diff mbox series

[v22,20/20] bpf: Use ftrace_get_symaddr() for kprobe_multi probes

Message ID 173519012541.391279.12203132904339088937.stgit@devnote2 (mailing list archive)
State New
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series tracing: fprobe: function_graph: Multi-function graph and fprobe on fgraph | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat-kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat-meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat-kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat-meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat-kernel / x86_64-gcc veristat_kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat-kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat-meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-44 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-45 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat-kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-46 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat-meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat-meta / x86_64-gcc veristat_meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-42 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-43 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR fail PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 fail Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 fail Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
netdev/series_format fail Series longer than 15 patches
netdev/tree_selection success Guessed tree name to be net-next
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit fail Errors and warnings before: 1 this patch: 2
netdev/build_tools success No tools touched, skip
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 11 maintainers not CCed: john.fastabend@gmail.com daniel@iogearbox.net yonghong.song@linux.dev eddyz87@gmail.com andrii@kernel.org sdf@fomichev.me song@kernel.org mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com kpsingh@kernel.org mattbobrowski@google.com haoluo@google.com
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 18 this patch: 18
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 19 this patch: 19
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 31 lines checked
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Masami Hiramatsu (Google) Dec. 26, 2024, 5:15 a.m. UTC
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>

Add ftrace_get_entry_ip() which is only for ftrace based probes, and use
it for kprobe multi probes because they are based on fprobe which uses
ftrace instead of kprobes.

Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
---
 Changes in v21:
  - Use new ftreace_get_symaddr() only for kprobe multi probes.
 Changes in v19:
  - Use ftrace_get_symaddr() instead of introducing new arch dependent code.
  - Also, replace x86 code with ftrace_get_symaddr(), which does the same
   thing.
---
 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c |   13 +++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Steven Rostedt Dec. 27, 2024, 2:23 a.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 14:15:25 +0900
"Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:

> From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> 
> Add ftrace_get_entry_ip() which is only for ftrace based probes, and use
> it for kprobe multi probes because they are based on fprobe which uses
> ftrace instead of kprobes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>

On my 32bit build, I hit a new warning;

kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1073:22: warning: ‘ftrace_get_entry_ip’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
 1073 | static unsigned long ftrace_get_entry_ip(unsigned long fentry_ip)
      |                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Config attached.

-- Steve


> ---
>  Changes in v21:
>   - Use new ftreace_get_symaddr() only for kprobe multi probes.
>  Changes in v19:
>   - Use ftrace_get_symaddr() instead of introducing new arch dependent code.
>   - Also, replace x86 code with ftrace_get_symaddr(), which does the same
>    thing.
> ---
>  kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c |   13 +++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> index 863351559334..47beb70187d7 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> @@ -1070,6 +1070,13 @@ static unsigned long get_entry_ip(unsigned long fentry_ip)
>  #define get_entry_ip(fentry_ip) fentry_ip
>  #endif
>  
> +static unsigned long ftrace_get_entry_ip(unsigned long fentry_ip)
> +{
> +	unsigned long ip = ftrace_get_symaddr(fentry_ip);
> +
> +	return ip ? : fentry_ip;
> +}
> +
>  BPF_CALL_1(bpf_get_func_ip_kprobe, struct pt_regs *, regs)
>  {
>  	struct bpf_trace_run_ctx *run_ctx __maybe_unused;
> @@ -2829,7 +2836,8 @@ kprobe_multi_link_handler(struct fprobe *fp, unsigned long fentry_ip,
>  	int err;
>  
>  	link = container_of(fp, struct bpf_kprobe_multi_link, fp);
> -	err = kprobe_multi_link_prog_run(link, get_entry_ip(fentry_ip), fregs, false, data);
> +	err = kprobe_multi_link_prog_run(link, ftrace_get_entry_ip(fentry_ip),
> +					 fregs, false, data);
>  	return is_kprobe_session(link->link.prog) ? err : 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -2841,7 +2849,8 @@ kprobe_multi_link_exit_handler(struct fprobe *fp, unsigned long fentry_ip,
>  	struct bpf_kprobe_multi_link *link;
>  
>  	link = container_of(fp, struct bpf_kprobe_multi_link, fp);
> -	kprobe_multi_link_prog_run(link, get_entry_ip(fentry_ip), fregs, true, data);
> +	kprobe_multi_link_prog_run(link, ftrace_get_entry_ip(fentry_ip),
> +				   fregs, true, data);
>  }
>  
>  static int symbols_cmp_r(const void *a, const void *b, const void *priv)
Steven Rostedt Dec. 27, 2024, 2:24 a.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 21:23:39 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:

> On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 14:15:25 +0900
> "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> > 
> > Add ftrace_get_entry_ip() which is only for ftrace based probes, and use
> > it for kprobe multi probes because they are based on fprobe which uses
> > ftrace instead of kprobes.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>  
> 
> On my 32bit build, I hit a new warning;
> 
> kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1073:22: warning: ‘ftrace_get_entry_ip’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>  1073 | static unsigned long ftrace_get_entry_ip(unsigned long fentry_ip)
>       |                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> Config attached.


Since this is the last patch of the series, just send a new patch for this one.
I'll continue testing the rest of the patches.

-- Steve
Steven Rostedt Dec. 27, 2024, 3:24 p.m. UTC | #3
On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 21:24:53 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:

> > On my 32bit build, I hit a new warning;
> > 
> > kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1073:22: warning: ‘ftrace_get_entry_ip’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> >  1073 | static unsigned long ftrace_get_entry_ip(unsigned long fentry_ip)
> >       |                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > 
> > Config attached.  
> 
> 
> Since this is the last patch of the series, just send a new patch for this one.
> I'll continue testing the rest of the patches.

The tests passed without this patch so I applied them to my for-next branch.

If you fix this, you just need to send this patch only.

Thanks,

-- Steve
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index 863351559334..47beb70187d7 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -1070,6 +1070,13 @@  static unsigned long get_entry_ip(unsigned long fentry_ip)
 #define get_entry_ip(fentry_ip) fentry_ip
 #endif
 
+static unsigned long ftrace_get_entry_ip(unsigned long fentry_ip)
+{
+	unsigned long ip = ftrace_get_symaddr(fentry_ip);
+
+	return ip ? : fentry_ip;
+}
+
 BPF_CALL_1(bpf_get_func_ip_kprobe, struct pt_regs *, regs)
 {
 	struct bpf_trace_run_ctx *run_ctx __maybe_unused;
@@ -2829,7 +2836,8 @@  kprobe_multi_link_handler(struct fprobe *fp, unsigned long fentry_ip,
 	int err;
 
 	link = container_of(fp, struct bpf_kprobe_multi_link, fp);
-	err = kprobe_multi_link_prog_run(link, get_entry_ip(fentry_ip), fregs, false, data);
+	err = kprobe_multi_link_prog_run(link, ftrace_get_entry_ip(fentry_ip),
+					 fregs, false, data);
 	return is_kprobe_session(link->link.prog) ? err : 0;
 }
 
@@ -2841,7 +2849,8 @@  kprobe_multi_link_exit_handler(struct fprobe *fp, unsigned long fentry_ip,
 	struct bpf_kprobe_multi_link *link;
 
 	link = container_of(fp, struct bpf_kprobe_multi_link, fp);
-	kprobe_multi_link_prog_run(link, get_entry_ip(fentry_ip), fregs, true, data);
+	kprobe_multi_link_prog_run(link, ftrace_get_entry_ip(fentry_ip),
+				   fregs, true, data);
 }
 
 static int symbols_cmp_r(const void *a, const void *b, const void *priv)