Message ID | 20241230-b4-linux-next-24-11-18-clock-multiple-power-domains-v9-1-f15fb405efa5@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Under Review |
Headers | show |
Series | clk: qcom: Add support for multiple power-domains for a clock controller. | expand |
On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 01:30:18PM +0000, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > gdsc_unregister() should release subdomains in the reverse order to the > order in which those subdomains were added. > This sounds very reasonable to me, but what's the actual reason? > Fixes: 1b771839de05 ("clk: qcom: gdsc: enable optional power domain support") > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Without a reason it's hard to see why this needs to be backported. Regards, Bjorn > Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c > index fa5fe4c2a2ee7786c2e8858f3e41301f639e5d59..bc1b1e37bf4222017c172b77603f8dedba961ed5 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c > @@ -571,7 +571,7 @@ void gdsc_unregister(struct gdsc_desc *desc) > size_t num = desc->num; > > /* Remove subdomains */ > - for (i = 0; i < num; i++) { > + for (i = num - 1; i >= 0; i--) { > if (!scs[i]) > continue; > if (scs[i]->parent) > > -- > 2.45.2 >
On 06/01/2025 16:53, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > This sounds very reasonable to me, but what's the actual reason? > >> Fixes: 1b771839de05 ("clk: qcom: gdsc: enable optional power domain support") >> Cc:stable@vger.kernel.org > Without a reason it's hard to see why this needs to be backported. > > Regards, > Bjorn The reason is it makes the next patch much cleaner and makes backporting the Fixes in the next patch cleaner too. I could squash the two patches together as another option..
On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 04:55:18PM +0000, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > On 06/01/2025 16:53, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > This sounds very reasonable to me, but what's the actual reason? > > > > > Fixes: 1b771839de05 ("clk: qcom: gdsc: enable optional power domain support") > > > Cc:stable@vger.kernel.org > > Without a reason it's hard to see why this needs to be backported. > > > > Regards, > > Bjorn > > The reason is it makes the next patch much cleaner and makes backporting the > Fixes in the next patch cleaner too. > That makes sense, but let's state that in the commit message then. > I could squash the two patches together as another option.. That would work too. Although in the unexpected case that the order has any impact on outcome it would still be nice to have a comment about why it was done - and why it was flagged for stable backporting. Regards, Bjorn
diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c index fa5fe4c2a2ee7786c2e8858f3e41301f639e5d59..bc1b1e37bf4222017c172b77603f8dedba961ed5 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c @@ -571,7 +571,7 @@ void gdsc_unregister(struct gdsc_desc *desc) size_t num = desc->num; /* Remove subdomains */ - for (i = 0; i < num; i++) { + for (i = num - 1; i >= 0; i--) { if (!scs[i]) continue; if (scs[i]->parent)
gdsc_unregister() should release subdomains in the reverse order to the order in which those subdomains were added. Fixes: 1b771839de05 ("clk: qcom: gdsc: enable optional power domain support") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org> --- drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)