diff mbox series

selftests/bpf: Add __init and __exit to the functions bpf_test_no_cfi_init()/bpf_test_no_cfi_exit()

Message ID 20240930013301.10817-1-tianyaxiong@kylinos.cn (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series selftests/bpf: Add __init and __exit to the functions bpf_test_no_cfi_init()/bpf_test_no_cfi_exit() | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Not a local patch
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18

Commit Message

Yaxiong Tian Sept. 30, 2024, 1:33 a.m. UTC
From: Yaxiong Tian <iambestgod@outlook.com>

To save some running memory,Add __init and __exit to the
module load/unload functions.

Signed-off-by: Yaxiong Tian <tianyaxiong@kylinos.cn>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_test_no_cfi/bpf_test_no_cfi.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Daniel Borkmann Oct. 2, 2024, 12:15 p.m. UTC | #1
On 9/30/24 3:33 AM, Yaxiong Tian wrote:
> From: Yaxiong Tian <iambestgod@outlook.com>
>
> To save some running memory,Add __init and __exit to the
> module load/unload functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yaxiong Tian <tianyaxiong@kylinos.cn>
> ---
>   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_test_no_cfi/bpf_test_no_cfi.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_test_no_cfi/bpf_test_no_cfi.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_test_no_cfi/bpf_test_no_cfi.c
> index 948eb3962732..aa571ab3c6c6 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_test_no_cfi/bpf_test_no_cfi.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_test_no_cfi/bpf_test_no_cfi.c
> @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static struct bpf_struct_ops test_no_cif_ops = {
>   	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
>   };
>   
> -static int bpf_test_no_cfi_init(void)
> +static int __init bpf_test_no_cfi_init(void)
>   {
>   	int ret;
>   
> @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static int bpf_test_no_cfi_init(void)
>   	return ret;
>   }
>   
> -static void bpf_test_no_cfi_exit(void)
> +static void __exit bpf_test_no_cfi_exit(void)
>   {
>   }
Not that the memory saving matters too much in this context, but lets also
annotate bpf_testmod_init and bpf_testmod_exit while at it?

Thanks,
Daniel
Yaxiong Tian Oct. 8, 2024, 1:11 a.m. UTC | #2
在 2024/10/2 20:15, Daniel Borkmann 写道:
> On 9/30/24 3:33 AM, Yaxiong Tian wrote:
>> From: Yaxiong Tian <iambestgod@outlook.com>
>>
>> To save some running memory,Add __init and __exit to the
>> module load/unload functions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yaxiong Tian <tianyaxiong@kylinos.cn>
>> ---
>>   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_test_no_cfi/bpf_test_no_cfi.c | 4 ++--
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git 
>> a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_test_no_cfi/bpf_test_no_cfi.c 
>> b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_test_no_cfi/bpf_test_no_cfi.c
>> index 948eb3962732..aa571ab3c6c6 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_test_no_cfi/bpf_test_no_cfi.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_test_no_cfi/bpf_test_no_cfi.c
>> @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static struct bpf_struct_ops test_no_cif_ops = {
>>       .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>>   };
>>   -static int bpf_test_no_cfi_init(void)
>> +static int __init bpf_test_no_cfi_init(void)
>>   {
>>       int ret;
>>   @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static int bpf_test_no_cfi_init(void)
>>       return ret;
>>   }
>>   -static void bpf_test_no_cfi_exit(void)
>> +static void __exit bpf_test_no_cfi_exit(void)
>>   {
>>   }
> Not that the memory saving matters too much in this context, but lets 
> also
> annotate bpf_testmod_init and bpf_testmod_exit while at it?
>
Of course, it will provide a reference for those who are not familiar 
with this part of the code.
> Thanks,
> Daniel
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_test_no_cfi/bpf_test_no_cfi.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_test_no_cfi/bpf_test_no_cfi.c
index 948eb3962732..aa571ab3c6c6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_test_no_cfi/bpf_test_no_cfi.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_test_no_cfi/bpf_test_no_cfi.c
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@  static struct bpf_struct_ops test_no_cif_ops = {
 	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
 };
 
-static int bpf_test_no_cfi_init(void)
+static int __init bpf_test_no_cfi_init(void)
 {
 	int ret;
 
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@  static int bpf_test_no_cfi_init(void)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static void bpf_test_no_cfi_exit(void)
+static void __exit bpf_test_no_cfi_exit(void)
 {
 }