Message ID | 20250108090457.512198-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | module: Use RCU instead of RCU-sched. | expand |
On 1/8/25 10:04, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > This is an updated version of the initial post after PeterZ made me > aware that there are users outside of the module directory. > The goal is replace the mix auf rcu_read_lock(), rcu_read_lock_sched() > and preempt_disable() with just rcu_read_lock(). Thanks for this cleanup. I've queued the fix in patch #1 on modules-fixes. For the rest, I plan to give folks more time to look at the changes as this affects a number of subsystems. If there are no other concerns, I'd then add the series on modules-next.
On 2025-01-13 12:09:27 [+0100], Petr Pavlu wrote: > Thanks for this cleanup. I've queued the fix in patch #1 on > modules-fixes. For the rest, I plan to give folks more time to look at > the changes as this affects a number of subsystems. If there are no > other concerns, I'd then add the series on modules-next. Good, thanks for the update. Sebastian