Message ID | 20241030143418.410406-1-raag.jadav@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Implement Wa_14022698537 | expand |
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024, Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com> wrote: > This series implements Wa_14022698537 for DG2 along with its prerequisites > in i915. Now that we have a common pciids.h in place, this can be extended > to xe as well. Detailed description in commit message. Okay, so this bumps the requirements during development, but where's the implementation for xe? What's it going to look like? BR, Jani. > > v1: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/139628/ > > v2: Introduce DG2_WA subplatform for workaround (Jani) > Fix Wa_ID and include it in subject (Badal) > Rephrase commit message (Jani) > Move CPU whitelist to intel_wa_cpu.c > > v3: Rework subplatform naming (Jani) > Move CPU file out of gt directory (Riana) > Rephrase CPU file description (Jani) > Add kernel doc, re-order macro (Riana) > Move workaround to i915_pcode_init() (Badal, Anshuman) > > Raag Jadav (4): > drm/intel/pciids: Refactor DG2 PCI IDs into segment ranges > drm/i915/dg2: Introduce DG2_D subplatform > drm/i915: Introduce intel_cpu_info.c for CPU IDs > drm/i915/dg2: Implement Wa_14022698537 > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c | 15 +++++++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 + > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 1 + > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cpu_info.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cpu_info.h | 13 ++++++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c | 9 ++++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h | 5 ++- > include/drm/intel/pciids.h | 55 ++++++++++++++++++------ > 9 files changed, 129 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cpu_info.c > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cpu_info.h
On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 08:40:50PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 30 Oct 2024, Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com> wrote: > > This series implements Wa_14022698537 for DG2 along with its prerequisites > > in i915. Now that we have a common pciids.h in place, this can be extended > > to xe as well. Detailed description in commit message. > > Okay, so this bumps the requirements during development, but where's the > implementation for xe? What's it going to look like? The requirement is only for i915. What I mean here is, if the requirement arises for xe in the future, this *can* be implemented without significant refactoring now that we have a common pciids.h in place. I know it's not the best choice of words but I thought you wouldn't mind :) Raag