diff mbox series

[net-next,07/13] net: fec: fec_probe(): update quirk: bring IRQs in correct order

Message ID 20241016-fec-cleanups-v1-7-de783bd15e6a@pengutronix.de (mailing list archive)
State New
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series net: fec: cleanups, update quirk, update IRQ naming | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for net-next, async
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 5 this patch: 5
netdev/build_tools success No tools touched, skip
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 8 of 8 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 3 this patch: 3
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 4 this patch: 4
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 68 lines checked
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/contest success net-next-2024-10-17--00-00 (tests: 776)

Commit Message

Marc Kleine-Budde Oct. 16, 2024, 9:51 p.m. UTC
With i.MX8MQ and compatible SoCs, the order of the IRQs in the device
tree is not optimal. The driver expects the first three IRQs to match
their corresponding queue, while the last (fourth) IRQ is used for the
PPS:

- 1st IRQ: "int0": queue0 + other IRQs
- 2nd IRQ: "int1": queue1
- 3rd IRQ: "int2": queue2
- 4th IRQ: "pps": pps

However, the i.MX8MQ and compatible SoCs do not use the
"interrupt-names" property and specify the IRQs in the wrong order:

- 1st IRQ: queue1
- 2nd IRQ: queue2
- 3rd IRQ: queue0 + other IRQs
- 4th IRQ: pps

First rename the quirk from FEC_QUIRK_WAKEUP_FROM_INT2 to
FEC_QUIRK_INT2_IS_MAIN_IRQ, to better reflect it's functionality.

If the FEC_QUIRK_INT2_IS_MAIN_IRQ quirk is active, put the IRQs back
in the correct order, this is done in fec_probe().

Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec.h      | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
 drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Comments

Frank Li Oct. 17, 2024, 2:15 a.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 11:51:55PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> With i.MX8MQ and compatible SoCs, the order of the IRQs in the device
> tree is not optimal. The driver expects the first three IRQs to match
> their corresponding queue, while the last (fourth) IRQ is used for the
> PPS:
>
> - 1st IRQ: "int0": queue0 + other IRQs
> - 2nd IRQ: "int1": queue1
> - 3rd IRQ: "int2": queue2
> - 4th IRQ: "pps": pps
>
> However, the i.MX8MQ and compatible SoCs do not use the
> "interrupt-names" property and specify the IRQs in the wrong order:
>
> - 1st IRQ: queue1
> - 2nd IRQ: queue2
> - 3rd IRQ: queue0 + other IRQs
> - 4th IRQ: pps

why not fix dts?

