maintainer, this makes sense to me. Feel free to add my Acked-by or equivalent signoff. Cheers, Niels > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> > --- > docs/about/deprecated.rst | 9 +++++++++ > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/docs/about/deprecated.rst b/docs/about/deprecated.rst > index ed31d4b0b2..b231aa3948 100644 > --- a/docs/about/deprecated.rst > +++ b/docs/about/deprecated.rst > @@ -395,6 +395,15 @@ Specifying the iSCSI password in plain text on > the command line using the > used instead, to refer to a ``--object secret...`` instance that > provides > a password via a file, or encrypted. > > +``gluster`` backend (since 9.2) > +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > + > +According to > https://marc.info/?l=fedora-devel-list&m=171934833215726 > +the GlusterFS development effectively ended. Unless the development > +gains momentum again, the QEMU project might remove the gluster > backend > +in a future release. > + > + > Character device options > '''''''''''''''''''''''' >
diff --git a/docs/about/deprecated.rst b/docs/about/deprecated.rst index ed31d4b0b2..b231aa3948 100644 --- a/docs/about/deprecated.rst +++ b/docs/about/deprecated.rst @@ -395,6 +395,15 @@ Specifying the iSCSI password in plain text on the command line using the used instead, to refer to a ``--object secret...`` instance that provides a password via a file, or encrypted. +``gluster`` backend (since 9.2) +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +According to https://marc.info/?l=fedora-devel-list&m=171934833215726 +the GlusterFS development effectively ended. Unless the development +gains momentum again, the QEMU project might remove the gluster backend +in a future release. + + Character device options ''''''''''''''''''''''''
According to https://marc.info/?l=fedora-devel-list&m=171934833215726 the GlusterFS development effectively ended. Thus mark it as deprecated in QEMU, so we can remove it in a future release if the project does not gain momentum again. Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> --- docs/about/deprecated.rst | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)