| Message ID | 20250128142152.9889-4-philmd@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | accel: Only include qdev-realized vCPUs in global &cpus_queue | expand |
On 1/28/25 06:21, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > Previous commit removed the restriction on completing the full QDev > UNREALIZE step before removing vCPUs from global queue, it is now > safe to call cpu_list_remove() after accel_cpu_common_unrealize(). > > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> > --- > cpu-target.c | 7 ++----- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/cpu-target.c b/cpu-target.c > index 667688332c9..11592e2583f 100644 > --- a/cpu-target.c > +++ b/cpu-target.c > @@ -172,12 +172,9 @@ void cpu_exec_unrealizefn(CPUState *cpu) > } > #endif > > - cpu_list_remove(cpu); > - /* > - * Now that the vCPU has been removed from the RCU list, we can call > - * accel_cpu_common_unrealize, which may free fields using call_rcu. > - */ > accel_cpu_common_unrealize(cpu); > + > + cpu_list_remove(cpu); > } I don't believe this is correct. Why would we have an unrealized cpu on the list? What's wrong with removing the cpu from the list before unrealize? r~
diff --git a/cpu-target.c b/cpu-target.c index 667688332c9..11592e2583f 100644 --- a/cpu-target.c +++ b/cpu-target.c @@ -172,12 +172,9 @@ void cpu_exec_unrealizefn(CPUState *cpu) } #endif - cpu_list_remove(cpu); - /* - * Now that the vCPU has been removed from the RCU list, we can call - * accel_cpu_common_unrealize, which may free fields using call_rcu. - */ accel_cpu_common_unrealize(cpu); + + cpu_list_remove(cpu); } /*
Previous commit removed the restriction on completing the full QDev UNREALIZE step before removing vCPUs from global queue, it is now safe to call cpu_list_remove() after accel_cpu_common_unrealize(). Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> --- cpu-target.c | 7 ++----- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)