Message ID | 20241217005704.3101181-1-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | drm/i915/slpc: Add sysfs for SLPC power profiles | expand |
On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 04:57:04PM -0800, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote: > Default SLPC power profile is Base(0). Power Saving mode(1) > has conservative up/down thresholds and is suitable for use with > apps that typically need to be power efficient. > > Cc: Sushma Venkatesh Reddy <sushma.venkatesh.reddy@intel.com> > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++ > .../drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_actions_slpc_abi.h | 5 +++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h | 1 + > .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h | 2 ++ > 5 files changed, 76 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c > index d7784650e4d9..52a5ff94a0e3 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c > @@ -464,6 +464,33 @@ static ssize_t slpc_ignore_eff_freq_store(struct kobject *kobj, > return err ?: count; > } > > +static ssize_t slpc_power_profile_show(struct kobject *kobj, > + struct kobj_attribute *attr, > + char *buff) > +{ > + struct intel_gt *gt = intel_gt_sysfs_get_drvdata(kobj, attr->attr.name); > + struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc = >->uc.guc.slpc; > + > + return sysfs_emit(buff, "%u\n", slpc->power_profile); what if we do something like this: cat /sys/class/drm/card1/gt/gt0/slpc_power_profile [balanced] power_savings echo power_savings > /sys/class/drm/card1/gt/gt0/slpc_power_profile cat /sys/class/drm/card1/gt/gt0/slpc_power_profile balanced [power_savings] And second question, shouldn't we disable waitboost so this won't compete? Also I believe we should provide some kernel documentation documenting what would be the governor levels like and recommended settings for each level. And then in Xe we should probably add a governor selection in the same style as devfreq, but with our configs... Thoughts? But the code looks good and I believe many cases out there could benefit of some extra Watts saved by having this option available... > +} > + > +static ssize_t slpc_power_profile_store(struct kobject *kobj, > + struct kobj_attribute *attr, > + const char *buff, size_t count) > +{ > + struct intel_gt *gt = intel_gt_sysfs_get_drvdata(kobj, attr->attr.name); > + struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc = >->uc.guc.slpc; > + int err; > + u32 val; > + > + err = kstrtou32(buff, 0, &val); > + if (err) > + return err; > + > + err = intel_guc_slpc_set_power_profile(slpc, val); > + return err ?: count; > +} > + > struct intel_gt_bool_throttle_attr { > struct attribute attr; > ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, > @@ -668,6 +695,7 @@ INTEL_GT_ATTR_RO(media_RP0_freq_mhz); > INTEL_GT_ATTR_RO(media_RPn_freq_mhz); > > INTEL_GT_ATTR_RW(slpc_ignore_eff_freq); > +INTEL_GT_ATTR_RW(slpc_power_profile); > > static const struct attribute *media_perf_power_attrs[] = { > &attr_media_freq_factor.attr, > @@ -864,6 +892,13 @@ void intel_gt_sysfs_pm_init(struct intel_gt *gt, struct kobject *kobj) > gt_warn(gt, "failed to create ignore_eff_freq sysfs (%pe)", ERR_PTR(ret)); > } > > + if (intel_uc_uses_guc_slpc(>->uc)) { > + ret = sysfs_create_file(kobj, &attr_slpc_power_profile.attr); > + if (ret) > + gt_warn(gt, "failed to create slpc_power_profile sysfs (%pe)", > + ERR_PTR(ret)); > + } > + > if (i915_mmio_reg_valid(intel_gt_perf_limit_reasons_reg(gt))) { > ret = sysfs_create_files(kobj, throttle_reason_attrs); > if (ret) > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_actions_slpc_abi.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_actions_slpc_abi.h > index c34674e797c6..6de87ae5669e 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_actions_slpc_abi.