| Message ID | 20241107185746.138146-1-jic23@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | iio: Move __private marking before struct element priv in struct iio_dev | expand |
On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 06:57:46PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> > > This is to avoid tripping up kernel-doc which filters it out before > but not after the name. > > Fixes: > ./include/linux/iio/iio.h:628: warning: Function parameter or struct member '__private' not described in 'iio_dev' > ./include/linux/iio/iio.h:628: warning: Excess struct member 'priv' description in 'iio_dev' ... > - void *priv __private; > + void __private *priv; > }; This is still inconsistent from the position perspective (while may still work). I specifically placed it there, otherwise what you need is to have void * __private priv; to be fully consistent. That said, either you need to carefully reindent all the affected members, or fix the kernel-doc, or both.
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 10:41:02 +0200 Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 06:57:46PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> > > > > This is to avoid tripping up kernel-doc which filters it out before > > but not after the name. > > > > Fixes: > > ./include/linux/iio/iio.h:628: warning: Function parameter or struct member '__private' not described in 'iio_dev' > > ./include/linux/iio/iio.h:628: warning: Excess struct member 'priv' description in 'iio_dev' > > ... > > > - void *priv __private; > > + void __private *priv; > > }; > > This is still inconsistent from the position perspective (while may still > work). I specifically placed it there, otherwise what you need is to have > > void * __private priv; > > to be fully consistent. > > That said, either you need to carefully reindent all the affected members, > or fix the kernel-doc, or both. Doh. Indeed. The marking was wrong and sparse tripped on it. I'll switch to void * __private priv; hideous though that is and not worry about indenting. We can then decide next cycle whether to tidy up better. >
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 11:14:51 +0000 Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> wrote: > On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 10:41:02 +0200 > Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 06:57:46PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> > > > > > > This is to avoid tripping up kernel-doc which filters it out before > > > but not after the name. > > > > > > Fixes: > > > ./include/linux/iio/iio.h:628: warning: Function parameter or struct member '__private' not described in 'iio_dev' > > > ./include/linux/iio/iio.h:628: warning: Excess struct member 'priv' description in 'iio_dev' > > > > ... > > > > > - void *priv __private; > > > + void __private *priv; > > > }; > > > > This is still inconsistent from the position perspective (while may still > > work). I specifically placed it there, otherwise what you need is to have > > > > void * __private priv; > > > > to be fully consistent. > > > > That said, either you need to carefully reindent all the affected members, > > or fix the kernel-doc, or both. > Doh. Indeed. The marking was wrong and sparse tripped on it. > > I'll switch to void * __private priv; hideous though that is and not worry about indenting. > > We can then decide next cycle whether to tidy up better. Style wise I decided this was least hideous void *__private priv; > > > >
diff --git a/include/linux/iio/iio.h b/include/linux/iio/iio.h index 59c58f455311..3350162f190f 100644 --- a/include/linux/iio/iio.h +++ b/include/linux/iio/iio.h @@ -624,7 +624,7 @@ struct iio_dev { const struct iio_info *info; const struct iio_buffer_setup_ops *setup_ops; - void *priv __private; + void __private *priv; }; int iio_device_id(struct iio_dev *indio_dev);