mbox series

[RFC,v2,0/3] pidfs: file handle preliminaries

Message ID 20241129-work-pidfs-v2-0-61043d66fbce@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series pidfs: file handle preliminaries | expand

Message

Christian Brauner Nov. 29, 2024, 1:02 p.m. UTC
Hey,

This reworks the inode number allocation for pidfs in order to support
file handles properly.

Recently we received a patchset that aims to enable file handle encoding
and decoding via name_to_handle_at(2) and open_by_handle_at(2).

A crucical step in the patch series is how to go from inode number to
struct pid without leaking information into unprivileged contexts. The
issue is that in order to find a struct pid the pid number in the
initial pid namespace must be encoded into the file handle via
name_to_handle_at(2). This can be used by containers using a separate
pid namespace to learn what the pid number of a given process in the
initial pid namespace is. While this is a weak information leak it could
be used in various exploits and in general is an ugly wart in the
design.

To solve this problem a new way is needed to lookup a struct pid based
on the inode number allocated for that struct pid. The other part is to
remove the custom inode number allocation on 32bit systems that is also
an ugly wart that should go away.

So, a new scheme is used that I was discusssing with Tejun some time
back. A cyclic ida is used for the lower 32 bits and a the high 32 bits
are used for the generation number. This gives a 64 bit inode number
that is unique on both 32 bit and 64 bit. The lower 32 bit number is
recycled slowly and can be used to lookup struct pids.

Thanks!
Christian

---
Changes in v2:
- Remove __maybe_unused pidfd_ino_get_pid() function that was only there
  for initial illustration purposes.
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241128-work-pidfs-v1-0-80f267639d98@kernel.org

---
Christian Brauner (3):
      pidfs: rework inode number allocation
      pidfs: remove 32bit inode number handling
      pidfs: support FS_IOC_GETVERSION

 fs/pidfs.c            | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 include/linux/pidfs.h |   2 +
 kernel/pid.c          |  14 +++---
 3 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: b86545e02e8c22fb89218f29d381fa8e8b91d815
change-id: 20241128-work-pidfs-2bd42c7ea772

Comments

Jeff Layton Nov. 29, 2024, 2:27 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, 2024-11-29 at 14:02 +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> Hey,
> 
> This reworks the inode number allocation for pidfs in order to support
> file handles properly.
> 
> Recently we received a patchset that aims to enable file handle encoding
> and decoding via name_to_handle_at(2) and open_by_handle_at(2).
> 
> A crucical step in the patch series is how to go from inode number to
> struct pid without leaking information into unprivileged contexts. The
> issue is that in order to find a struct pid the pid number in the
> initial pid namespace must be encoded into the file handle via
> name_to_handle_at(2). This can be used by containers using a separate
> pid namespace to learn what the pid number of a given process in the
> initial pid namespace is. While this is a weak information leak it could
> be used in various exploits and in general is an ugly wart in the
> design.
> 
> To solve this problem a new way is needed to lookup a struct pid based
> on the inode number allocated for that struct pid. The other part is to
> remove the custom inode number allocation on 32bit systems that is also
> an ugly wart that should go away.
> 
> So, a new scheme is used that I was discusssing with Tejun some time
> back. A cyclic ida is used for the lower 32 bits and a the high 32 bits
> are used for the generation number. This gives a 64 bit inode number
> that is unique on both 32 bit and 64 bit. The lower 32 bit number is
> recycled slowly and can be used to lookup struct pids.
> 
> Thanks!
> Christian
> 
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Remove __maybe_unused pidfd_ino_get_pid() function that was only there
>   for initial illustration purposes.
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241128-work-pidfs-v1-0-80f267639d98@kernel.org
> 
> ---
> Christian Brauner (3):
>       pidfs: rework inode number allocation
>       pidfs: remove 32bit inode number handling
>       pidfs: support FS_IOC_GETVERSION
> 
>  fs/pidfs.c            | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  include/linux/pidfs.h |   2 +
>  kernel/pid.c          |  14 +++---
>  3 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: b86545e02e8c22fb89218f29d381fa8e8b91d815
> change-id: 20241128-work-pidfs-2bd42c7ea772
> 
> 

This seems like a good stopgap fix until we can sort out how to get to
64-bit inode numbers internally everywhere.

Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Amir Goldstein Nov. 29, 2024, 2:34 p.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 3:27 PM Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2024-11-29 at 14:02 +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > This reworks the inode number allocation for pidfs in order to support
> > file handles properly.
> >
> > Recently we received a patchset that aims to enable file handle encoding
> > and decoding via name_to_handle_at(2) and open_by_handle_at(2).
> >
> > A crucical step in the patch series is how to go from inode number to
> > struct pid without leaking information into unprivileged contexts. The
> > issue is that in order to find a struct pid the pid number in the
> > initial pid namespace must be encoded into the file handle via
> > name_to_handle_at(2). This can be used by containers using a separate
> > pid namespace to learn what the pid number of a given process in the
> > initial pid namespace is. While this is a weak information leak it could
> > be used in various exploits and in general is an ugly wart in the
> > design.
> >
> > To solve this problem a new way is needed to lookup a struct pid based
> > on the inode number allocated for that struct pid. The other part is to
> > remove the custom inode number allocation on 32bit systems that is also
> > an ugly wart that should go away.
> >
> > So, a new scheme is used that I was discusssing with Tejun some time
> > back. A cyclic ida is used for the lower 32 bits and a the high 32 bits
> > are used for the generation number. This gives a 64 bit inode number
> > that is unique on both 32 bit and 64 bit. The lower 32 bit number is
> > recycled slowly and can be used to lookup struct pids.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Christian
> >
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Remove __maybe_unused pidfd_ino_get_pid() function that was only there
> >   for initial illustration purposes.
> > - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241128-work-pidfs-v1-0-80f267639d98@kernel.org
> >
> > ---
> > Christian Brauner (3):
> >       pidfs: rework inode number allocation
> >       pidfs: remove 32bit inode number handling
> >       pidfs: support FS_IOC_GETVERSION
> >
> >  fs/pidfs.c            | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> >  include/linux/pidfs.h |   2 +
> >  kernel/pid.c          |  14 +++---
> >  3 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
> > ---
> > base-commit: b86545e02e8c22fb89218f29d381fa8e8b91d815
> > change-id: 20241128-work-pidfs-2bd42c7ea772
> >
> >
>
> This seems like a good stopgap fix until we can sort out how to get to
> 64-bit inode numbers internally everywhere.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>

Yep. look good

Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>