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_actions_slpc_abi.h > @@ -228,6 +228,11 @@ struct slpc_optimized_strategies { > > #define SLPC_OPTIMIZED_STRATEGY_COMPUTE REG_BIT(0) > > +enum slpc_power_profiles { > + SLPC_POWER_PROFILES_BASE = 0x0, > + SLPC_POWER_PROFILES_POWER_SAVING = 0x1 > +}; > + > /** > * DOC: SLPC H2G MESSAGE FORMAT > * > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c > index 706fffca698b..0ee88ee347ae 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c > @@ -265,6 +265,8 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_init(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc) > slpc->num_boosts = 0; > slpc->media_ratio_mode = SLPC_MEDIA_RATIO_MODE_DYNAMIC_CONTROL; > > + slpc->power_profile = SLPC_POWER_PROFILES_BASE; > + > mutex_init(&slpc->lock); > INIT_WORK(&slpc->boost_work, slpc_boost_work); > > @@ -567,6 +569,34 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_set_media_ratio_mode(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 val) > return ret; > } > > +int intel_guc_slpc_set_power_profile(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 val) > +{ > + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = slpc_to_i915(slpc); > + intel_wakeref_t wakeref; > + int ret = 0; > + > + if (val > SLPC_POWER_PROFILES_POWER_SAVING) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + mutex_lock(&slpc->lock); > + wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get(&i915->runtime_pm); > + > + ret = slpc_set_param(slpc, > + SLPC_PARAM_POWER_PROFILE, > + val); > + if (ret) > + guc_err(slpc_to_guc(slpc), > + "Failed to set power profile to %d: %pe\n", > + val, ERR_PTR(ret)); > + else > + slpc->power_profile = val; > + > + intel_runtime_pm_put(&i915->runtime_pm, wakeref); > + mutex_unlock(&slpc->lock); > + > + return ret; > +} > + > void intel_guc_pm_intrmsk_enable(struct intel_gt *gt) > { > u32 pm_intrmsk_mbz = 0; > @@ -728,6 +758,9 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_enable(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc) > /* Enable SLPC Optimized Strategy for compute */ > intel_guc_slpc_set_strategy(slpc, SLPC_OPTIMIZED_STRATEGY_COMPUTE); > > + /* Set cached value of power_profile */ > + intel_guc_slpc_set_power_profile(slpc, slpc->power_profile); > + > return 0; > } > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h > index 1cb5fd44f05c..fc9f761b4372 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h > @@ -46,5 +46,6 @@ void intel_guc_slpc_boost(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc); > void intel_guc_slpc_dec_waiters(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc); > int intel_guc_slpc_set_ignore_eff_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, bool val); > int intel_guc_slpc_set_strategy(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 val); > +int intel_guc_slpc_set_power_profile(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 val); > > #endif > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h > index a88651331497..2351a1693aa1 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h > @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ struct intel_guc_slpc { > u32 max_freq_softlimit; > bool ignore_eff_freq; > > + u32 power_profile; > + > /* cached media ratio mode */ > u32 media_ratio_mode; > > -- > 2.38.1 >
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c index d7784650e4d9..52a5ff94a0e3 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c @@ -464,6 +464,33 @@ static ssize_t slpc_ignore_eff_freq_store(struct kobject *kobj, return err ?: count; } +static ssize_t slpc_power_profile_show(struct kobject *kobj, + struct kobj_attribute *attr, + char *buff) +{ + struct intel_gt *gt = intel_gt_sysfs_get_drvdata(kobj, attr->attr.name); + struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc = >->uc.guc.slpc; + + return sysfs_emit(buff, "%u\n", slpc->power_profile); +} + +static ssize_t slpc_power_profile_store(struct kobject *kobj, + struct kobj_attribute *attr, + const char *buff, size_t count) +{ + struct intel_gt *gt = intel_gt_sysfs_get_drvdata(kobj, attr->attr.name); + struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc = >->uc.guc.slpc; + int err; + u32 val; + + err = kstrtou32(buff, 0, &val); + if (err) + return err; + + err = intel_guc_slpc_set_power_profile(slpc, val); + return err ?: count; +} + struct intel_gt_bool_throttle_attr { struct attribute attr; ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, @@ -668,6 +695,7 @@ INTEL_GT_ATTR_RO(media_RP0_freq_mhz); INTEL_GT_ATTR_RO(media_RPn_freq_mhz); INTEL_GT_ATTR_RW(slpc_ignore_eff_freq); +INTEL_GT_ATTR_RW(slpc_power_profile); static const struct attribute *media_perf_power_attrs[] = { &attr_media_freq_factor.attr, @@ -864,6 +892,13 @@ void intel_gt_sysfs_pm_init(struct intel_gt *gt, struct kobject *kobj) gt_warn(gt, "failed to create ignore_eff_freq sysfs (%pe)", ERR_PTR(ret)); } + if (intel_uc_uses_guc_slpc(>->uc)) { + ret = sysfs_create_file(kobj, &attr_slpc_power_profile.attr); + if (ret) + gt_warn(gt, "failed to create slpc_power_profile sysfs (%pe)", + ERR_PTR(ret)); + } + if (i915_mmio_reg_valid(intel_gt_perf_limit_reasons_reg(gt))) { ret = sysfs_create_files(kobj, throttle_reason_attrs); if (ret) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_actions_slpc_abi.