Message ID | 60f962f7-1834-45da-bee9-c245c6797f9e@knaff.lu (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Under Review |
Delegated to: | Herbert Xu |
Headers | show |
Series | P*rtability of dash to legacy systems, such as AT&T Unix PC : 03-name-max | expand |
On Sun, Nov 17, 2024 at 10:32:38AM +0100, Alain Knaff wrote: > Hi, > > The third part of the patch set supplies a definition of NAME_MAX > where one is lacking. Please don't put that prefix in the Subject (P*rtability of dash to legacy systems, such as AT&T Unix PC :). There is a length limit to what patchwork will take from the Subject line and using this prefix of yours will cause all but the first patch to go in as a comment. Cheers,
Hello, for your possible interest.. Alain Knaff wrote in <60f962f7-1834-45da-bee9-c245c6797f9e@knaff.lu>: |The third part of the patch set supplies a definition of NAME_MAX |where one is lacking. ... |+#ifndef NAME_MAX |+/* NAME_MAX is only used in expand.c to make sure that we have a |+ buffer big enough to append the next local file part into during |+ globbing. So, in case of doubt, we need NAME_MAX to be bigger |+ rather than smaller, in order to prevent buffer overflow */ |+# define NAME_MAX PATH_MAX |+#endif i have for reasons i have forgotten otherwise /* POSIX 2008/Cor 1-2013 defines for * - _POSIX_PATH_MAX a minimum of 256 * - _XOPEN_PATH_MAX a minimum of 1024 * NFS RFC 1094 from March 1989 defines a MAXPATHLEN of 1024, so we really * should avoid anything smaller than that! */ #ifndef PATH_MAX # ifdef MAXPATHLEN # define PATH_MAX MAXPATHLEN # else # define PATH_MAX 1024 # endif #endif #if PATH_MAX + 0 < 1024 # undef PATH_MAX # define PATH_MAX 1024 #endif --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt) | |And in Fall, feel "The Dropbear Bard"s ball(s). | |The banded bear |without a care, |Banged on himself fore'er and e'er | |Farewell, dear collar bear
diff -X ../exclude.txt -urN dash-0.5.12+02-stat64/src/system.h dash-0.5.12+03-name-max/src/system.h --- dash-0.5.12+02-stat64/src/system.h 2020-06-03 02:23:24.000000000 +0000 +++ dash-0.5.12+03-name-max/src/system.h 2024-11-10 14:52:28.805681954 +0000 @@ -116,3 +116,11 @@ * code */ #define uninitialized_var(x) x = x + +#ifndef NAME_MAX +/* NAME_MAX is only used in expand.c to make sure that we have a + buffer big enough to append the next local file part into during + globbing. So, in case of doubt, we need NAME_MAX to be bigger + rather than smaller, in order to prevent buffer overflow */ +# define NAME_MAX PATH_MAX +#endif