Frank

>
> First rename the quirk from FEC_QUIRK_WAKEUP_FROM_INT2 to
> FEC_QUIRK_INT2_IS_MAIN_IRQ, to better reflect it's functionality.
>
> If the FEC_QUIRK_INT2_IS_MAIN_IRQ quirk is active, put the IRQs back
> in the correct order, this is done in fec_probe().
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec.h      | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
>  2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec.h
> index 63744a86752540fcede7fc4c29865b2529492526..b0f1a3e28d5c8052be3a8a0fa18303a1df2bb5bd 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec.h
> @@ -504,8 +504,28 @@ struct bufdesc_ex {
>   */
>  #define FEC_QUIRK_DELAYED_CLKS_SUPPORT	(1 << 21)
>
> -/* i.MX8MQ SoC integration mix wakeup interrupt signal into "int2" interrupt line. */
> -#define FEC_QUIRK_WAKEUP_FROM_INT2	(1 << 22)
> +/* With i.MX8MQ and compatible SoCs, the order of the IRQs in the
> + * device tree is not optimal. The driver expects the first three IRQs
> + * to match their corresponding queue, while the last (fourth) IRQ is
> + * used for the PPS:
> + *
> + * - 1st IRQ: "int0": queue0 + other IRQs
> + * - 2nd IRQ: "int1": queue1
> + * - 3rd IRQ: "int2": queue2
> + * - 4th IRQ: "pps": pps
> + *
> + * However, the i.MX8MQ and compatible SoCs do not use the
> + * "interrupt-names" property and specify the IRQs in the wrong order:
> + *
> + * - 1st IRQ: queue1
> + * - 2nd IRQ: queue2
> + * - 3rd IRQ: queue0 + other IRQs
> + * - 4th IRQ: pps
> + *
> + * If the following quirk is active, put the IRQs back in the correct
> + * order, this is done in fec_probe().
> + */
> +#define FEC_QUIRK_DT_IRQ2_IS_MAIN_IRQ	BIT(22)
>
>  /* i.MX6Q adds pm_qos support */
>  #define FEC_QUIRK_HAS_PMQOS			BIT(23)
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> index d948ed9810027d5fabe521dc3af2cf505dacd13e..f124ffe3619d82dc089f8494d33d2398e6f631fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ static const struct fec_devinfo fec_imx8mq_info = {
>  		  FEC_QUIRK_ERR007885 | FEC_QUIRK_BUG_CAPTURE |
>  		  FEC_QUIRK_HAS_RACC | FEC_QUIRK_HAS_COALESCE |
>  		  FEC_QUIRK_CLEAR_SETUP_MII | FEC_QUIRK_HAS_MULTI_QUEUES |
> -		  FEC_QUIRK_HAS_EEE | FEC_QUIRK_WAKEUP_FROM_INT2 |
> +		  FEC_QUIRK_HAS_EEE | FEC_QUIRK_DT_IRQ2_IS_MAIN_IRQ |
>  		  FEC_QUIRK_HAS_MDIO_C45,
>  };
>
> @@ -4260,10 +4260,7 @@ static void fec_enet_get_wakeup_irq(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	struct net_device *ndev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>  	struct fec_enet_private *fep = netdev_priv(ndev);
>
> -	if (fep->quirks & FEC_QUIRK_WAKEUP_FROM_INT2)
> -		fep->wake_irq = fep->irq[2];
> -	else
> -		fep->wake_irq = fep->irq[0];
> +	fep->wake_irq = fep->irq[0];
>  }
>
>  static int fec_enet_init_stop_mode(struct fec_enet_private *fep,
> @@ -4495,10 +4492,17 @@ fec_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		goto failed_init;
>
>  	for (i = 0; i < irq_cnt; i++) {
> -		snprintf(irq_name, sizeof(irq_name), "int%d", i);
> +		int irq_num;
> +
> +		if (fep->quirks & FEC_QUIRK_DT_IRQ2_IS_MAIN_IRQ)
> +			irq_num = (i + irq_cnt - 1) % irq_cnt;
> +		else
> +			irq_num = i;
> +
> +		snprintf(irq_name, sizeof(irq_name), "int%d", irq_num);
>  		irq = platform_get_irq_byname_optional(pdev, irq_name);
>  		if (irq < 0)
> -			irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, i);
> +			irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, irq_num);
>  		if (irq < 0) {
>  			ret = irq;
>  			goto failed_irq;
>
> --
> 2.45.2
>
>
Wei Fang Oct. 17, 2024, 3:09 a.m. UTC | #2
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
> Sent: 2024年10月17日 5:52
> To: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>; Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@nxp.com>;
> Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>; David S. Miller
> <davem@davemloft.net>; Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>; Jakub
> Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>; Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>; Richard
> Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
> Cc: imx@lists.linux.dev; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> kernel@pengutronix.de; Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
> Subject: [PATCH net-next 07/13] net: fec: fec_probe(): update quirk: bring IRQs
> in correct order
> 
> With i.MX8MQ and compatible SoCs, the order of the IRQs in the device
> tree is not optimal. The driver expects the first three IRQs to match
> their corresponding queue, while the last (fourth) IRQ is used for the
> PPS:
> 
> - 1st IRQ: "int0": queue0 + other IRQs
> - 2nd IRQ: "int1": queue1
> - 3rd IRQ: "int2": queue2
> - 4th IRQ: "pps": pps
> 
> However, the i.MX8MQ and compatible SoCs do not use the
> "interrupt-names" property and specify the IRQs in the wrong order:
> 
> - 1st IRQ: queue1
> - 2nd IRQ: queue2
> - 3rd IRQ: queue0 + other IRQs
> - 4th IRQ: pps
> 
> First rename the quirk from FEC_QUIRK_WAKEUP_FROM_INT2 to
> FEC_QUIRK_INT2_IS_MAIN_IRQ, to better reflect it's functionality.
> 
> If the FEC_QUIRK_INT2_IS_MAIN_IRQ quirk is active, put the IRQs back
> in the correct order, this is done in fec_probe().
> 

I think FEC_QUIRK_INT2_IS_MAIN_IRQ or FEC_QUIRK_WAKEUP_FROM_INT2
is *NO* needed anymore. Actually, INT2 is also the main IRQ for i.MX8QM and
its compatible SoCs, but i.MX8QM uses a different solution. I don't know why
there are two different ways of doing it, as I don't know the history. But you can
refer to the solution of i.MX8QM, which I think is more suitable.

See arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8-ss-conn.dtsi, the IRQ 258 is
placed first.

fec1: ethernet@5b040000 {
		reg = <0x5b040000 0x10000>;
		interrupts = <GIC_SPI 258 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
			     <GIC_SPI 256 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
			     <GIC_SPI 257 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
			     <GIC_SPI 259 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;

> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec.h      | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
>  2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec.h
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec.h
> index
> 63744a86752540fcede7fc4c29865b2529492526..b0f1a3e28d5c8052be3a8a0
> fa18303a1df2bb5bd 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec.h
> @@ -504,8 +504,28 @@ struct bufdesc_ex {
>   */
>  #define FEC_QUIRK_DELAYED_CLKS_SUPPORT	(1 << 21)
> 
> -/* i.MX8MQ SoC integration mix wakeup interrupt signal into "int2" interrupt
> line. */
> -#define FEC_QUIRK_WAKEUP_FROM_INT2	(1 << 22)
> +/* With i.MX8MQ and compatible SoCs, the order of the IRQs in the
> + * device tree is not optimal. The driver expects the first three IRQs
> + * to match their corresponding queue, while the last (fourth) IRQ is
> + * used for the PPS:
> + *
> + * - 1st IRQ: "int0": queue0 + other IRQs
> + * - 2nd IRQ: "int1": queue1
> + * - 3rd IRQ: "int2": queue2
> + * - 4th IRQ: "pps": pps
> + *
> + * However, the i.MX8MQ and compatible SoCs do not use the
> + * "interrupt-names" property and specify the IRQs in the wrong order:
> + *
> + * - 1st IRQ: queue1
> + * - 2nd IRQ: queue2
> + * - 3rd IRQ: queue0 + other IRQs
> + * - 4th IRQ: pps
> + *
> + * If the following quirk is active, put the IRQs back in the correct
> + * order, this is done in fec_probe().
> + */
> +#define FEC_QUIRK_DT_IRQ2_IS_MAIN_IRQ	BIT(22)
> 
>  /* i.MX6Q adds pm_qos support */
>  #define FEC_QUIRK_HAS_PMQOS			BIT(23)
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> index
> d948ed9810027d5fabe521dc3af2cf505dacd13e..f124ffe3619d82dc089f8494
> d33d2398e6f631fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ static const struct fec_devinfo fec_imx8mq_info = {
>  		  FEC_QUIRK_ERR007885 | FEC_QUIRK_BUG_CAPTURE |
>  		  FEC_QUIRK_HAS_RACC | FEC_QUIRK_HAS_COALESCE |
>  		  FEC_QUIRK_CLEAR_SETUP_MII | FEC_QUIRK_HAS_MULTI_QUEUES
> |
> -		  FEC_QUIRK_HAS_EEE | FEC_QUIRK_WAKEUP_FROM_INT2 |
> +		  FEC_QUIRK_HAS_EEE | FEC_QUIRK_DT_IRQ2_IS_MAIN_IRQ |
>  		  FEC_QUIRK_HAS_MDIO_C45,
>  };
> 
> @@ -4260,10 +4260,7 @@ static void fec_enet_get_wakeup_irq(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
>  	struct net_device *ndev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>  	struct fec_enet_private *fep = netdev_priv(ndev);
> 
> -	if (fep->quirks & FEC_QUIRK_WAKEUP_FROM_INT2)
> -		fep->wake_irq = fep->irq[2];
> -	else
> -		fep->wake_irq = fep->irq[0];
> +	fep->wake_irq = fep->irq[0];
>  }
> 
>  static int fec_enet_init_stop_mode(struct fec_enet_private *fep,
> @@ -4495,10 +4492,17 @@ fec_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		goto failed_init;
> 
>  	for (i = 0; i < irq_cnt; i++) {
> -		snprintf(irq_name, sizeof(irq_name), "int%d", i);
> +		int irq_num;
> +
> +		if (fep->quirks & FEC_QUIRK_DT_IRQ2_IS_MAIN_IRQ)
> +			irq_num = (i + irq_cnt - 1) % irq_cnt;
> +		else
> +			irq_num = i;
> +
> +		snprintf(irq_name, sizeof(irq_name), "int%d", irq_num);
>  		irq = platform_get_irq_byname_optional(pdev, irq_name);
>  		if (irq < 0)
> -			irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, i);
> +			irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, irq_num);
>  		if (irq < 0) {
>  			ret = irq;
>  			goto failed_irq;
> 
> --
> 2.45.2
>
Marc Kleine-Budde Oct. 17, 2024, 6:13 a.m. UTC | #3
On 16.10.2024 22:15:43, Frank Li wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 11:51:55PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> > With i.MX8MQ and compatible SoCs, the order of the IRQs in the device
> > tree is not optimal. The driver expects the first three IRQs to match
> > their corresponding queue, while the last (fourth) IRQ is used for the
> > PPS:
> >
> > - 1st IRQ: "int0": queue0 + other IRQs
> > - 2nd IRQ: "int1": queue1
> > - 3rd IRQ: "int2": queue2
> > - 4th IRQ: "pps": pps
> >
> > However, the i.MX8MQ and compatible SoCs do not use the
> > "interrupt-names" property and specify the IRQs in the wrong order:
> >
> > - 1st IRQ: queue1
> > - 2nd IRQ: queue2
> > - 3rd IRQ: queue0 + other IRQs
> > - 4th IRQ: pps
> 
> why not fix dts?

