Message ID | 20241104093609.156059-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | gpio: Get rid of deprecated GPIOF_ACTIVE_LOW | expand |
On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 11:34:18AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > This series targets the deprecated GPIOF_ACTIVE_LOW as only a few users > left. Convert those users to call modern APIs and drop this legacy piece > from the source tree. > > The idea is to route this via GPIO tree, please Ack. Thank you for Acks, folks! Dominik, is it possible to get yours or are you inactive nowadays (I saw last mention of your name ca. 2023). Bart, we have all Acks except pcmcia (see also above), and the change is the same all over the places, do you think it's okay to apply if Dominik won't respond for a few days?
On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 12:15 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 11:34:18AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > This series targets the deprecated GPIOF_ACTIVE_LOW as only a few users > > left. Convert those users to call modern APIs and drop this legacy piece > > from the source tree. > > > > The idea is to route this via GPIO tree, please Ack. > > Thank you for Acks, folks! > > Dominik, is it possible to get yours or are you inactive nowadays (I saw > last mention of your name ca. 2023). > > Bart, we have all Acks except pcmcia (see also above), and the change is > the same all over the places, do you think it's okay to apply if Dominik > won't respond for a few days? > If we don't get an ack until Friday, I will take it as is. Bart