Message ID | 20250115061840.269757-1-cem@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | xfs: Prevent mounting with quotas in norecovery if quotacheck is needed | expand |
On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 07:18:32AM +0100, cem@kernel.org wrote: > From: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org> > > Mounting a filesystem that requires quota state changing will generate a > transaction. > > We already check for a read-only device; we should do that for > norecovery too. > > A quotacheck on a norecovery mount, and with the right log size, will cause > the mount process to hang on: > > [<0>] xlog_grant_head_wait+0x5d/0x2a0 [xfs] > [<0>] xlog_grant_head_check+0x112/0x180 [xfs] > [<0>] xfs_log_reserve+0xe3/0x260 [xfs] > [<0>] xfs_trans_reserve+0x179/0x250 [xfs] > [<0>] xfs_trans_alloc+0x101/0x260 [xfs] > [<0>] xfs_sync_sb+0x3f/0x80 [xfs] > [<0>] xfs_qm_mount_quotas+0xe3/0x2f0 [xfs] > [<0>] xfs_mountfs+0x7ad/0xc20 [xfs] > [<0>] xfs_fs_fill_super+0x762/0xa50 [xfs] > [<0>] get_tree_bdev_flags+0x131/0x1d0 > [<0>] vfs_get_tree+0x26/0xd0 > [<0>] vfs_cmd_create+0x59/0xe0 > [<0>] __do_sys_fsconfig+0x4e3/0x6b0 > [<0>] do_syscall_64+0x82/0x160 > [<0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e > > This is caused by a transaction running with bogus initialized head/tail > > I initially hit this while running generic/050, with random log > sizes, but I managed to reproduce it reliably here with the steps > below: > > mkfs.xfs -f -lsize=1025M -f -b size=4096 -m crc=1,reflink=1,rmapbt=1, -i > sparse=1 /dev/vdb2 > /dev/null > mount -o usrquota,grpquota,prjquota /dev/vdb2 /mnt > xfs_io -x -c 'shutdown -f' /mnt > umount /mnt > mount -o ro,norecovery,usrquota,grpquota,prjquota /dev/vdb2 /mnt > > Last mount hangs up > > Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> > --- > fs/xfs/xfs_qm_bhv.c | 12 +++++++----- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_qm_bhv.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_qm_bhv.c > index 37f1230e7584..eae106ca7e1b 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_qm_bhv.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_qm_bhv.c > @@ -97,10 +97,11 @@ xfs_qm_newmount( > } > > /* > - * If the device itself is read-only, we can't allow > - * the user to change the state of quota on the mount - > - * this would generate a transaction on the ro device, > - * which would lead to an I/O error and shutdown > + * If the device itself is read-only and/or in norecovery > + * mode, we can't allow the user to change the state of > + * quota on the mount - this would generate a transaction > + * on the ro device, which would lead to an I/O error and > + * shutdown. > */ > > if (((uquotaondisk && !XFS_IS_UQUOTA_ON(mp)) || > @@ -109,7 +110,8 @@ xfs_qm_newmount( > (!gquotaondisk && XFS_IS_GQUOTA_ON(mp)) || > (pquotaondisk && !XFS_IS_PQUOTA_ON(mp)) || > (!pquotaondisk && XFS_IS_PQUOTA_ON(mp))) && > - xfs_dev_is_read_only(mp, "changing quota state")) { > + (xfs_dev_is_read_only(mp, "changing quota state") || > + xfs_has_norecovery(mp))) { > xfs_warn(mp, "please mount with%s%s%s%s.", > (!quotaondisk ? "out quota" : ""), > (uquotaondisk ? " usrquota" : ""), The logic seems ok, but (as I mentioned in office hours this morning) I wonder if we shouldn't just ignore quota entirely for a norecovery mount? I guess for metadir we also could change the message to say "don't mount with any quota options" since the quota mount options are persistent now. --D > -- > 2.47.1 >
On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 10:24:38PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 07:18:32AM +0100, cem@kernel.org wrote: > > From: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org> > > > > Mounting a filesystem that requires quota state changing will generate a > > transaction. > > > > We already check for a read-only device; we should do that for > > norecovery too. > > > > A quotacheck on a norecovery mount, and with the right log size, will cause > > the mount process to hang on: > > > > [<0>] xlog_grant_head_wait+0x5d/0x2a0 [xfs] > > [<0>] xlog_grant_head_check+0x112/0x180 [xfs] > > [<0>] xfs_log_reserve+0xe3/0x260 [xfs] > > [<0>] xfs_trans_reserve+0x179/0x250 [xfs] > > [<0>] xfs_trans_alloc+0x101/0x260 [xfs] > > [<0>] xfs_sync_sb+0x3f/0x80 [xfs] > > [<0>] xfs_qm_mount_quotas+0xe3/0x2f0 [xfs] > > [<0>] xfs_mountfs+0x7ad/0xc20 [xfs] > > [<0>] xfs_fs_fill_super+0x762/0xa50 [xfs] > > [<0>] get_tree_bdev_flags+0x131/0x1d0 > > [<0>] vfs_get_tree+0x26/0xd0 > > [<0>] vfs_cmd_create+0x59/0xe0 > > [<0>] __do_sys_fsconfig+0x4e3/0x6b0 > > [<0>] do_syscall_64+0x82/0x160 > > [<0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e > > > > This is caused by a transaction running with bogus initialized head/tail > > > > I initially hit this while running generic/050, with random log > > sizes, but I managed to reproduce it reliably here with the steps > > below: > > > > mkfs.xfs -f -lsize=1025M -f -b size=4096 -m crc=1,reflink=1,rmapbt=1, -i > > sparse=1 /dev/vdb2 > /dev/null > > mount -o usrquota,grpquota,prjquota /dev/vdb2 /mnt > > xfs_io -x -c 'shutdown -f' /mnt > > umount /mnt > > mount -o ro,norecovery,usrquota,grpquota,prjquota /dev/vdb2 /mnt > > > > Last mount hangs up > > > > Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> > > --- > > fs/xfs/xfs_qm_bhv.c | 12 +++++++----- > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_qm_bhv.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_qm_bhv.c > > index 37f1230e7584..eae106ca7e1b 100644 > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_qm_bhv.c > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_qm_bhv.c > > @@ -97,10 +97,11 @@ xfs_qm_newmount( > > } > > > > /* > > - * If the device itself is read-only, we can't allow > > - * the user to change the state of quota on the mount - > > - * this would generate a transaction on the ro device, > > - * which would lead to an I/O error and shutdown > > + * If the device itself is read-only and/or in norecovery > > + * mode, we can't allow the user to change the state of > > + * quota on the mount - this would generate a transaction > > + * on the ro device, which would lead to an I/O error and > > + * shutdown. > > */ > > > > if (((uquotaondisk && !XFS_IS_UQUOTA_ON(mp)) || > > @@ -109,7 +110,8 @@ xfs_qm_newmount( > > (!gquotaondisk && XFS_IS_GQUOTA_ON(mp)) || > > (pquotaondisk && !XFS_IS_PQUOTA_ON(mp)) || > > (!pquotaondisk && XFS_IS_PQUOTA_ON(mp))) && > > - xfs_dev_is_read_only(mp, "changing quota state")) { > > + (xfs_dev_is_read_only(mp, "changing quota state") || > > + xfs_has_norecovery(mp))) { > > xfs_warn(mp, "please mount with%s%s%s%s.", > > (!quotaondisk ? "out quota" : ""), > > (uquotaondisk ? " usrquota" : ""), > > The logic seems ok, but (as I mentioned in office hours this morning) I > wonder if we shouldn't just ignore quota entirely for a norecovery > mount? I gave it a thought. It might work, but, if there are no changes to be made, I don't see a problem in mounting with quotas and let user browse quota data. > > I guess for metadir we also could change the message to say "don't mount > with any quota options" since the quota mount options are persistent now. No complains about it :)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_qm_bhv.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_qm_bhv.c index 37f1230e7584..eae106ca7e1b 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_qm_bhv.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_qm_bhv.c @@ -97,10 +97,11 @@ xfs_qm_newmount( } /* - * If the device itself is read-only, we can't allow - * the user to change the state of quota on the mount - - * this would generate a transaction on the ro device, - * which would lead to an I/O error and shutdown + * If the device itself is read-only and/or in norecovery + * mode, we can't allow the user to change the state of + * quota on the mount - this would generate a transaction + * on the ro device, which would lead to an I/O error and + * shutdown. */ if (((uquotaondisk && !XFS_IS_UQUOTA_ON(mp)) || @@ -109,7 +110,8 @@ xfs_qm_newmount( (!gquotaondisk && XFS_IS_GQUOTA_ON(mp)) || (pquotaondisk && !XFS_IS_PQUOTA_ON(mp)) || (!pquotaondisk && XFS_IS_PQUOTA_ON(mp))) && - xfs_dev_is_read_only(mp, "changing quota state")) { + (xfs_dev_is_read_only(mp, "changing quota state") || + xfs_has_norecovery(mp))) { xfs_warn(mp, "please mount with%s%s%s%s.", (!quotaondisk ? "out quota" : ""), (uquotaondisk ? " usrquota" : ""),