Message ID | 20241029202758.2764535-1-lihuafei1@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [v3] drm/amdgpu: Fix the memory allocation issue in amdgpu_discovery_get_nps_info() | expand |
On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 8:53 AM Li Huafei <lihuafei1@huawei.com> wrote: > > Fix two issues with memory allocation in amdgpu_discovery_get_nps_info() > for mem_ranges: > > - Add a check for allocation failure to avoid dereferencing a null > pointer. > > - As suggested by Christophe, use kvcalloc() for memory allocation, > which checks for multiplication overflow. > > Additionally, assign the output parameters nps_type and range_cnt after > the kvcalloc() call to prevent modifying the output parameters in case > of an error return. > > Fixes: b194d21b9bcc ("drm/amdgpu: Use NPS ranges from discovery table") > Suggested-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> > Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com> > Signed-off-by: Li Huafei <lihuafei1@huawei.com> > --- > Changes in v3: > - As suggested by Christophe, replace kvzalloc() with kvcalloc() > - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20241029101839.2605713-1-lihuafei1@huawei.com/ > > Changes in v2: > - kvzalloc() call uses 'nps_info->v1.count' instead of '*range_cnt' > - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20241028215933.2599271-1-lihuafei1@huawei.com/ Applied. Thanks! Alex > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c | 8 +++++--- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c > index 4bd61c169ca8..620090f092ab 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c > @@ -1757,11 +1757,13 @@ int amdgpu_discovery_get_nps_info(struct amdgpu_device *adev, > > switch (le16_to_cpu(nps_info->v1.header.version_major)) { > case 1: > + mem_ranges = kvcalloc(nps_info->v1.count, > + sizeof(struct amdgpu_gmc_memrange), > + GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!mem_ranges) > + return -ENOMEM; > *nps_type = nps_info->v1.nps_type; > *range_cnt = nps_info->v1.count; > - mem_ranges = kvzalloc( > - *range_cnt * sizeof(struct amdgpu_gmc_memrange), > - GFP_KERNEL); > for (i = 0; i < *range_cnt; i++) { > mem_ranges[i].base_address = > nps_info->v1.instance_info[i].base_address; > -- > 2.25.1 >
… > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c > @@ -1757,11 +1757,13 @@ int amdgpu_discovery_get_nps_info(struct amdgpu_device *adev, > > switch (le16_to_cpu(nps_info->v1.header.version_major)) { > case 1: > + mem_ranges = kvcalloc(nps_info->v1.count, > + sizeof(struct amdgpu_gmc_memrange), > + GFP_KERNEL); … Can the specification “sizeof(*mem_ranges)” be more appropriate here? https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst?h=v6.12-rc5#n941 Regards, Markus
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c index 4bd61c169ca8..620090f092ab 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c @@ -1757,11 +1757,13 @@ int amdgpu_discovery_get_nps_info(struct amdgpu_device *adev, switch (le16_to_cpu(nps_info->v1.header.version_major)) { case 1: + mem_ranges = kvcalloc(nps_info->v1.count, + sizeof(struct amdgpu_gmc_memrange), + GFP_KERNEL); + if (!mem_ranges) + return -ENOMEM; *nps_type = nps_info->v1.nps_type; *range_cnt = nps_info->v1.count; - mem_ranges = kvzalloc( - *range_cnt * sizeof(struct amdgpu_gmc_memrange), - GFP_KERNEL); for (i = 0; i < *range_cnt; i++) { mem_ranges[i].base_address = nps_info->v1.instance_info[i].base_address;