Because of compatibility. You could update the fec driver and try to
detect if the IRQs in the DTS are in the "correct" order, but the new
DTS will be incompatible with the old driver.

I'm working on a patch series that updates the fec driver to "per queue
IRQ and NAPI" handling. For this approach it's crucial that the IRQs
match the queue number.

regards,
Marc
Marc Kleine-Budde Oct. 17, 2024, 6:16 a.m. UTC | #4
On 17.10.2024 03:09:15, Wei Fang wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
> > Sent: 2024年10月17日 5:52
> > To: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>; Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@nxp.com>;
> > Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>; David S. Miller
> > <davem@davemloft.net>; Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>; Jakub
> > Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>; Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>; Richard
> > Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
> > Cc: imx@lists.linux.dev; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> > kernel@pengutronix.de; Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
> > Subject: [PATCH net-next 07/13] net: fec: fec_probe(): update quirk: bring IRQs
> > in correct order
> > 
> > With i.MX8MQ and compatible SoCs, the order of the IRQs in the device
> > tree is not optimal. The driver expects the first three IRQs to match
> > their corresponding queue, while the last (fourth) IRQ is used for the
> > PPS:
> > 
> > - 1st IRQ: "int0": queue0 + other IRQs
> > - 2nd IRQ: "int1": queue1
> > - 3rd IRQ: "int2": queue2
> > - 4th IRQ: "pps": pps
> > 
> > However, the i.MX8MQ and compatible SoCs do not use the
> > "interrupt-names" property and specify the IRQs in the wrong order:
> > 
> > - 1st IRQ: queue1
> > - 2nd IRQ: queue2
> > - 3rd IRQ: queue0 + other IRQs
> > - 4th IRQ: pps
> > 
> > First rename the quirk from FEC_QUIRK_WAKEUP_FROM_INT2 to
> > FEC_QUIRK_INT2_IS_MAIN_IRQ, to better reflect it's functionality.
> > 
> > If the FEC_QUIRK_INT2_IS_MAIN_IRQ quirk is active, put the IRQs back
> > in the correct order, this is done in fec_probe().
> > 
> 
> I think FEC_QUIRK_INT2_IS_MAIN_IRQ or FEC_QUIRK_WAKEUP_FROM_INT2
> is *NO* needed anymore. Actually, INT2 is also the main IRQ for i.MX8QM and
> its compatible SoCs, but i.MX8QM uses a different solution. I don't know why
> there are two different ways of doing it, as I don't know the history. But you can
> refer to the solution of i.MX8QM, which I think is more suitable.
> 
> See arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8-ss-conn.dtsi, the IRQ 258 is
> placed first.

Yes, that is IMHO the correct description of the IP core, but the
i.MX8M/N/Q DTS have the wrong order of IRQs. And for compatibility
reasons (fixed DTS with old driver) it's IMHO not possible to change the
DTS.

