Message ID | 20241014153041.1110364-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 11d06f0aaef89f4cad68b92510bd9decff2d7b87 |
Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2,net] net: dsa: vsc73xx: fix reception from VLAN-unaware bridges | expand |
On 10/14/24 08:30, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > Similar to the situation described for sja1105 in commit 1f9fc48fd302 > ("net: dsa: sja1105: fix reception from VLAN-unaware bridges"), the > vsc73xx driver uses tag_8021q and doesn't need the ds->untag_bridge_pvid > request. In fact, this option breaks packet reception. > > The ds->untag_bridge_pvid option strips VLANs from packets received on > VLAN-unaware bridge ports. But those VLANs should already be stripped > by tag_vsc73xx_8021q.c as part of vsc73xx_rcv() - they are not VLANs in > VLAN-unaware mode, but DSA tags. Thus, dsa_software_vlan_untag() tries > to untag a VLAN that doesn't exist, corrupting the packet. > > Fixes: 93e4649efa96 ("net: dsa: provide a software untagging function on RX for VLAN-aware bridges") > Tested-by: Pawel Dembicki <paweldembicki@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 5:30 PM Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> wrote: > Similar to the situation described for sja1105 in commit 1f9fc48fd302 > ("net: dsa: sja1105: fix reception from VLAN-unaware bridges"), the > vsc73xx driver uses tag_8021q and doesn't need the ds->untag_bridge_pvid > request. In fact, this option breaks packet reception. > > The ds->untag_bridge_pvid option strips VLANs from packets received on > VLAN-unaware bridge ports. But those VLANs should already be stripped > by tag_vsc73xx_8021q.c as part of vsc73xx_rcv() - they are not VLANs in > VLAN-unaware mode, but DSA tags. Thus, dsa_software_vlan_untag() tries > to untag a VLAN that doesn't exist, corrupting the packet. > > Fixes: 93e4649efa96 ("net: dsa: provide a software untagging function on RX for VLAN-aware bridges") > Tested-by: Pawel Dembicki <paweldembicki@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Yours, Linus Walleij
Hello: This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main) by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>: On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 18:30:41 +0300 you wrote: > Similar to the situation described for sja1105 in commit 1f9fc48fd302 > ("net: dsa: sja1105: fix reception from VLAN-unaware bridges"), the > vsc73xx driver uses tag_8021q and doesn't need the ds->untag_bridge_pvid > request. In fact, this option breaks packet reception. > > The ds->untag_bridge_pvid option strips VLANs from packets received on > VLAN-unaware bridge ports. But those VLANs should already be stripped > by tag_vsc73xx_8021q.c as part of vsc73xx_rcv() - they are not VLANs in > VLAN-unaware mode, but DSA tags. Thus, dsa_software_vlan_untag() tries > to untag a VLAN that doesn't exist, corrupting the packet. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [v2,net] net: dsa: vsc73xx: fix reception from VLAN-unaware bridges https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/11d06f0aaef8 You are awesome, thank you!
diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/vitesse-vsc73xx-core.c b/drivers/net/dsa/vitesse-vsc73xx-core.c index e4b98fd51643..f18aa321053d 100644 --- a/drivers/net/dsa/vitesse-vsc73xx-core.c +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/vitesse-vsc73xx-core.c @@ -851,7 +851,6 @@ static int vsc73xx_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds) dev_info(vsc->dev, "set up the switch\n"); - ds->untag_bridge_pvid = true; ds->max_num_bridges = DSA_TAG_8021Q_MAX_NUM_BRIDGES; ds->fdb_isolation = true;