@@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ static bool ip_can_use_hint(const struct sk_buff *skb, const struct iphdr *iph,
int tcp_v4_early_demux(struct sk_buff *skb);
int udp_v4_early_demux(struct sk_buff *skb);
-static int ip_rcv_finish_core(struct net *net, struct sock *sk,
+static int ip_rcv_finish_core(struct net *net,
struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
const struct sk_buff *hint)
{
@@ -444,7 +444,7 @@ static int ip_rcv_finish(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
if (!skb)
return NET_RX_SUCCESS;
- ret = ip_rcv_finish_core(net, sk, skb, dev, NULL);
+ ret = ip_rcv_finish_core(net, skb, dev, NULL);
if (ret != NET_RX_DROP)
ret = dst_input(skb);
return ret;
@@ -610,7 +610,7 @@ static void ip_list_rcv_finish(struct net *net, struct sock *sk,
skb = l3mdev_ip_rcv(skb);
if (!skb)
continue;
- if (ip_rcv_finish_core(net, sk, skb, dev, hint) == NET_RX_DROP)
+ if (ip_rcv_finish_core(net, skb, dev, hint) == NET_RX_DROP)
continue;
dst = skb_dst(skb);
When I wanted to kprobe the ip_rcv_finish_core, I found that using x1 to pass "struct sk_buff *skb"."struct sock *sk" was not used in the function, causing the compiler to optimize away. This resulted in a hard to use kprobe. Why not delete him? Signed-off-by: tianyu2 <tianyu2@kernelsoft.com> --- net/ipv4/ip_input.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)