> fec1: ethernet@5b040000 {
> 		reg = <0x5b040000 0x10000>;
> 		interrupts = <GIC_SPI 258 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> 			     <GIC_SPI 256 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> 			     <GIC_SPI 257 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> 			     <GIC_SPI 259 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;

regards,
Marc
Wei Fang Oct. 17, 2024, 7:43 a.m. UTC | #5
> > > Subject: [PATCH net-next 07/13] net: fec: fec_probe(): update quirk: bring
> IRQs
> > > in correct order
> > >
> > > With i.MX8MQ and compatible SoCs, the order of the IRQs in the device
> > > tree is not optimal. The driver expects the first three IRQs to match
> > > their corresponding queue, while the last (fourth) IRQ is used for the
> > > PPS:
> > >
> > > - 1st IRQ: "int0": queue0 + other IRQs
> > > - 2nd IRQ: "int1": queue1
> > > - 3rd IRQ: "int2": queue2
> > > - 4th IRQ: "pps": pps
> > >
> > > However, the i.MX8MQ and compatible SoCs do not use the
> > > "interrupt-names" property and specify the IRQs in the wrong order:
> > >
> > > - 1st IRQ: queue1
> > > - 2nd IRQ: queue2
> > > - 3rd IRQ: queue0 + other IRQs
> > > - 4th IRQ: pps
> > >
> > > First rename the quirk from FEC_QUIRK_WAKEUP_FROM_INT2 to
> > > FEC_QUIRK_INT2_IS_MAIN_IRQ, to better reflect it's functionality.
> > >
> > > If the FEC_QUIRK_INT2_IS_MAIN_IRQ quirk is active, put the IRQs back
> > > in the correct order, this is done in fec_probe().
> > >
> >
> > I think FEC_QUIRK_INT2_IS_MAIN_IRQ or FEC_QUIRK_WAKEUP_FROM_INT2
> > is *NO* needed anymore. Actually, INT2 is also the main IRQ for i.MX8QM
> and
> > its compatible SoCs, but i.MX8QM uses a different solution. I don't know
> why
> > there are two different ways of doing it, as I don't know the history. But you
> can
> > refer to the solution of i.MX8QM, which I think is more suitable.
> >
> > See arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8-ss-conn.dtsi, the IRQ 258 is
> > placed first.
> 
> Yes, that is IMHO the correct description of the IP core, but the
> i.MX8M/N/Q DTS have the wrong order of IRQs. And for compatibility
> reasons (fixed DTS with old driver) it's IMHO not possible to change the
> DTS.
> 

I don't think it is a correct behavior for old drivers to use new DTBs or new
drivers to use old DTBs. Maybe you are correct, Frank also asked the same
question, let's see how Frank responded.

> > fec1: ethernet@5b040000 {
> > 		reg = <0x5b040000 0x10000>;
> > 		interrupts = <GIC_SPI 258 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > 			     <GIC_SPI 256 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > 			     <GIC_SPI 257 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > 			     <GIC_SPI 259 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>
Marc Kleine-Budde Oct. 17, 2024, 10:21 a.m. UTC | #6
On 17.10.2024 07:43:55, Wei Fang wrote:
> > > > Subject: [PATCH net-next 07/13] net: fec: fec_probe(): update quirk: bring
> > IRQs
> > > > in correct order
> > > >
> > > > With i.MX8MQ and compatible SoCs, the order of the IRQs in the device
> > > > tree is not optimal. The driver expects the first three IRQs to match
> > > > their corresponding queue, while the last (fourth) IRQ is used for the
> > > > PPS:
> > > >
> > > > - 1st IRQ: "int0": queue0 + other IRQs
> > > > - 2nd IRQ: "int1": queue1
> > > > - 3rd IRQ: "int2": queue2
> > > > - 4th IRQ: "pps": pps
> > > >
> > > > However, the i.MX8MQ and compatible SoCs do not use the
> > > > "interrupt-names" property and specify the IRQs in the wrong order:
> > > >
> > > > - 1st IRQ: queue1
> > > > - 2nd IRQ: queue2
> > > > - 3rd IRQ: queue0 + other IRQs
> > > > - 4th IRQ: pps
> > > >
> > > > First rename the quirk from FEC_QUIRK_WAKEUP_FROM_INT2 to
> > > > FEC_QUIRK_INT2_IS_MAIN_IRQ, to better reflect it's functionality.
> > > >
> > > > If the FEC_QUIRK_INT2_IS_MAIN_IRQ quirk is active, put the IRQs back
> > > > in the correct order, this is done in fec_probe().
> > > >
> > >
> > > I think FEC_QUIRK_INT2_IS_MAIN_IRQ or FEC_QUIRK_WAKEUP_FROM_INT2
> > > is *NO* needed anymore. Actually, INT2 is also the main IRQ for i.MX8QM
> > and
> > > its compatible SoCs, but i.MX8QM uses a different solution. I don't know
> > why
> > > there are two different ways of doing it, as I don't know the history. But you
> > can
> > > refer to the solution of i.MX8QM, which I think is more suitable.
> > >
> > > See arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8-ss-conn.dtsi, the IRQ 258 is
> > > placed first.
> > 
> > Yes, that is IMHO the correct description of the IP core, but the
> > i.MX8M/N/Q DTS have the wrong order of IRQs. And for compatibility
> > reasons (fixed DTS with old driver) it's IMHO not possible to change the
> > DTS.
> > 
> 
> I don't think it is a correct behavior for old drivers to use new DTBs or new
> drivers to use old DTBs. Maybe you are correct, Frank also asked the same
> question, let's see how Frank responded.

