Message ID | 20250304183506.498724-1-mjguzik@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | avoid the extra atomic on a ref when closing a fd | expand |
On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 19:35:02 +0100 Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com> wrote: > The stock kernel transitioning the file to no refs held penalizes the > caller with an extra atomic to block any increments. > > For cases where the file is highly likely to be going away this is > easily avoidable. Have you looked at the problem caused by epoll() ? The epoll code has a 'hidden' extra reference to the fd. This doesn't usualy matter, but some of the driver callbacks add and remove an extra reference - which doesn't work well if fput() has just decremented it to zero. The fput code might need to do a 'decrement not one' so that the epoll tidyup can be done while the refcount is still one. That would save the extra atomic pair that (IIRC) got added into the epoll callback code. Thoughts? David
On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 07:35:02PM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote: > The stock kernel transitioning the file to no refs held penalizes the > caller with an extra atomic to block any increments. > > For cases where the file is highly likely to be going away this is > easily avoidable. > > In the open+close case the win is very modest because of the following > problems: > - kmem and memcg having terrible performance I thought that was going to be addressed by Vlastimil, i.e., the mm guys to provide a new memcg api. > - putname using an atomic (I have a wip to whack that) > - open performing an extra ref/unref on the dentry (there are patches to > do it, including by Al. I mailed about them in [1]) > - creds using atomics (I have a wip to whack that) > - apparmor using atomics (ditto, same mechanism) > > On top of that I have a WIP patch to dodge some of the work at lookup > itself. > > All in all there is several % avoidably lost here. > > stats colected during a kernel build with: > bpftrace -e 'kprobe:filp_close,kprobe:fput,kprobe:fput_close* { @[probe] = hist(((struct file *)arg0)->f_ref.refcnt.counter > 0); }' > > @[kprobe:filp_close]: > [0] 32195 |@@@@@@@@@@ | > [1] 164567 |@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@| > > @[kprobe:fput]: > [0] 339240 |@@@@@@ | > [1] 2888064 |@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@| > > @[kprobe:fput_close]: > [0] 5116767 |@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@| > [1] 164544 |@ | > > @[kprobe:fput_close_sync]: > [0] 5340660 |@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@| > [1] 358943 |@@@ | > > > 0 indicates the last reference, 1 that there is more. > > filp_close is largely skewed because of close_on_exec. > > vast majority of last fputs are from remove_vma. I think that code wants > to be patched to batch them (as in something like fput_many should be > added -- something for later). We used to have that for io_uring and got rid of it. The less fput() primitives the better tbh. But let's see. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20250304165728.491785-1-mjguzik@gmail.com/T/#u > > v2: > - patch filp_close > - patch failing open > > Mateusz Guzik (4): > file: add fput and file_ref_put routines optimized for use when > closing a fd > fs: use fput_close_sync() in close() > fs: use fput_close() in filp_close() > fs: use fput_close() in path_openat() > > fs/file.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > fs/file_table.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > fs/namei.c | 2 +- > fs/open.c | 4 +-- > include/linux/file.h | 2 ++ > include/linux/file_ref.h | 1 + > 6 files changed, 114 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.43.0 >
On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 11:38 AM Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 07:35:02PM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote: > > The stock kernel transitioning the file to no refs held penalizes the > > caller with an extra atomic to block any increments. > > > > For cases where the file is highly likely to be going away this is > > easily avoidable. > > > > In the open+close case the win is very modest because of the following > > problems: > > - kmem and memcg having terrible performance > > I thought that was going to be addressed by Vlastimil, i.e., the mm guys > to provide a new memcg api. afaics this is for kmem only, no memcg support. There is an old patch which sped up memcg, but got reverted and it is on the table to bring it back, but Vlastimil is dragging his foot. > > vast majority of last fputs are from remove_vma. I think that code wants > > to be patched to batch them (as in something like fput_many should be > > added -- something for later). > > We used to have that for io_uring and got rid of it. The less fput() > primitives the better tbh. But let's see. > I would say a _many (or whatever) variant is pretty idiomatic, but I'm not going to insist. This is a side remark to the patchset.
On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 3:19 AM David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com> wrote: > Have you looked at the problem caused by epoll() ? > The epoll code has a 'hidden' extra reference to the fd. > This doesn't usualy matter, but some of the driver callbacks add and > remove an extra reference - which doesn't work well if fput() has > just decremented it to zero. > > The fput code might need to do a 'decrement not one' so that the > epoll tidyup can be done while the refcount is still one. > > That would save the extra atomic pair that (IIRC) got added into > the epoll callback code. > > Thoughts? I am not aware of this problem and don't have particular interest in looking at it either, sorry. Good thing you are free to make the case to Christian. :)