| Message ID | 20240926075034.39475-1-riyandhiman14@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | btrfs: remove redundant stop_loop variable in scrub_stripe() | expand |
On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 8:51 AM Riyan Dhiman <riyandhiman14@gmail.com> wrote: > > The variable stop_loop was originally introduced in commit > 625f1c8dc66d7 (Btrfs: improve the loop of scrub_stripe). It was initialized > to 0 in commit 3b080b2564287 (Btrfs: scrub raid56 stripes in the right way). > However, in a later commit 18d30ab961497 (btrfs: scrub: use scrub_simple_mirror() > to handle RAID56 data stripe scrub), the code that modified stop_loop was removed, > making the variable redundant. > > Currently, stop_loop is only initialized with 0 and is never used or modified > within the scrub_stripe() function. As a result, this patch removes the > stop_loop variable to clean up the code and eliminate unnecessary redundancy. > > This change has no impact on functionality, as stop_loop was never utilized > in any meaningful way in the final version of the code. > > Signed-off-by: Riyan Dhiman <riyandhiman14@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Looks good, thanks. > --- > Compile tested only > > fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 9 +-------- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c > index 3a3427428074..43431065d981 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c > @@ -2256,7 +2256,6 @@ static noinline_for_stack int scrub_stripe(struct scrub_ctx *sctx, > /* Offset inside the chunk */ > u64 offset; > u64 stripe_logical; > - int stop_loop = 0; > > /* Extent_path should be released by now. */ > ASSERT(sctx->extent_path.nodes[0] == NULL); > @@ -2370,14 +2369,8 @@ static noinline_for_stack int scrub_stripe(struct scrub_ctx *sctx, > logical += increment; > physical += BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN; > spin_lock(&sctx->stat_lock); > - if (stop_loop) > - sctx->stat.last_physical = > - map->stripes[stripe_index].physical + dev_stripe_len; > - else > - sctx->stat.last_physical = physical; > + sctx->stat.last_physical = physical; > spin_unlock(&sctx->stat_lock); > - if (stop_loop) > - break; > } > out: > ret2 = flush_scrub_stripes(sctx); > -- > 2.46.1 > >
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c index 3a3427428074..43431065d981 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c @@ -2256,7 +2256,6 @@ static noinline_for_stack int scrub_stripe(struct scrub_ctx *sctx, /* Offset inside the chunk */ u64 offset; u64 stripe_logical; - int stop_loop = 0; /* Extent_path should be released by now. */ ASSERT(sctx->extent_path.nodes[0] == NULL); @@ -2370,14 +2369,8 @@ static noinline_for_stack int scrub_stripe(struct scrub_ctx *sctx, logical += increment; physical += BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN; spin_lock(&sctx->stat_lock); - if (stop_loop) - sctx->stat.last_physical = - map->stripes[stripe_index].physical + dev_stripe_len; - else - sctx->stat.last_physical = physical; + sctx->stat.last_physical = physical; spin_unlock(&sctx->stat_lock); - if (stop_loop) - break; } out: ret2 = flush_scrub_stripes(sctx);
The variable stop_loop was originally introduced in commit 625f1c8dc66d7 (Btrfs: improve the loop of scrub_stripe). It was initialized to 0 in commit 3b080b2564287 (Btrfs: scrub raid56 stripes in the right way). However, in a later commit 18d30ab961497 (btrfs: scrub: use scrub_simple_mirror() to handle RAID56 data stripe scrub), the code that modified stop_loop was removed, making the variable redundant. Currently, stop_loop is only initialized with 0 and is never used or modified within the scrub_stripe() function. As a result, this patch removes the stop_loop variable to clean up the code and eliminate unnecessary redundancy. This change has no impact on functionality, as stop_loop was never utilized in any meaningful way in the final version of the code. Signed-off-by: Riyan Dhiman <riyandhiman14@gmail.com> --- Compile tested only fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 9 +-------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)