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_actions_slpc_abi.h index c34674e797c6..6de87ae5669e 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_actions_slpc_abi.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_actions_slpc_abi.h @@ -228,6 +228,11 @@ struct slpc_optimized_strategies { #define SLPC_OPTIMIZED_STRATEGY_COMPUTE REG_BIT(0) +enum slpc_power_profiles { + SLPC_POWER_PROFILES_BASE = 0x0, + SLPC_POWER_PROFILES_POWER_SAVING = 0x1 +}; + /** * DOC: SLPC H2G MESSAGE FORMAT * diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c index 706fffca698b..0ee88ee347ae 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c @@ -265,6 +265,8 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_init(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc) slpc->num_boosts = 0; slpc->media_ratio_mode = SLPC_MEDIA_RATIO_MODE_DYNAMIC_CONTROL; + slpc->power_profile = SLPC_POWER_PROFILES_BASE; + mutex_init(&slpc->lock); INIT_WORK(&slpc->boost_work, slpc_boost_work); @@ -567,6 +569,34 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_set_media_ratio_mode(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 val) return ret; } +int intel_guc_slpc_set_power_profile(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 val) +{ + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = slpc_to_i915(slpc); + intel_wakeref_t wakeref; + int ret = 0; + + if (val > SLPC_POWER_PROFILES_POWER_SAVING) + return -EINVAL; + + mutex_lock(&slpc->lock); + wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get(&i915->runtime_pm); + + ret = slpc_set_param(slpc, + SLPC_PARAM_POWER_PROFILE, + val); + if (ret) + guc_err(slpc_to_guc(slpc), + "Failed to set power profile to %d: %pe\n", + val, ERR_PTR(ret)); + else + slpc->power_profile = val; + + intel_runtime_pm_put(&i915->runtime_pm, wakeref); + mutex_unlock(&slpc->lock); + + return ret; +} + void intel_guc_pm_intrmsk_enable(struct intel_gt *gt) { u32 pm_intrmsk_mbz = 0; @@ -728,6 +758,9 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_enable(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc) /* Enable SLPC Optimized Strategy for compute */ intel_guc_slpc_set_strategy(slpc, SLPC_OPTIMIZED_STRATEGY_COMPUTE); + /* Set cached value of power_profile */ + intel_guc_slpc_set_power_profile(slpc, slpc->power_profile); + return 0; } diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h index 1cb5fd44f05c..fc9f761b4372 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h @@ -46,5 +46,6 @@ void intel_guc_slpc_boost(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc); void intel_guc_slpc_dec_waiters(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc); int intel_guc_slpc_set_ignore_eff_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, bool val); int intel_guc_slpc_set_strategy(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 val); +int intel_guc_slpc_set_power_profile(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 val); #endif diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h index a88651331497..2351a1693aa1 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ struct intel_guc_slpc { u32 max_freq_softlimit; bool ignore_eff_freq; + u32 power_profile; + /* cached media ratio mode */ u32 media_ratio_mode;
Default SLPC power profile is Base(0). Power Saving mode(1) has conservative up/down thresholds and is suitable for use with apps that typically need to be power efficient. Cc: Sushma Venkatesh Reddy <sushma.venkatesh.reddy@intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++ .../drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_actions_slpc_abi.h | 5 +++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h | 1 + .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h | 2 ++ 5 files changed, 76 insertions(+)