DTBs should be considered stable ABI.

regards,
Marc
Frank Li Oct. 17, 2024, 2:03 p.m. UTC | #7
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 12:21:10PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 17.10.2024 07:43:55, Wei Fang wrote:
> > > > > Subject: [PATCH net-next 07/13] net: fec: fec_probe(): update quirk: bring
> > > IRQs
> > > > > in correct order
> > > > >
> > > > > With i.MX8MQ and compatible SoCs, the order of the IRQs in the device
> > > > > tree is not optimal. The driver expects the first three IRQs to match
> > > > > their corresponding queue, while the last (fourth) IRQ is used for the
> > > > > PPS:
> > > > >
> > > > > - 1st IRQ: "int0": queue0 + other IRQs
> > > > > - 2nd IRQ: "int1": queue1
> > > > > - 3rd IRQ: "int2": queue2
> > > > > - 4th IRQ: "pps": pps
> > > > >
> > > > > However, the i.MX8MQ and compatible SoCs do not use the
> > > > > "interrupt-names" property and specify the IRQs in the wrong order:
> > > > >
> > > > > - 1st IRQ: queue1
> > > > > - 2nd IRQ: queue2
> > > > > - 3rd IRQ: queue0 + other IRQs
> > > > > - 4th IRQ: pps
> > > > >
> > > > > First rename the quirk from FEC_QUIRK_WAKEUP_FROM_INT2 to
> > > > > FEC_QUIRK_INT2_IS_MAIN_IRQ, to better reflect it's functionality.
> > > > >
> > > > > If the FEC_QUIRK_INT2_IS_MAIN_IRQ quirk is active, put the IRQs back
> > > > > in the correct order, this is done in fec_probe().
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I think FEC_QUIRK_INT2_IS_MAIN_IRQ or FEC_QUIRK_WAKEUP_FROM_INT2
> > > > is *NO* needed anymore. Actually, INT2 is also the main IRQ for i.MX8QM
> > > and
> > > > its compatible SoCs, but i.MX8QM uses a different solution. I don't know
> > > why
> > > > there are two different ways of doing it, as I don't know the history. But you
> > > can
> > > > refer to the solution of i.MX8QM, which I think is more suitable.
> > > >
> > > > See arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8-ss-conn.dtsi, the IRQ 258 is
> > > > placed first.
> > >
> > > Yes, that is IMHO the correct description of the IP core, but the
> > > i.MX8M/N/Q DTS have the wrong order of IRQs. And for compatibility
> > > reasons (fixed DTS with old driver) it's IMHO not possible to change the
> > > DTS.
> > >
> >
> > I don't think it is a correct behavior for old drivers to use new DTBs or new
> > drivers to use old DTBs. Maybe you are correct, Frank also asked the same
> > question, let's see how Frank responded.
>
> DTBs should be considered stable ABI.
>

ABI defined at binding doc.
  interrupt-names:
    oneOf:
      - items:
          - const: int0
      - items:
          - const: int0
          - const: pps
      - items:
          - const: int0
          - const: int1
          - const: int2
      - items:
          - const: int0
          - const: int1
          - const: int2
          - const: pps

DTB should align binding doc. There are not 'descriptions' at 'interrupt',
which should match 'interrupt-names'. So IMX8MP dts have not match ABI,
which defined by binding doc. So it is DTS implement wrong.

