Message ID | cover.1736261047.git.marcelo.schmitt@analog.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Re-add filter_type/filter_mode | expand |
On 1/7/25 9:11 AM, Marcelo Schmitt wrote: > Better document sysfs ABI for ADC digital filter configuration. > > Change log v1 -> v2 > - Split into 3 patches. > - Re-added sysfs-bus-iio-adc-ad4130 to keep filter_mode separate from filter_type. If ad7779 is the only driver with filter_type{,available} attributes while ad4130 and admv8818 both have filter_mode{,available} attributes, shouldn't we be deprecating filter_type and promoting filter_mode? (Looks like I might have got that backwards in my previous reply. :-/)
On 01/07, David Lechner wrote: > On 1/7/25 9:11 AM, Marcelo Schmitt wrote: > > Better document sysfs ABI for ADC digital filter configuration. > > > > Change log v1 -> v2 > > - Split into 3 patches. > > - Re-added sysfs-bus-iio-adc-ad4130 to keep filter_mode separate from filter_type. > > If ad7779 is the only driver with filter_type{,available} attributes while > ad4130 and admv8818 both have filter_mode{,available} attributes, shouldn't we > be deprecating filter_type and promoting filter_mode? Oh, I had only grepped the adc dir and I didn't noticed admv8818 also had filter_mode. Hmm, don't know, though still biased towards filter_type. - The admv8818 filter_mode_available ABI exports different values (auto, manual, bypass). - AD7768-1, ADAQ7768-1, AD7768/AD7768-4, AD7124-4, and AD4170 datasheets refer to sinc filters as filter types (though not all of those designs are supported in IIO or have filter attributes). - The AD4130 datasheets also refers to the digital filter as filter type in some occasions. But some datasheets seem to use filter mode and filter type interchangeably so I don't know. The admv8818 use case is valid and is both low and high-pass filtering while the ADCs sinc digital filters act like low-pass filter. Maybe even provide a different name for ADC digital filtering? digital_filter_type (or digital_filter_mode)?. Thanks for pointing that out.
On 1/7/25 11:44 AM, Marcelo Schmitt wrote: > On 01/07, David Lechner wrote: >> On 1/7/25 9:11 AM, Marcelo Schmitt wrote: >>> Better document sysfs ABI for ADC digital filter configuration. >>> >>> Change log v1 -> v2 >>> - Split into 3 patches. >>> - Re-added sysfs-bus-iio-adc-ad4130 to keep filter_mode separate from filter_type. >> >> If ad7779 is the only driver with filter_type{,available} attributes while >> ad4130 and admv8818 both have filter_mode{,available} attributes, shouldn't we >> be deprecating filter_type and promoting filter_mode? > > Oh, I had only grepped the adc dir and I didn't noticed admv8818 also had > filter_mode. > Hmm, don't know, though still biased towards filter_type. > > - The admv8818 filter_mode_available ABI exports different values (auto, > manual, bypass). Ah, I didn't look that far, so yes, I agree this is a good reason to standardize on filter_type instead. > - AD7768-1, ADAQ7768-1, AD7768/AD7768-4, AD7124-4, and AD4170 datasheets > refer to sinc filters as filter types (though not all of those designs are > supported in IIO or have filter attributes). > - The AD4130 datasheets also refers to the digital filter as filter type in > some occasions. > > But some datasheets seem to use filter mode and filter type interchangeably > so I don't know. The admv8818 use case is valid and is both low and high-pass > filtering while the ADCs sinc digital filters act like low-pass filter. > Maybe even provide a different name for ADC digital filtering? > digital_filter_type (or digital_filter_mode)?. > > Thanks for pointing that out.