Message ID | cover.1730313494.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | iommufd: Add vIOMMU infrastructure (Part-2: vDEVICE) | expand |
On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 at 05:36, Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com> wrote: > > Following the previous vIOMMU series, this adds another vDEVICE structure, > representing the association from an iommufd_device to an iommufd_viommu. > This gives the whole architecture a new "v" layer: > _______________________________________________________________________ > | iommufd (with vIOMMU/vDEVICE) | > | _____________ _____________ | > | | | | | | > | |----------------| vIOMMU |<---| vDEVICE |<------| | > | | | | |_____________| | | > | | ______ | | _____________ ___|____ | > | | | | | | | | | | | > | | | IOAS |<---|(HWPT_PAGING)|<---| HWPT_NESTED |<--| DEVICE | | > | | |______| |_____________| |_____________| |________| | > |______|________|______________|__________________|_______________|_____| > | | | | | > ______v_____ | ______v_____ ______v_____ ___v__ > | struct | | PFN | (paging) | | (nested) | |struct| > |iommu_device| |------>|iommu_domain|<----|iommu_domain|<----|device| > |____________| storage|____________| |____________| |______| > > This vDEVICE object is used to collect and store all vIOMMU-related device > information/attributes in a VM. As an initial series for vDEVICE, add only > the virt_id to the vDEVICE, which is a vIOMMU specific device ID in a VM: > e.g. vSID of ARM SMMUv3, vDeviceID of AMD IOMMU, and vRID of Intel VT-d to > a Context Table. This virt_id helps IOMMU drivers to link the vID to a pID > of the device against the physical IOMMU instance. This is essential for a > vIOMMU-based invalidation, where the request contains a device's vID for a > device cache flush, e.g. ATC invalidation. > > Therefore, with this vDEVICE object, support a vIOMMU-based invalidation, > by reusing IOMMUFD_CMD_HWPT_INVALIDATE for a vIOMMU object to flush cache > with a given driver data. > > As for the implementation of the series, add driver support in ARM SMMUv3 > for a real world use case. > > This series is on Github: > https://github.com/nicolinc/iommufd/commits/iommufd_viommu_p2-v6 > (QEMU branch for testing will be provided in Jason's nesting series) Thanks Nico I tested on aarch64, functions are OK. But with some hacks https://github.com/Linaro/linux-kernel-uadk/commit/22f47d6f3a34a0867a187473bd5ba0e0ee3395d4 Thanks
On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 02:28:12PM +0800, Zhangfei Gao wrote: > > As for the implementation of the series, add driver support in ARM SMMUv3 > > for a real world use case. > > > > This series is on Github: > > https://github.com/nicolinc/iommufd/commits/iommufd_viommu_p2-v6 > > (QEMU branch for testing will be provided in Jason's nesting series) > > Thanks Nico > > I tested on aarch64, functions are OK. > > But with some hacks > https://github.com/Linaro/linux-kernel-uadk/commit/22f47d6f3a34a0867a187473bd5ba0e0ee3395d4 Hmm, it seems like we should permit IOMMU_HWPT_FAULT_ID_VALID domain creation on ARM? Jason
On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 02:28:12PM +0800, Zhangfei Gao wrote: > On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 at 05:36, Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com> wrote: > > > > Following the previous vIOMMU series, this adds another vDEVICE structure, > > representing the association from an iommufd_device to an iommufd_viommu. > > This gives the whole architecture a new "v" layer: > > _______________________________________________________________________ > > | iommufd (with vIOMMU/vDEVICE) | > > | _____________ _____________ | > > | | | | | | > > | |----------------| vIOMMU |<---| vDEVICE |<------| | > > | | | | |_____________| | | > > | | ______ | | _____________ ___|____ | > > | | | | | | | | | | | > > | | | IOAS |<---|(HWPT_PAGING)|<---| HWPT_NESTED |<--| DEVICE | | > > | | |______| |_____________| |_____________| |________| | > > |______|________|______________|__________________|_______________|_____| > > | | | | | > > ______v_____ | ______v_____ ______v_____ ___v__ > > | struct | | PFN | (paging) | | (nested) | |struct| > > |iommu_device| |------>|iommu_domain|<----|iommu_domain|<----|device| > > |____________| storage|____________| |____________| |______| > > > > This vDEVICE object is used to collect and store all vIOMMU-related device > > information/attributes in a VM. As an initial series for vDEVICE, add only > > the virt_id to the vDEVICE, which is a vIOMMU specific device ID in a VM: > > e.g. vSID of ARM SMMUv3, vDeviceID of AMD IOMMU, and vRID of Intel VT-d to > > a Context Table. This virt_id helps IOMMU drivers to link the vID to a pID > > of the device against the physical IOMMU instance. This is essential for a > > vIOMMU-based invalidation, where the request contains a device's vID for a > > device cache flush, e.g. ATC invalidation. > > > > Therefore, with this vDEVICE object, support a vIOMMU-based invalidation, > > by reusing IOMMUFD_CMD_HWPT_INVALIDATE for a vIOMMU object to flush cache > > with a given driver data. > > > > As for the implementation of the series, add driver support in ARM SMMUv3 > > for a real world use case. > > > > This series is on Github: > > https://github.com/nicolinc/iommufd/commits/iommufd_viommu_p2-v6 > > (QEMU branch for testing will be provided in Jason's nesting series) > > Thanks Nico > > I tested on aarch64, functions are OK. > > But with some hacks > https://github.com/Linaro/linux-kernel-uadk/commit/22f47d6f3a34a0867a187473bd5ba0e0ee3395d4 Though we will have some small changes to this two series (and possibly a small change to SMMUv3 driver too for that flags in the hacks), would you mind giving this two series a Tested-by? Thanks! Nicolin
On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 08:59:37AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 02:28:12PM +0800, Zhangfei Gao wrote: > > > > As for the implementation of the series, add driver support in ARM SMMUv3 > > > for a real world use case. > > > > > > This series is on Github: > > > https://github.com/nicolinc/iommufd/commits/iommufd_viommu_p2-v6 > > > (QEMU branch for testing will be provided in Jason's nesting series) > > > > Thanks Nico > > > > I tested on aarch64, functions are OK. > > > > But with some hacks > > https://github.com/Linaro/linux-kernel-uadk/commit/22f47d6f3a34a0867a187473bd5ba0e0ee3395d4 > > Hmm, it seems like we should permit IOMMU_HWPT_FAULT_ID_VALID domain > creation on ARM? +1, since we proved PRI could work :) Thanks Nicolin