Frank

> regards,
> Marc
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde          |
> Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de |
> Vertretung Nürnberg              | Phone: +49-5121-206917-129 |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-9   |
Marc Kleine-Budde Oct. 17, 2024, 2:21 p.m. UTC | #8
On 17.10.2024 10:03:51, Frank Li wrote:
> > > > Yes, that is IMHO the correct description of the IP core, but the
> > > > i.MX8M/N/Q DTS have the wrong order of IRQs. And for compatibility
> > > > reasons (fixed DTS with old driver) it's IMHO not possible to change the
> > > > DTS.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I don't think it is a correct behavior for old drivers to use new DTBs or new
> > > drivers to use old DTBs. Maybe you are correct, Frank also asked the same
> > > question, let's see how Frank responded.
> >
> > DTBs should be considered stable ABI.
> >
> 
> ABI defined at binding doc.
>   interrupt-names:
>     oneOf:
>       - items:
>           - const: int0
>       - items:
>           - const: int0
>           - const: pps
>       - items:
>           - const: int0
>           - const: int1
>           - const: int2
>       - items:
>           - const: int0
>           - const: int1
>           - const: int2
>           - const: pps
> 
> DTB should align binding doc. There are not 'descriptions' at 'interrupt',
> which should match 'interrupt-names'. So IMX8MP dts have not match ABI,
> which defined by binding doc. So it is DTS implement wrong.

I follow your conclusion. But keep in mind, fixing the DTB would break
compatibility. The wrong DTS looks like this:

- const: int1
- const: int2
- const: int0
- const: pps

Currently we have broken DTS on the i.MX8M* and the
FEC_QUIRK_WAKEUP_FROM_INT2 that "fixes" this.

This patch uses this quirk to correct the IRQ <-> queue assignment in
the driver.

Marc
Frank Li Oct. 17, 2024, 3:30 p.m. UTC | #9
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 04:21:33PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 17.10.2024 10:03:51, Frank Li wrote:
> > > > > Yes, that is IMHO the correct description of the IP core, but the
> > > > > i.MX8M/N/Q DTS have the wrong order of IRQs. And for compatibility
> > > > > reasons (fixed DTS with old driver) it's IMHO not possible to change the
> > > > > DTS.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I don't think it is a correct behavior for old drivers to use new DTBs or new
> > > > drivers to use old DTBs. Maybe you are correct, Frank also asked the same
> > > > question, let's see how Frank responded.
> > >
> > > DTBs should be considered stable ABI.
> > >
> >
> > ABI defined at binding doc.
> >   interrupt-names:
> >     oneOf:
> >       - items:
> >           - const: int0
> >       - items:
> >           - const: int0
> >           - const: pps
> >       - items:
> >           - const: int0
> >           - const: int1
> >           - const: int2
> >       - items:
> >           - const: int0
> >           - const: int1
> >           - const: int2
> >           - const: pps
> >
> > DTB should align binding doc. There are not 'descriptions' at 'interrupt',
> > which should match 'interrupt-names'. So IMX8MP dts have not match ABI,
> > which defined by binding doc. So it is DTS implement wrong.
>
> I follow your conclusion. But keep in mind, fixing the DTB would break
> compatibility. The wrong DTS looks like this:
>
> - const: int1
> - const: int2
> - const: int0
> - const: pps
>
> Currently we have broken DTS on the i.MX8M* and the
> FEC_QUIRK_WAKEUP_FROM_INT2 that "fixes" this.
>
> This patch uses this quirk to correct the IRQ <-> queue assignment in
> the driver.

This current code

for (i = 0; i < irq_cnt; i++) {
                snprintf(irq_name, sizeof(irq_name), "int%d", i);
                irq = platform_get_irq_byname_optional(pdev, irq_name);
		      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You just need add interrupt-names at imx8mp dts and reorder it to pass
DTB check.

                if (irq < 0)
                        irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, i);
                if (irq < 0) {
                        ret = irq;
                        goto failed_irq;
                }
                ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, fec_enet_interrupt,
                                       0, pdev->name, ndev);
                if (ret)
                        goto failed_irq;

                fep->irq[i] = irq;
        }

All irq handle by the same fec_enet_interrupt().  Change dts irq orders
doesn't broken compatiblity.

