| Message ID | 20241120080447.233393-1-quic_jiaymao@quicinc.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v1] att: Check security level before setting | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| tedd_an/pre-ci_am | fail | error: patch failed: src/shared/att.c:727 error: src/shared/att.c: patch does not apply hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch' to see the failed patch |
This is an automated email and please do not reply to this email. Dear Submitter, Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list. While preparing the CI tests, the patches you submitted couldn't be applied to the current HEAD of the repository. ----- Output ----- error: patch failed: src/shared/att.c:727 error: src/shared/att.c: patch does not apply hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch' to see the failed patch Please resolve the issue and submit the patches again. --- Regards, Linux Bluetooth
Hi Jiayang, On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 3:18 AM Jiayang Mao <quic_jiaymao@quicinc.com> wrote: > > bt_gatt_client_set_security could fail if the security level in > kernel is already BT_ATT_SECURITY_MEDIUM but long term key is not > ready. So, get and check the security level before setting it. Ive already pushed a similar fix. > Signed-off-by: Jiayang Mao <quic_jiaymao@quicinc.com> > --- > src/shared/att.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/src/shared/att.c b/src/shared/att.c > index 4a406f4b9..dabbdb431 100644 > --- a/src/shared/att.c > +++ b/src/shared/att.c > @@ -727,6 +727,9 @@ static bool bt_att_chan_set_security(struct bt_att_chan *chan, int level) > { > struct bt_security sec; > > + if (level == bt_att_chan_get_security(chan)) > + return true; > + > if (chan->type == BT_ATT_LOCAL) { > chan->sec_level = level; > return true; > -- > 2.25.1 > >
Hi Luiz, On 2024/11/20 22:20, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote: > Hi Jiayang, > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 3:18 AM Jiayang Mao <quic_jiaymao@quicinc.com> wrote: >> >> bt_gatt_client_set_security could fail if the security level in >> kernel is already BT_ATT_SECURITY_MEDIUM but long term key is not >> ready. So, get and check the security level before setting it. > > Ive already pushed a similar fix. I just saw your fix. Thank you very much for the update! > >> Signed-off-by: Jiayang Mao <quic_jiaymao@quicinc.com> >> --- >> src/shared/att.c | 3 +++ >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/src/shared/att.c b/src/shared/att.c >> index 4a406f4b9..dabbdb431 100644 >> --- a/src/shared/att.c >> +++ b/src/shared/att.c >> @@ -727,6 +727,9 @@ static bool bt_att_chan_set_security(struct bt_att_chan *chan, int level) >> { >> struct bt_security sec; >> >> + if (level == bt_att_chan_get_security(chan)) >> + return true; >> + >> if (chan->type == BT_ATT_LOCAL) { >> chan->sec_level = level; >> return true; >> -- >> 2.25.1 >> >> > >
diff --git a/src/shared/att.c b/src/shared/att.c index 4a406f4b9..dabbdb431 100644 --- a/src/shared/att.c +++ b/src/shared/att.c @@ -727,6 +727,9 @@ static bool bt_att_chan_set_security(struct bt_att_chan *chan, int level) { struct bt_security sec; + if (level == bt_att_chan_get_security(chan)) + return true; + if (chan->type == BT_ATT_LOCAL) { chan->sec_level = level; return true;
bt_gatt_client_set_security could fail if the security level in kernel is already BT_ATT_SECURITY_MEDIUM but long term key is not ready. So, get and check the security level before setting it. Signed-off-by: Jiayang Mao <quic_jiaymao@quicinc.com> --- src/shared/att.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)