diff mbox series

[bpf-next,03/10] selftests/bpf: replace CHECK calls with ASSERT macros in flow_dissector test

Message ID 20241113-flow_dissector-v1-3-27c4df0592dc@bootlin.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series selftests/bpf: migrate test_flow_dissector.sh to test_progs | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 5 this patch: 5
netdev/build_tools success Errors and warnings before: 0 (+0) this patch: 0 (+0)
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 17 of 17 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 3 this patch: 3
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 3 this patch: 3
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 115 lines checked
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18

Commit Message

Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation) Nov. 13, 2024, 1:53 p.m. UTC
The flow dissector test currently relies on generic CHECK macros to
perform tests. Update those to newer, more-specific ASSERT macros.

This update allows to get rid of the global duration variable, which was
needed by the CHECK macros

Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation) <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/flow_dissector.c      | 41 +++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

Comments

Stanislav Fomichev Nov. 13, 2024, 5:34 p.m. UTC | #1
On 11/13, Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation) wrote:
> The flow dissector test currently relies on generic CHECK macros to
> perform tests. Update those to newer, more-specific ASSERT macros.
> 
> This update allows to get rid of the global duration variable, which was
> needed by the CHECK macros
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation) <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>

Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/flow_dissector.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/flow_dissector.c
index 3ea25ecdf3c92959f56ba0819130b453fd2379f7..6fbe8b6dad561aec02db552caea02517ac1e2109 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/flow_dissector.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/flow_dissector.c
@@ -79,7 +79,6 @@  struct test {
 
 #define VLAN_HLEN	4
 
-static __u32 duration;
 struct test tests[] = {
 	{
 		.name = "ipv4",
@@ -511,7 +510,7 @@  static void run_tests_skb_less(int tap_fd, struct bpf_map *keys)
 	int i, err, keys_fd;
 
 	keys_fd = bpf_map__fd(keys);
-	if (CHECK(keys_fd < 0, "bpf_map__fd", "err %d\n", keys_fd))
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_FD(keys_fd, "bpf_map__fd"))
 		return;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); i++) {
@@ -530,14 +529,16 @@  static void run_tests_skb_less(int tap_fd, struct bpf_map *keys)
 			continue;
 
 		err = tx_tap(tap_fd, &tests[i].pkt, sizeof(tests[i].pkt));
-		CHECK(err < 0, "tx_tap", "err %d errno %d\n", err, errno);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, sizeof(tests[i].pkt), "tx_tap"))
+			continue;
 
 		/* check the stored flow_keys only if BPF_OK expected */
 		if (tests[i].retval != BPF_OK)
 			continue;
 
 		err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(keys_fd, &key, &flow_keys);
-		ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_lookup_elem");
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_lookup_elem"))
+			continue;
 
 		ASSERT_MEMEQ(&flow_keys, &tests[i].keys,
 			     sizeof(struct bpf_flow_keys),
@@ -553,17 +554,17 @@  static void test_skb_less_prog_attach(struct bpf_flow *skel, int tap_fd)
 	int err, prog_fd;
 
 	prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs._dissect);
-	if (CHECK(prog_fd < 0, "bpf_program__fd", "err %d\n", prog_fd))
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_FD(prog_fd, "bpf_program__fd"))
 		return;
 
 	err = bpf_prog_attach(prog_fd, 0, BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR, 0);
-	if (CHECK(err, "bpf_prog_attach", "err %d errno %d\n", err, errno))
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_attach"))
 		return;
 
 	run_tests_skb_less(tap_fd, skel->maps.last_dissection);
 
 	err = bpf_prog_detach2(prog_fd, 0, BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR);
-	CHECK(err, "bpf_prog_detach2", "err %d errno %d\n", err, errno);
+	ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_detach2");
 }
 
 static void test_skb_less_link_create(struct bpf_flow *skel, int tap_fd)
@@ -572,7 +573,7 @@  static void test_skb_less_link_create(struct bpf_flow *skel, int tap_fd)
 	int err, net_fd;
 
 	net_fd = open("/proc/self/ns/net", O_RDONLY);
-	if (CHECK(net_fd < 0, "open(/proc/self/ns/net)", "err %d\n", errno))
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_FD(net_fd, "open(/proc/self/ns/net"))
 		return;
 
 	link = bpf_program__attach_netns(skel->progs._dissect, net_fd);
@@ -582,7 +583,7 @@  static void test_skb_less_link_create(struct bpf_flow *skel, int tap_fd)
 	run_tests_skb_less(tap_fd, skel->maps.last_dissection);
 
 	err = bpf_link__destroy(link);
-	CHECK(err, "bpf_link__destroy", "err %d\n", err);
+	ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_link__destroy");
 out_close:
 	close(net_fd);
 }
@@ -593,18 +594,18 @@  void test_flow_dissector(void)
 	struct bpf_flow *skel;
 
 	skel = bpf_flow__open_and_load();
-	if (CHECK(!skel, "skel", "failed to open/load skeleton\n"))
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "open/load skeleton"))
 		return;
 
 	prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs._dissect);
-	if (CHECK(prog_fd < 0, "bpf_program__fd", "err %d\n", prog_fd))
-		goto out_destroy_skel;
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_FD(prog_fd, "bpf_program__fd"))
+		return;
 	keys_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.last_dissection);
-	if (CHECK(keys_fd < 0, "bpf_map__fd", "err %d\n", keys_fd))
-		goto out_destroy_skel;
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_FD(keys_fd, "bpf_map__fd"))
+		return;
 	err = init_prog_array(skel->obj, skel->maps.jmp_table);
-	if (CHECK(err, "init_prog_array", "err %d\n", err))
-		goto out_destroy_skel;
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "init_prog_array"))
+		return;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); i++) {
 		struct bpf_flow_keys flow_keys;
@@ -634,17 +635,17 @@  void test_flow_dissector(void)
 			     sizeof(struct bpf_flow_keys),
 			     "returned flow keys");
 	}
-
 	/* Do the same tests but for skb-less flow dissector.
 	 * We use a known path in the net/tun driver that calls
 	 * eth_get_headlen and we manually export bpf_flow_keys
 	 * via BPF map in this case.
 	 */
-
 	tap_fd = create_tap("tap0");
-	CHECK(tap_fd < 0, "create_tap", "tap_fd %d errno %d\n", tap_fd, errno);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_FD(tap_fd, "create_tap"))
+		goto out_destroy_skel;
 	err = ifup("tap0");
-	CHECK(err, "ifup", "err %d errno %d\n", err, errno);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "ifup"))
+		goto out_destroy_skel;
 
 	/* Test direct prog attachment */
 	test_skb_less_prog_attach(skel, tap_fd);