"pre-equeue" irq is new features. You can enable this feature only
when "interrupt-names" exist in future.

>
> Marc
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde          |
> Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de |
> Vertretung Nürnberg              | Phone: +49-5121-206917-129 |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-9   |
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec.h
index 63744a86752540fcede7fc4c29865b2529492526..b0f1a3e28d5c8052be3a8a0fa18303a1df2bb5bd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec.h
@@ -504,8 +504,28 @@  struct bufdesc_ex {
  */
 #define FEC_QUIRK_DELAYED_CLKS_SUPPORT	(1 << 21)
 
-/* i.MX8MQ SoC integration mix wakeup interrupt signal into "int2" interrupt line. */
-#define FEC_QUIRK_WAKEUP_FROM_INT2	(1 << 22)
+/* With i.MX8MQ and compatible SoCs, the order of the IRQs in the
+ * device tree is not optimal. The driver expects the first three IRQs
+ * to match their corresponding queue, while the last (fourth) IRQ is
+ * used for the PPS:
+ *
+ * - 1st IRQ: "int0": queue0 + other IRQs
+ * - 2nd IRQ: "int1": queue1
+ * - 3rd IRQ: "int2": queue2
+ * - 4th IRQ: "pps": pps
+ *
+ * However, the i.MX8MQ and compatible SoCs do not use the
+ * "interrupt-names" property and specify the IRQs in the wrong order:
+ *
+ * - 1st IRQ: queue1
+ * - 2nd IRQ: queue2
+ * - 3rd IRQ: queue0 + other IRQs
+ * - 4th IRQ: pps
+ *
+ * If the following quirk is active, put the IRQs back in the correct
+ * order, this is done in fec_probe().
+ */
+#define FEC_QUIRK_DT_IRQ2_IS_MAIN_IRQ	BIT(22)
 
 /* i.MX6Q adds pm_qos support */
 #define FEC_QUIRK_HAS_PMQOS			BIT(23)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
index d948ed9810027d5fabe521dc3af2cf505dacd13e..f124ffe3619d82dc089f8494d33d2398e6f631fb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@  static const struct fec_devinfo fec_imx8mq_info = {
 		  FEC_QUIRK_ERR007885 | FEC_QUIRK_BUG_CAPTURE |
 		  FEC_QUIRK_HAS_RACC | FEC_QUIRK_HAS_COALESCE |
 		  FEC_QUIRK_CLEAR_SETUP_MII | FEC_QUIRK_HAS_MULTI_QUEUES |
-		  FEC_QUIRK_HAS_EEE | FEC_QUIRK_WAKEUP_FROM_INT2 |
+		  FEC_QUIRK_HAS_EEE | FEC_QUIRK_DT_IRQ2_IS_MAIN_IRQ |
 		  FEC_QUIRK_HAS_MDIO_C45,
 };
 
@@ -4260,10 +4260,7 @@  static void fec_enet_get_wakeup_irq(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct net_device *ndev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
 	struct fec_enet_private *fep = netdev_priv(ndev);
 
-	if (fep->quirks & FEC_QUIRK_WAKEUP_FROM_INT2)
-		fep->wake_irq = fep->irq[2];
-	else
-		fep->wake_irq = fep->irq[0];
+	fep->wake_irq = fep->irq[0];
 }
 
 static int fec_enet_init_stop_mode(struct fec_enet_private *fep,
@@ -4495,10 +4492,17 @@  fec_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		goto failed_init;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < irq_cnt; i++) {
-		snprintf(irq_name, sizeof(irq_name), "int%d", i);
+		int irq_num;
+
+		if (fep->quirks & FEC_QUIRK_DT_IRQ2_IS_MAIN_IRQ)
+			irq_num = (i + irq_cnt - 1) % irq_cnt;
+		else
+			irq_num = i;
+
+		snprintf(irq_name, sizeof(irq_name), "int%d", irq_num);
 		irq = platform_get_irq_byname_optional(pdev, irq_name);
 		if (irq < 0)
-			irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, i);
+			irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, irq_num);
 		if (irq < 0) {
 			ret = irq;
 			goto failed_irq;