Message ID | 20241226122023.3439559-3-rohit.visavalia@amd.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | clk: xilinx: vcu: Sequence update and couple of fixes | expand |
Quoting Rohit Visavalia (2024-12-26 04:20:22) > CCF will try to adjust parent clock to set desire clock frequency of > child clock. So if pll_ref is not a fixed-clock then while setting rate > of enc/dec clocks pll_ref may get change, which may make VCU malfunction. > > Signed-off-by: Rohit Visavalia <rohit.visavalia@amd.com> > --- > drivers/clk/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c b/drivers/clk/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c > index f294a2398cb4..c3a4df7e325a 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c > @@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ static int xvcu_register_clock_provider(struct xvcu_device *xvcu) > return PTR_ERR(hw); > xvcu->pll_post = hw; > > - parent_data[0].fw_name = "pll_ref"; > + parent_data[0].fw_name = "dummy_name"; "dummy_name" isn't part of the binding. It sounds like you want to not set CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT flag sometimes? > parent_data[1].hw = xvcu->pll_post; > > hws[CLK_XVCU_ENC_CORE] =
Hi Stephen, Thanks for the review. >-----Original Message----- >From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> >Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2024 6:06 AM >To: Visavalia, Rohit <rohit.visavalia@amd.com>; Simek, Michal ><michal.simek@amd.com>; mturquette@baylibre.com; Sagar, Vishal ><vishal.sagar@amd.com> >Cc: javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com; geert+renesas@glider.be; u.kleine- >koenig@baylibre.com; linux-clk@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm- >kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Visavalia, Rohit ><rohit.visavalia@amd.com> >Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] clk: xilinx: vcu: don't set pll_ref as parent of >VCU(enc/dec) clocks > >Quoting Rohit Visavalia (2024-12-26 04:20:22) >> CCF will try to adjust parent clock to set desire clock frequency of >> child clock. So if pll_ref is not a fixed-clock then while setting >> rate of enc/dec clocks pll_ref may get change, which may make VCU >malfunction. >> >> Signed-off-by: Rohit Visavalia <rohit.visavalia@amd.com> >> --- >> drivers/clk/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c >> b/drivers/clk/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c index f294a2398cb4..c3a4df7e325a >> 100644 >> --- a/drivers/clk/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c >> +++ b/drivers/clk/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c >> @@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ static int xvcu_register_clock_provider(struct >xvcu_device *xvcu) >> return PTR_ERR(hw); >> xvcu->pll_post = hw; >> >> - parent_data[0].fw_name = "pll_ref"; >> + parent_data[0].fw_name = "dummy_name"; > >"dummy_name" isn't part of the binding. It sounds like you want to not set >CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT flag sometimes? Yes, if parent rate(pll_ref) has been changed then VCU is not working correctly. So, making name as dummy. > >> parent_data[1].hw = xvcu->pll_post; >> >> hws[CLK_XVCU_ENC_CORE] = Thanks Rohit
diff --git a/drivers/clk/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c b/drivers/clk/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c index f294a2398cb4..c3a4df7e325a 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c +++ b/drivers/clk/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c @@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ static int xvcu_register_clock_provider(struct xvcu_device *xvcu) return PTR_ERR(hw); xvcu->pll_post = hw; - parent_data[0].fw_name = "pll_ref"; + parent_data[0].fw_name = "dummy_name"; parent_data[1].hw = xvcu->pll_post; hws[CLK_XVCU_ENC_CORE] =
CCF will try to adjust parent clock to set desire clock frequency of child clock. So if pll_ref is not a fixed-clock then while setting rate of enc/dec clocks pll_ref may get change, which may make VCU malfunction. Signed-off-by: Rohit Visavalia <rohit.visavalia@amd.com> --- drivers/clk/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)